CONTENTS
Innovator in Mining
Sector Celebrates 25 Years in Saskatchewan
New Local Coffee Shops
Open in Regina and Saskatoon
Saskatchewan Urban
Municipalities Association’s Annual Convention
Annual Women Breaking
Barriers Conference Empowers Saskatchewan Women
Saskatchewan and France to Develop Supply Chains for Critical Minerals
Opposition Position on
Carbon Tax
Cost of Living and
Affordability
Health Care Staffing
and Usage of Hyperbaric Chamber
Contract with Private
Company for Provision of Surgeries
Emergency Hotel Stays
Paid by Social Services
Overdose Deaths and
Treatment for Addictions
FOURTH
SESSION — TWENTY-NINTH LEGISLATURE
of
the
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
DEBATES
AND PROCEEDINGS
(HANSARD)
N.S. Vol. 65 No. 46A Monday, April
15, 2024, 13:30
[Prayers]
The Speaker: — On Thursday, April 10th, 2024 the
Deputy Government House Leader rose on a point of order alleging that the
Leader of the Opposition indirectly accused the Premier of being dishonest in
her statement “. . . Saskatchewan people expect their leaders to be
honest and forthright.” The Opposition House Leader argued that the words were
not out of order. I committed to reviewing the record and have since conducted
a thorough review of the Hansards published in the past few weeks.
In
my review I found many instances where members on both sides of the floor
insinuated that other members were being dishonest or untrustworthy. Members
will recall that in some of these cases, I asked members to withdraw and
apologize for the statements.
I
would direct members to Beauchesne’s, 6th Edition,
which states on page 151, “It is not unparliamentary temperately to criticize
statements made by Members as being contrary to the facts; but no imputation of
intentional falsehood is permissible.” While proper debate may involve
different interpretations of fact, members well know that impugning the honesty
and integrity of other members is unparliamentary.
In
determining a ruling, a Speaker must take more than just the words or phrases
spoken by a member into account. As is noted in Beauchesne’s,
the tone, manner, and intention of the person speaking must also be considered.
Additionally, as Speaker Toth noted on December 7th, 2010:
. . . the context and use of the word is key to
determining whether or not it is acceptable.
One of the acceptability tests is cited in the House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, 2nd edition at page 614, which is as
follows: “Remarks directed specifically at another Member which question that
Member’s integrity, honesty, or character are not in order.”
Over
the past few weeks, in addition to insinuations of dishonesty, I also found
that members on both sides of this Chamber have increasingly engaged in
inflammatory and provocative statements, personal attacks, and name calling,
which have caused disruption in this Chamber. Such instances were not limited
to question period but could be found throughout routine proceedings, during
introduction of guests, presenting petitions, and statements by members.
I
would repeatedly ask members to withdraw and apologize for their conduct, yet
unparliamentary behaviour persists. In the context of the escalating disorder
in this Chamber and similar statements over the past few weeks, I find the
point of order well taken. However given the numerous infractions on Thursday,
I will not single out the Leader of the Opposition to apologize.
I
would like to conclude by quoting Speaker
Docherty from April 18th, 2019, page 5834 of Hansard:
The decorum we show in this
Assembly is not merely out of respect for each other. It is instead an
expression of the respect we . . . owe the constituents we represent.
Hon. members come to this Chamber to reflect diverse
viewpoints and to debate alternatives. I expect all members to do so
respectfully according to their Code of Ethical Conduct. When members engage in
unparliamentary conduct, they are disrespectful not only to other members but
to this very institution and to the people we serve.
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of
Education.
Hon. Mr. Cockrill: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker,
to you and through you, I’d like to welcome two guests sitting in your gallery
this afternoon. With us today we have two members of the council for the town
of Battleford. We have Councillor Doug Laing and then Mayor Ames Leslie as well
joining us today.
These
two gentlemen are among a group that serve one of the municipalities that I
represent — the municipality that I call home — very well in terms of serving
our town’s residents and the needs of those residents each and every single
day.
I’d
like to just quickly give a special shout-out to Ames, who over the last year
was diagnosed with cancer and has fought that cancer and, thanks to the good
folks at the Battlefords Union Hospital, is working through that and continues
to serve our community in many regards including as mayor.
So,
Mr. Speaker, I would ask all members of the House to join me in welcoming Mayor
Leslie and Councillor Laing to this their Legislative Assembly.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Rosemont.
Mr. Wotherspoon: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To you and
through you, it’s a pleasure to join with the minister and welcome these two
leaders from The Battlefords, Mayor Ames Leslie and Councillor Doug Laing.
Thank you so much for joining us here today. Thank you for your leadership, not
only to your community but to Saskatchewan and for representing the way that
you do. And joining with the minister as well, we offer our care and continued
best wishes as you battle, and we wish you nothing but health and healing as
well to the mayor.
So
we wish these two well and we wish them a very good week here in Regina over at
the SUMA [Saskatchewan Urban Municipalities Association] convention. On behalf
of the official opposition, it’s my pleasure to welcome them both.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Martensville-Warman.
Mr. Jenson: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. To
you and through you this afternoon, I’d also like to join with the Minister of
Education and the member opposite in welcoming Ames and Doug to their
Legislative Assembly, and Doug in particular.
Doug
and I have a history going back to high school. We went to high school
together, and if that wasn’t enough, we ended up working at the same radio
station back in the early 1990s or late 1980s. The difference being he worked on one side of the
wall, on the FM side; I was on the AM side. He got to play all the cool stuff
like Aerosmith and the Stones, AC/DC. I got stuck with Neil Sedaka,
The Bells, and Captain & Tennille.
So
it’s very interesting to see how our paths lined up in high school and then
lined up through our broadcasting careers, and then they kind of went our
separate ways. And now we’re back both working in government, with Doug being
municipal government and I’m in provincial government.
So
Doug, you’re a fantastic leader for the people of Battleford and the
surrounding communities. You do great work and all your work with you and Ames
is recognized, and it’s good to see you here in town this week for SUMA. I look
forward to seeing you again hopefully later on today or sometime this week.
With that I’d like to invite all members to join me in welcoming Ames and Doug
to their Legislative Assembly.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Yorkton.
Mr. Ottenbreit: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To you and
through you to all members of the Assembly, it’s always an honour to stand here
and introduce people that have served here and served with us previously.
Behind the bar on our side is Rob Norris, former member for Saskatoon, also
former minister.
A
quick little story about Rob. It would have been shortly after we got elected,
it would have been early ’08. I was in the premier’s office to chat with Brad
and he was busy at the time. Rhonda was pretty new in the office, new in the
building at the time, and so I explained that I wanted to see the premier. And
she said, well I’ll let him know you’re here, Minister Norris. And back then
Rob and I had similar haircuts, similar glasses, and we’re both kind of short
wheelbase, so you know, I could see the mistake being made.
So
I’d ask all members to welcome Rob Norris to his Legislative Assembly.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Rosemont.
Mr. Wotherspoon: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On behalf of
the official opposition, it’s a pleasure to welcome Rob Norris to his Assembly.
I had the privilege of serving alongside Rob in this Assembly as well. We wish
him well with all of his endeavours. I think he’s working with a local energy
company these days. He’s been active of course with the U of S
[University of Saskatchewan] and the synchrotron, many other areas as well.
Around
here, back in the day, Mr. Speaker, he was a bit of Norris the Thesaurus in here,
Mr. Speaker. And he was an animated guy to debate with in here. We want to
welcome Rob to his Assembly here today and thank him for his contributions to
his province.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Batoche.
Mr. Kirsch: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We, the
undersigned residents of the province of Saskatchewan, wish to bring to your
attention the following: whereas the Trudeau Liberal-NDP [New Democratic Party]
coalition carbon tax is one of the main causes of affordability issues and
inflation in the nation of Canada; that the federal Liberal-NDP government was
politically motivated in issuing a carve-out for home heating oil; and that the
Government of Saskatchewan decision to not collect or remit the carbon tax on
home heating in Saskatchewan has led to a drop in inflation; further, that
despite the decision to not charge the carbon tax on home heating, Saskatchewan
families continue to pay the tax out of pocket at pumps, grocery stores, and
more.
We, in the prayer that reads as follows, respectfully
request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan take the following
action: to call upon the Government of Canada to immediately suspend the carbon
tax across the nation of Canada and acknowledge its significant impact on
affordability and inflation in Canada.
The
below undersigned residents are from Martensville. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from
Saskatoon Centre.
Ms. Nippi-Albright: — Miigwech,
Mr. Speaker. I’m pleased to present the following petition.
The
folks who signed this petition wish to bring to your attention the following:
the Sask Party government voted against
duty-to-consult legislation; Saskatchewan needs legislation to ensure the
provincial duty-to-consult is fulfilled and is carried out with the honour of
the Crown; the Sask Party government has never
addressed cumulative impacts, yet duty-to-consult must consider cumulative
effects on the ability to practise inherent and treaty rights before approving
projects in Saskatchewan.
I’ll
read the prayer:
We, in the prayer that reads as follows, respectfully
request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan call on the Government of
Saskatchewan to enshrine duty-to-consult into law by enacting meaningful duty-to-consult
legislation.
The
folks who signed this petition reside in Saskatoon. I do so present.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from
Saskatoon Meewasin.
Mr. Teed: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I
rise to present our petition calling on the Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan to suspend the fuel tax.
The
undersigned residents of the province wish to bring to our attention the
following: that Saskatchewan people are struggling to keep up with increased
costs of food, shelter, and other basic necessities, as wages have not kept up
with the rate of inflation; that according to an October 2023 Angus Reid poll,
more than one-third of people in Saskatchewan are struggling with the cost of
living; and that the Saskatchewan Party government could follow other
jurisdictions such as Alberta, Ontario, Manitoba, and Newfoundland in providing
immediate cost-of-living relief to Saskatchewan families by suspending the 15‑cent-per-litre
provincial gas tax.
Mr.
Speaker, I will read the prayer:
We, in the prayer that reads as follows, respectfully
request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan call on the Government of
Saskatchewan to suspend the collection of the provincial fuel tax from gasoline
and diesel for a period of six months to help families struggling with the high
cost of living.
Mr.
Speaker, the undersigned residents reside in Prince Albert. I do so present.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Walsh Acres.
Mr.
Clarke:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today to present our petition calling on the
government to immediately address the doctor shortage in Rosthern and Duck
Lake. The undersigned residents would like to bring to our attention the
following: that emergency services at the Rosthern Hospital continue to experience
closures due to a shortage of doctors, and that nearly 1,000 people in Duck
Lake, Rosthern, and the surrounding area are without a doctor. This is in the
Premier’s backyard, Mr. Speaker. You’d think they’d be able to find solutions
in that constituency, but folks are struggling to get access to that primary
care.
I’ll
read the prayer:
We, in the prayer that reads as follows, respectfully
request the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan call on the Government of
Saskatchewan to immediately recruit and retain doctors to provide adequate and
accessible health care to Rosthern, Duck Lake, and the surrounding area.
The
signatories today reside in Rosthern. I do so present.
The
Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Cannington.
Mr. D. Harrison: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. A milestone
anniversary is being marked by a company that introduced vital mining
technology and methods to Saskatchewan.
[13:45]
Nine
out of the ten potash shafts in Saskatchewan were completed by Thyssen Mining
working as shaft sinking contractor in the 1960s and
’70s. Thyssen went on to establish itself in the
uranium sector, completing all underground mine development for uranium mines
in Saskatchewan since 1983. As they diversified it established joint ventures
and partnerships including Mudjatik Thyssen Mining.
It has proven for more than 25 years to be a highly successful model for First
Nations communities to participate in economic development opportunities with
northern Saskatchewan uranium mines.
On
behalf of the Legislative Assembly, thank you to Thyssen Mining for continuing
to contribute to Saskatchewan’s economy. Thank you.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Saskatoon
Meewasin.
Mr. Teed: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I
am always excited to hear of new small businesses opening in Saskatchewan. And
for those who know me, I love supporting local coffee shops. Mr. Speaker, two
new coffee shops have opened their doors in Saskatchewan and I encourage folks
in both of our largest cities to take time to support them.
In
Saskatoon Chef Taszia Thakur and her husband, Karan,
co-owners behind long-standing restaurant Calories, have opened a new cafe in
downtown Saskatoon called Pique which will offer coffee, sandwiches, pastries,
bread, and so many of the unique creations Calories has been known for for years. I know Pique will be a fixture of Saskatoon
downtown for years to come. In fact I wrote this member statement sitting in
their new cafe.
In
Regina another coffee shop has taken root. Pause Coffee started as a company
offering beans and brewing equipment right to your door during the pandemic
when our favourite coffee shops were closed. Pause Coffee, owned by Alayne and Jason Dubord, are
excited to be opening a permanent coffee shop location in Regina’s Cathedral
neighbourhood. Pause is partnering with Somethin’
Sweet Desserts for an amazing baked goods selection, and turned to Kustom Kitties for some of the furniture and fit-ups. Pause
is community focused and equity driven, both in their sourcing practices and
locally.
Mr.
Speaker, I would ask all members to join me in congratulating both Pique cafe
and Pause Coffee on their openings in Saskatoon and Regina. Thank you.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from
Athabasca.
Mr. Lemaigre: — SUMA Convention 2024 has begun and
will run from Sunday to Wednesday this week. This important event provides us
with a unique opportunity to connect with and listen directly to the voices of
urban municipalities across Saskatchewan. I’m proud to say our Premier gave his
address at the convention this morning.
Since
1906 SUMA has been hosting its annual convention, and this year it will bring
together over 1,000 delegates to meet and discuss the futures of our towns,
cities, and villages, as well as the challenges associated with a rapidly
growing province. Our government will be there, connecting with delegates
through the meetings, dialogue sessions, and the famed bear pit.
Mr.
Speaker, our government is incredibly proud of the work we have done with our
municipalities. The ’24‑25 budget provides nearly $557 million in
direct support for municipalities across the province. This includes a record
investment of 340 million into no-strings-attached municipal revenue
sharing, so your communities can build for success and growth. Mr. Speaker,
that’s 167 per cent increase in revenue sharing from 2007‑2008. A total
of $4.3 billion has been allocated directly to municipalities.
I
would ask all members join me in thanking everyone involved in organizing this
year’s SUMA convention as well as recognizing the dedication our municipal
partners bring to serving the people of Saskatchewan. Thank you.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
University.
Ms. A. Young: — Why, thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker. Last week we raised another example of this tired and out-of-touch
government’s abysmal economic record. Mr. Speaker, we are losing both head
offices and head office jobs — fact.
Now
if the members opposite won’t believe me, if they don’t believe Statistics
Canada, will they believe one of their friends? I want to read directly from a
short article released by Saskatchewan’s own Paul Martin, and I quote,
“Saskatchewan has fewer head offices than five years ago. It’s a metric that is
important in measuring the potency of an economy.” He goes on:
We have 79 major head offices located here, down about 8
per cent in the previous five years. The number of people working in
Saskatchewan head offices fell almost 15 per cent in the most recent five
years.
Now,
Mr. Speaker, we know that this government hates to talk about their record
which, to be clear, is Canada’s worst jobs record, a 20 per cent drop in
immigrant retention, 6 out of 10 people worried about paying their bills, and
paycheques that just ain’t keeping up with the tax
and utility hikes under this government.
It’s
clear why they refuse to live in the now because their record is abysmal. The
best they can do is point to a policy choice from a government 50 years ago.
Mr. Speaker, that’d be like me accusing this government for being responsible
for the 12 criminal acts from the Devine government that they were convicted
of.
Now,
Mr. Speaker, they may be bad at history, but one thing we know for sure is this
government is no slouch at Sask Party math.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from
Lloydminster.
Ms. C. Young: — Mr. Speaker, last Thursday the
second annual Women Breaking Barriers Conference took place right here in the
Queen City at the Saskatchewan Science Centre. This conference is about
empowering women to advance in their careers and acknowledging the contribution
women make to our economy. The Government of Saskatchewan is proud to be a
sponsor, providing $25,000, continuing our commitment of empowering women to
live safe, healthy, and prosperous lives.
This
year’s presenters featured women from a variety of sectors to share insights,
experiences, and strategies to advance leadership potential while also offering
networking and mentorship opportunities. The leadership panel had a focus on
the women spearheading our Crown corporations, including Penny McCune,
president and CEO [chief executive officer] of SGI [Saskatchewan Government
Insurance]; Charlene Gavel, president and CEO of SaskTel; Susan Flett, president and CEO of Lotteries and Gaming
Saskatchewan; Kathryn Pollack, VP [vice-president], SaskPower; and Rhea Brown,
VP, SaskPower.
The
conference was livestreamed to 25 satellite and micro satellite locations
throughout the province, bringing together diverse women from rural, urban, and
northern communities. Our government is committed to advancing the status of
women by providing opportunities that enable women to thrive and contribute to
Saskatchewan’s communities’ well-being and economic success for years to come.
Thank you.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from
Martensville-Warman.
Mr. Jenson: — Mr. Speaker, this morning the
Minister of Trade and Export Development met with French Minister Riester, delegate for foreign trade, to mark the beginning
of a new partnership. Saskatchewan and France have signed a new letter of
intent on the development of supply chains for strategic minerals. Saskatchewan
is home to 23 critical minerals, including uranium, potash, lithium, helium,
and many more. This agreement will focus on improving supply chain security and
sustainability along with the research and development for critical minerals.
During
his remarks, the French minister referred to Saskatchewan as “the new
frontier,” and commended the province as one of the most developed
jurisdictions in the world for sustainable resource development.
Our
government recognizes the vital importance of our mining sector. The same
cannot be said for the members opposite. They consistently talk down our trade
missions and the provincial resource industry. And they have no plan for how
they would grow the economy and develop new international partnerships. Their
only economic plan would annihilate trade offices, isolate Saskatchewan from
international markets, and crash our economy.
By
opposing our resource sector, the members opposite continue to show us exactly
who they are. And we believe them. Our government will continue to grow and
invest in our mining sector because we know the NDP won’t. Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from
Kindersley.
Mr. Francis: — Mr. Speaker, the NDP wonder why they
have no credibility on the carbon tax. It’s because Canadians have a hard time
understanding their position. And that was demonstrated again last week by
their federal leader, Jagmeet Singh. In a speech to the Broadbent Institute on
Thursday, Singh surprised a lot of people, including his boss, Justin Trudeau,
by saying the NDP no longer support the consumer carbon tax.
But
of course, Mr. Speaker, that didn’t last very long. Now we don’t know if he
received thousands of calls from upset NDP members or just one call from his
boss, Justin Trudeau. But either way, less than 24 hours later, the NDP issued
a statement backpedalling on their backpedalling saying they have not changed
their position and they still in fact support the Trudeau carbon tax.
Confusing, yes; strangely similar to the NDP here in Saskatchewan, a party
desperately and unsuccessfully, I might add, trying to distance themselves from
the carbon tax because we know so many of their members still support one.
Mr.
Speaker, there is one party in this province that was against the Trudeau
carbon tax since day one and every day since then. And we will continue to
stand up for Saskatchewan families against the carbon tax until it is removed
on everything for everyone. Thank you.
The Speaker: — I recognize
the Leader of the Opposition.
Ms. Beck: — Mr. Speaker, Saskatchewan people
continue to fall further and further behind under this tired and out-of-touch
government. Fifty-seven per cent of people struggling to pay their grocery
bills. Six thousand jobs lost last month. Fewer head office jobs and fewer head
offices here in Saskatchewan today than when that Premier took office.
Mr.
Speaker, Saskatchewan people need a break, but that Premier is failing to
deliver. Why is the Premier refusing to deliver the cost-of-living relief that
Saskatchewan families need? And why won’t he cut the fuel tax to deliver that
break that struggling families desperately need him to make?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Premier.
Hon. Mr. Moe: — Mr. Speaker, yet again I would point
the Leader of the Opposition one more time to pages 75 and 76 of the budget,
Mr. Speaker, where in three out of four income categories Regina, Saskatchewan
is deemed the most affordable place in Canada to live.
Mr.
Speaker, it goes on here. Let’s go to a few media articles. CTV News on March
the 1st of this year reported in a title, Mr. Speaker, as I quote, “Regina’s
affordable housing market is piquing the interest of buyers from across
Canada.” Mr. Speaker, just prior to that in February 28th, CTV [Canadian
Television Network Ltd.] also had this headline, Mr. Speaker. Again I quote,
“Regina ranked as the most affordable city in Canada to purchase a
single-family home.”
Mr.
Speaker, we continue, through the strength of a strong and prosperous economy,
to attract people to live in our communities, which are wholly affordable
relative to other places across Canada. And we can get into those comparisons,
Mr. Speaker. And we continue to work to attract not only head offices, Mr.
Speaker, but to attract industries to invest in this province, Mr. Speaker.
What
we see with the members opposite, Mr. Speaker, is again saying one thing, do
another, as the NDP’s head office is actually Jagmeet Singh’s office in Ottawa,
Mr. Speaker.
The
Speaker:
— I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Ms. Beck: — That’s a look, Mr. Speaker, from a
Premier who’s failing to deliver the cost-of-living relief that Saskatchewan
families need. And he’s also failing to deliver when it comes to health care
that Saskatchewan families can count on.
Mr.
Speaker, earlier today we were joined by Moose Jaw firefighters calling on this
government to restore service to the hyperbaric chamber. Firefighters raised
almost a million dollars to get the hyperbaric chamber built in the first
place, but now it’s serving only one patient while all others have to go out of
province for the care they need.
What
does the Premier say to firefighters who have worked so hard to get this
facility built, only to see Saskatchewan patients turned away?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Premier.
Hon. Mr. Moe: — Mr. Speaker, first and foremost I
would say thank you to those firefighters in Moose Jaw for not only the job
they do each and every day running towards danger, while we, the rest of us,
quite often find ourselves running a different direction, Mr. Speaker. Thank
you to them.
Thank
you, and I remember the discussions around the construction of the Wigmore
Hospital in Moose Jaw, the discussions that we had, the previous minister of
Health, Mr. Speaker with the firefighters from Moose Jaw on their fundraising
campaign to ensure that the Wigmore Hospital, new Wigmore Hospital did include
a hyperbaric chamber, Mr. Speaker. That commitment was made by this government
at that point in time, and that commitment to operate that hyperbaric chamber
remains true today, Mr. Speaker.
And
it’s my understanding — and this has not been mentioned by the members opposite
— that there is a requirement for four respiratory therapists to service the
full scope of hours that that hyperbaric chamber would like to offer. Three of
those respiratory therapists have been secured, Mr. Speaker, which is resulting
in reduced service but a service that is being provided to — which I think was
delivered in committee the other day — two individuals that are utilizing the
chamber or need to utilize the chamber in the near future, Mr. Speaker.
Upon
the successful recruitment of a fourth respiratory therapist, Mr. Speaker, full
services will resume.
The Speaker: — I recognize the Leader of the
Opposition.
Ms. Beck: — Mr. Speaker, I can assure the
Premier that the people of Moose Jaw and the Moose Jaw firefighters remember
that story just a little bit different from the one that the Premier just told.
But the Moose Jaw firefighters are not the only ones who are frustrated by this
government’s failures with the hyperbaric chamber.
[14:00]
Brayden
Dutchak joins us here today in the west gallery. Brayden’s mom is a cancer
survivor who relies on the hyperbaric chamber for the care that she needs. And
he has been a tireless and effective advocate for his mom, and she’s now able
to access that chamber. And, Mr. Speaker, that is a good thing, but because of
the chronic short-staffing, she’s the only person in the province who is able
to do so.
And
Brayden wants this chamber to be available to everyone who needs it to have
access to this life-saving care. What does the Premier have to say to Bryden?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Premier.
Hon. Mr. Moe: — First of all, I would welcome
Brayden to his Legislative Assembly and thank him for his advocacy on behalf of
health care services not only being offered to the community of Moose Jaw but —
I think they’re the only hyperbaric chamber in Saskatchewan — health care
services that are made available to all Saskatchewan residents.
It’s
my understanding that the Minister of Rural and Remote Health, who also serves
as an MLA [Member of the Legislative Assembly] for the community of Moose Jaw,
has been in contact with Brayden, Mr. Speaker. And I would say this to Brayden:
he is right. We didn’t invest in the hyperbaric chamber within the new Wigmore
Hospital with the intent of not operating it to its full capacity, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, there has been some challenges, some human resource challenges. And I
would say those challenges are not only exclusive to the province of
Saskatchewan, but those are across Canada, Mr. Speaker. And what you have seen
is one of the most ambitious health human resource action plans put in place in
this province that is ensuring, Mr. Speaker, that today we are able to offer
three of the respiratory therapists offering that service in the community of
Moose Jaw, with every intent to secure a fourth respiratory therapist and make
that service available as it was intended to be, Mr. Speaker, when we made the
commitment to build the facility.
The Speaker: — I recognize the Leader of the
Opposition.
Ms. Beck: — Mr. Speaker, sadly this is what
Saskatchewan people have come to expect from this tired and out-of-touch
government. They lurch from crisis to crisis but consistently fail to get to
the root cause of the problem in the first place.
Mr.
Speaker, with the hyperbaric chamber, as with so many other issues in health
care, the root cause is short-staffing. We need to hire more health care
workers, and we need to end the culture of burnout and disrespect that drives
health care staff from the profession and the province in the first place. We
need a grow-your-own solution to plan, to retain and train Saskatchewan health
care workers to give care to Saskatchewan people.
When
will the Premier recognize that the health care staffing plan is not working
and start listening to the solutions that are coming from health care workers
in this province?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Premier.
Hon. Mr. Moe: — Mr. Speaker, I was drawing quite the
comparison in my mind. I was elected to this Assembly on behalf of the people
of Rosthern-Shellbrook in 2011, Mr. Speaker. Prior to that I worked within my
community as a health care advocate recruiting physicians at that point in
time, of which our province had become desperately low on, Mr. Speaker.
I
remember the conversations I’d had then, newly elected, with the then minister
of Health — the member from Indian Head-Milestone; today, Mr. Speaker, our
Minister of Government Relations — and the revamp of the College of Medicine at
the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, the expansion from 60 physician
training seats to 100, the expansion of the residency positions, Mr. Speaker,
from 60 to 120.
We’ve
seen since that, Mr. Speaker, the doubling of nurse training seats in our
institutions, the addition of psychiatric nurse training seats, of which the
members opposite actually got rid of here in the province, Mr. Speaker. And now
you’re seeing the significant expansion of nurse practitioner training seats,
the expansion of scope for them to operate within our communities, Mr. Speaker.
We
are not about to take any lessons, Mr. Speaker, when it comes to health human
resource action plans from the members opposite because their action plan was
to fire nurses, to fire physicians, Mr. Speaker, and send our kids to Alberta
because they closed their hospital.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Walsh Acres.
Mr.
Clarke:
— I’ll just remind the Premier, 53 hospital closures under his watch as
Premier. That’s the fact. You know, it’s a good thing that Brayden’s mom is able
to get the care at the hyperbaric chamber, but it’s a crying shame that nobody
else in Saskatchewan can because of the short-staffing crisis that this
government has created.
Health
care workers are not being heard by this tired and out-of-touch government, and
it’s long past time that the Sask Party take
responsibility for the damage that they have done. Will the minister do that
today? It’s been three years, Mr. Speaker. When will the hyperbaric chamber in
Moose Jaw be fully operational for all of Saskatchewan people?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Rural
and Remote Health.
Hon. Mr. T. McLeod: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As the
Premier said in his previous answer, we are aware through the SHA [Saskatchewan
Health Authority] that there are two patients in Saskatchewan seeking treatment
at the hyperbaric chamber. One is currently receiving that treatment and the
other, to our understanding, Mr. Speaker, is meeting with their physician to
build a treatment plan to receive treatment at the hyperbaric chamber.
Mr.
Speaker, as the Premier said, we require a fourth respiratory therapist. That
position is being recruited as we speak, Mr. Speaker. And once recruited, we’re
anxious and excited to see that services at the Moose Jaw hyperbaric chamber fully
resume. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Walsh Acres.
Mr.
Clarke:
— Mr. Speaker, the government has said that the hyperbaric chamber is closed.
No physicians know it’s closed, so why would they refer patients to the closed
hyperbaric chamber? Patients are going out of province to get this care right
now.
Their
plan isn’t working. If it was, the firefighters wouldn’t have joined us today
to say that more needs to be done. If it was working, Brayden wouldn’t be here
saying that more needs to be done. Chronic short-staffing and burnout is
driving health care workers out of our province, and it’s forcing patients out
of our province too.
Does
the minister think it’s acceptable for the hyperbaric chamber to be providing
care to only one patient while some in Saskatchewan go to Alberta and the rest
go without care?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Rural
and Remote Health.
Hon. Mr. T. McLeod: — Mr. Speaker, I would ask the member,
who are the rest? We are aware of two patients that are seeking treatment from
the hyperbaric chamber. One is currently receiving those treatments, and I
thank Brayden for joining us here today. He has been a tireless advocate for
services for his mother. And as the Premier indicated, I was happy to have
correspondence together with Brayden about the situation.
Mr.
Speaker, we are seeking a fourth respiratory therapist and, as soon as that
individual is recruited, we will gladly see the services of the Moose Jaw
hyperbaric chamber fully resumed. Thank you.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Walsh Acres.
Mr.
Clarke:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Saskatchewan people expect the care that they need to
be there when and where they need it. But this tired and out-of-touch
government has broken our health care system, and they’re not the ones up to
fix it. They’ve had six years under this Premier to do it and they have failed.
It’s time for a change, Mr. Speaker.
Does
the Minister of Health take any responsibility for the mess the Sask Party has made to our health care system?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Rural
and Remote Health.
Hon. Mr. T. McLeod: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Our
government’s health human resources action plan is one of the most ambitious
plans in the country, if not the most ambitious, Mr. Speaker.
If
the members opposite had spent a little more time listening and a little bit
less time talking, they would have heard all of the positive results that we
are seeing from the health human resources action plan, Mr. Speaker. Just last
week we announced 232 new and enhanced full-time positions have been filled in
the rural and remote areas, Mr. Speaker. More than 300 physicians are now
working through our SIPPA [Saskatchewan international
physician practice assessment] program, Mr. Speaker. One hundred and eighteen
applications have been approved through the rural physician incentive program
for up to $200,000, Mr. Speaker. We have 300 new full-time CCAs
[continuing care aide] working in this province, Mr. Speaker. This plan is
working and the results can be seen all across our province. Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have
serious doubts about how those answers are going to go over with the people of
Moose Jaw in the upcoming election, but I guess we’ll see, Mr. Speaker.
Saskatchewan
people wait longer than anywhere else in Canada for knee and hip replacements.
It was that way before this government gave a major Sask
Party donor a sweetheart deal to perform these procedures in Calgary, and it
was that way after this government gave a major Sask
Party donor a sweetheart deal to perform these procedures in Calgary. Worst in
the nation, Mr. Speaker.
So
I’d like the minister to walk us through his thought process. Why did this
tired and out-of-touch government give a Calgary-based Sask
Party donor a sole-source contract valued at $6 million just so we could
still be last in the nation? Why not put that money into building up
Saskatchewan hospitals, Saskatchewan health care workers, building capacity
here at home? And did the former Finance minister, Kevin Doherty, have anything
to do with it?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Mr. Hindley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This government
is committed to pursuing all options when it comes to improving access to
joint-replacement surgeries for patients in our province, Mr. Speaker. That
includes some of these being done out of province, as we’ve talked about
earlier, Mr. Speaker, in this Chamber.
But
in addition to that, further to the member’s question, we are also making
significant investments, record investments into surgeries and surgical
capacity here in this province. As I’ve said before, nearly $670 million
into doing more surgeries here in our province, supporting our surgical teams
and networks across Saskatchewan, in Saskatoon and Regina and our regional
centres, that perform surgeries for people right across this province.
We’re
going to continue to make sure that we look at doing everything we can to make
sure that patients get the surgeries they need on a timely basis, Mr. Speaker.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway: — Mr. Speaker, the Health minister
can’t keep his story straight, and we need to only look to his words for proof.
First
he said in here there was an RFP [request for proposal], a “open, transparent
process,” a competition for this contract. From Hansard he also said,
and I quote, “It’s my understanding that Mr. Doherty did not lobby on this, was
not involved in this particular RFP.”
Then
he said out there it was a sole-source contract, but don’t worry. Apparently SaskBuilds and Procurement looked into other firms, and
this Sask Party donor was the only option.
Prove
it. Will the Health minister release the SaskBuilds
and Procurement records? Yes or no?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Mr. Hindley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To the
member’s question, and first of all, I will say this. I made a correction as
soon as I could that day, that afternoon, 10 minutes after the proceedings in
the Chamber, Mr. Speaker, when talking to the media. And I made a further
clarification the following day, Mr. Speaker.
Now
I would say this. As I mentioned last week, the chief procurement officer for SaskBuilds had been consulted on this particular initiative
and was satisfied that this was the appropriate course of action to take, Mr.
Speaker. Because of the nature of it, Mr. Speaker, we were looking to do
everything we could to address the wait-list of those that are waiting for
surgeries, known as the long-waiters on the surgical waiting lists that have
built up over the course of the pandemic, Mr. Speaker.
Since
that point in time, we’ve made significant progress in reducing those numbers,
shortening the waiting list, shortening the waiting times. Still work to do,
Mr. Speaker. We’re committed to getting that done so people can get their
surgeries on time, Mr. Speaker.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms.
Conway: — Mr. Speaker, this is why people are fed up.
First the minister said former Sask Party MLA and
former Finance minister-turned-lobbyist Kevin Doherty was never in the picture.
Then he admitted to meeting with Doherty but about something else, but he can’t
remember about what. And later when pressed by reporters for specifics, the
minister said he’s had so many meetings he just can’t recall what they were
about.
He’s had the weekend to look through his call and
meeting logs. To the minister: since Kevin Doherty started lobbying him in May
2022, did he ever speak to him? Did he ever exchange emails with him? Did he
ever meet with him about the surgical backlog? Yes or no?
The
Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Mr. Hindley: — Thank you,
Mr. Speaker. This member opposite, she has quite a track record, Mr. Speaker,
of the things that she says in this House. Mr. Speaker, the character
assassinations that she issues in this House, Mr. Speaker . . .
The
Speaker: — That’s out of order, Minister. That’s out of
order. Go ahead, but just warning you.
Hon.
Mr. Hindley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The lobbyists registry
is a list of registered lobbyists who have made an application to the registry
to be able to lobby politicians, to be able to lobby MLAs on this side of the
House and on that side of the House. Just because a lobbyist is listed on the
registry does not necessarily mean, Mr. Speaker, that they have met with MLAs.
Mr. Speaker, I could point to the member opposite,
her own record. For example, I think she has multiple entries there on the
lobbyists registry of meeting with a tobacco company. Did she meet with them? I
don’t know, Mr. Speaker. So I would say this, Mr. Speaker: it’s important to be
clear about what the lobbyists registry is and what it isn’t, Mr. Speaker.
The
Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms.
Conway: — Mr. Speaker, people don’t want to see him
pointing fingers. They want to make sure his hands are on the wheel. First
there was no RFP. Then there wasn’t. First there was no meeting. Then there
were several meetings, but 100 per cent definitely about something else other
than this, but he can’t recall what.
But here’s one thing the Health minister was half
right about, Mr. Speaker. On Thursday he said, “. . . the Minister of
Health does not sign contracts. The Minister of Health, we don’t do that.” Well
technically that’s correct, Mr. Speaker. It’s the Premier who signed the order
in council authorizing the $6 million sweetheart deal. I have a copy right
here.
[14:15]
So
is the Health minister blaming the Premier for signing this dodgy donor deal
with Doherty?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Health minister.
Hon. Mr. Hindley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Due to, as I
mentioned before, due to a slowdown in non-urgent procedures during the
pandemic and non-essential health care services, certain procedures and health
care services were slowed down. That includes surgeries, Mr. Speaker, to at
which point it actually reached about 36,000 people waiting for surgeries in
the middle of the pandemic as a result of surgical slowdowns, Mr. Speaker.
We
continue to make significant progress reducing that, the vast majority of these
procedures being done in this province, but also utilizing other options to
make sure that we can get long-waiters who are waiting for whether it’s hip
surgeries or knee surgeries — through this example here, through Clearpoint in Calgary, Mr. Speaker — giving them options to
be able to get those surgeries done, Mr. Speaker. We’ve now reduced that
wait-list significantly. We’re going to continue to make those investments, Mr.
Speaker, so we can get these surgeries completed.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway: — Mr. Speaker, there’s more questions
than answers with this sole-sourced contract. But there are still no answers
when it comes to the Thriftlodge motel. On Thursday,
the Sask Party ordered its response to my question on
that issue. That means instead of exercising their option to answer it today,
they’re going to kick it down the road six months.
What
were those questions, you may ask, Mr. Speaker? “To the Minister of Social
Services, the amount of money the ministry paid out to the Thriftlodge
Motel . . . in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023.” It doesn’t get any
simpler than that.
How
does the Sask Party justify delaying the answer to
these six numbers six months from now?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Social
Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky: — Mr. Speaker, we’ve been over this
many times. Mr. Speaker, the member opposite asked for some information late
last year. A lot of work was undertaken by the ministry to get that
information. There was a subsequent ask of more information, Mr. Speaker. That
number and those numbers that were asked for by the member are coming very
shortly. That’s something I’ve committed to, Mr. Speaker.
In
the meantime, Mr. Speaker, we’ve made some improvements or changes to our
procurement policy in terms of getting quotes and as well as an RFP process for
a block of hotel rooms in Regina and Saskatoon, Mr. Speaker.
There’s
going to be a opportunity for even more questions this afternoon in estimates,
Mr. Speaker. I look forward to that process.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway: — Mr. Speaker, unacceptable. There are
nearly 2,000 people that work for that ministry. There are dozens of political
staff for the Sask Party in this building alone.
Surely it shouldn’t take weeks and weeks and months and months for the Minister
of Social Services to provide basic information about public dollars being paid
out to hotels connected to Sask Party hotels. Plus,
his colleague sits in this Chamber; they literally share an office. He doesn’t
even have to pick up the phone. He can just walk down the hallway and ask him.
These
guys are so lost, Mr. Speaker. They’re losing their starting lineup. They’re
limping from crisis to crisis, mess to mess, and this mess stinks. How much
longer will people have to wait before the minister shines some sunlight on
this waste of public dollars?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Social
Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky: — Mr. Speaker, the member won’t have
to wait very long at all, Mr. Speaker. In terms of smear volume 2, Mr. Speaker,
totally ignored your admonition at the beginning of this sitting day, Mr.
Speaker.
In
terms of thousands of public employees, Mr. Speaker, dedicated public employees
in the public service, is she suggesting in the Ministry of Social Services
that we pull off from front-line child care protection, Mr. Speaker? Is that
what she’s talking about today?
She’s
asking me to use the public service front-line caseworkers, child protection
workers, bring them all into Regina to get the information for a public smear
campaign, a political vendetta, by that member, Mr. Speaker. That is the worst
idea I’ve ever heard. I’ve heard a lot of bad ones from the NDP, but that’s
right at the top.
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from
Saskatoon Meewasin.
Mr. Teed: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. In
the first three months of 2024, 113 people died of suspected overdose. It’s a
shocking number. It’s one a day, more than one a day, Mr. Speaker — one mother,
one father, a sister, a brother dying every single day this year.
Mr.
Speaker, we need more than talking points and blame-casting to fix this crisis.
We need solutions. We need to get people into treatment, and we need to keep
people alive long enough to get there. Mr. Speaker, when will we see an
evidence-based plan from that minister to stop the record-setting overdose
deaths in our province?
The Speaker: — I recognize the Minister of Mental
Health and Addictions.
Hon. Mr. T. McLeod: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. You know, on
this side of the House, we agree that action needs to be taken to address
mental health and addictions, and that’s why we introduced an action plan on
mental health and addictions in October of 2023, Mr. Speaker.
Since
that time we have made announcements that directly impact individuals who are
battling addiction, Mr. Speaker. We have introduced a provincial drug alert
system. We have overdose outreach teams. We have a free naloxone take-home kit
program that has trained more than 40,000 individuals to administer naloxone.
And with that program, Mr. Speaker, 10,000 overdoses have been reversed. That’s
10,000 lives saved in Saskatchewan, Mr. Speaker.
The
member opposite speaks about treatment. Absolutely we need individuals to reach
treatment, and that’s why we are more than doubling the number of treatment
spaces that we are offering in this province. We are making it easier for
individuals to access those treatment spaces, Mr. Speaker. And when they are
there, Mr. Speaker, we are wrapping supports around them through
recovery-oriented systems of care so that we can save lives, heal families, and
build stronger communities. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms. Harpauer that Bill
No. 156 — The Tobacco Tax Amendment Act, 2024 be now read a
second time.]
The
Speaker: — I recognize the member from Saskatoon Eastview.
Mr.
Love: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’m proud to be on my
feet to put a few comments on the record today in the debate on Bill 156, The
Tobacco Tax Amendment Act of 2024.
Certainly, Mr. Speaker, we’re all aware — at least
we should be, I think — in this Assembly on the damaging impacts that tobacco
use can have. We know the impacts in terms of our health, on individuals, on
families, on communities, incredible cost that comes with that both in terms of
the human cost and the financial costs in our health system. We should all be
well versed in those matters.
So with that in mind I do stand in support of
regulating the sale of tobacco products, and I think it’s good to see some of
these amendments that are coming in with Bill 156. In particular the
introduction of a licence that anybody who wants to sell tobacco products,
whether that’s retail, wholesale, resale, and that folks can’t acquire for
retail from a wholesaler without a licence. So regulating that flow of tobacco
products as they get to consumers I think is a positive sign.
Certainly there’s lots to consider here, but I want
to note just a couple of things. As someone who has spent a lot of time as a
teacher in the classroom, the need to consider changes to the regulation of
vaping
products is certainly something that I support as well. I know that it’s a
trend that — at least with, I think, the most recent information any of us have
— a trend that’s still on the rise and certainly impacting young people.
And
we know that somebody who gets introduced to vaping is, while in itself is
damaging, can also be a way to increase their use of tobacco products. So again
I think that the regulation of this through legislation at the provincial level
is something that we’ve offered bipartisan support for.
I
want to give some credit to young people in the province that have raised
concerns in particular about vaping and the Youth4Change
movement. And several of these young people have come here to their Assembly to
make their case; that’s been powerful in the past.
And
so again, Mr. Speaker, when it comes to regulating tobacco through these
changes, I do stand in support but will listen with interest as my colleagues
in opposition put comments on the record and eventually it comes to our critic
to raise more questions in the future. But at this time I will move that we
adjourn debate on Bill 156, The Tobacco Tax Amendment Act. Thank you.
The Speaker: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
The Speaker: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms. Harpauer that Bill No. 157 — The Income Tax
Amendment Act, 2024 be now read a second time.]
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from
Saskatoon Eastview.
Mr. Love: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This is bill
two of two for me today in adjourned debates and happy to again put a few
remarks on the record here for Bill 157, The Income Tax Amendment Act of
2024.
In
summary, off the top I do think it’s important that we maintain this low tax
rate for small businesses. We know that many small businesses continue to feel
the impact of recovering from several years that were very hard on small
businesses, small businesses that are so important in all the communities that
we represent in the 61 seats in this Assembly, Mr. Speaker.
We
all know these folks well. These small business operators are often pillars of
our communities. They donate to local organizations. They volunteer. They provide
so many goods and services that we all know to be important in our communities.
And so I think it is a good call to maintain that low tax rate, I believe for
one more year with a restoration date of July 1st, 2025 according to this
amendment.
While
we think it’s important to provide this extended relief and support for small
businesses, we also recognize that many families in Saskatchewan have not seen
the support that they need to address the cost-of-living crisis. We know that
families — it’s been well canvassed in this Assembly — are struggling to afford
healthy food for their homes, for their children. We know that 57 per cent of
people in Saskatchewan recognize that they’re worse off now than they were a
year ago. And we think that people and families need relief too.
But
with that in mind, Mr. Speaker, I’ll voice my support for these amendments but
continue to look forward to comments throughout the debate on Bill No. 157 from my colleagues
in opposition and anyone who is going to join in on this debate. But at this
time, I’ll move that we adjourn debate today for Bill 157, The Income Tax
Amendment Act, 2024. Thank you.
The
Speaker: — The member has moved to adjourn debate.
Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
The Speaker: — Carried. Just while I’m on my feet,
as Speaker, I have received literally hundreds and hundreds of text messages
from the Government House Leader, the Deputy Government House Leader, and
occasionally from the Minister of Finance.
I’d
just like to read into the record what the Minister of Finance just sent me:
Randy, if you can blatantly lie, tarnish reputations of
elected, unelected individuals with innuendoes but no proof, we have no avenue
to push back, then this Assembly has become a joke and a stage for an
opposition puppet show. Disappointing.
First
of all, if you want to make a point of order, get on your feet. And I ask the
Minister of Finance to withdraw and apologize for this text and any others that
you may feel inclined to send me off the record.
Hon. Ms. Harpauer: — I withdraw and apologize.
The Speaker: — Go ahead, Kathy.
Deputy Clerk: — Government orders, adjourned
debates, item no. 3. Resume debate on the second reading motion for Bill No. 158, The Saskatchewan
Commercial Innovation Incentive (Patent Box) Amendment Act . . .
The Speaker: — I ask the Government House Leader to
stand and withdraw and apologize for that comment too. I’m not deaf.
Hon. Mr. J. Harrison: — I’m not.
The Speaker: — Mr. Jeremy Harrison, I hereby name
you for disregarding the authority of the Chair. Pursuant to rule 57(2), the
member is suspended from the service of the Assembly for the remainder of the
sitting day.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Mr. J.
Harrison that Bill No. 158 — The Saskatchewan Commercial
Innovation Incentive (Patent Box) Amendment Act, 2024 be now
read a second time.]
[14:30]
The Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina Coronation Park.
Mr.
Burki: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s my honour
and pleasure to be on my feet to be a part of the debate on Bill 158,
Saskatchewan commercial innovation incentive, patent, amendment Act,
2024.
We all know about that. We can get talent
into our province by encouraging them with somehow, some way, by credit and
recognizing their research in our province. And it is the key thing to attract
people, research-oriented people, into our province. So I will say that it is a
really good one, and the bill is saying about that the credit should be given
from seven years to eight years. I will say we have to increase more than that
because we have to encourage talented people into our province.
Personally I will tell you one of my good
friends, he was with me at university back home, he did an IT [information
technology] masters over there and he went to Germany for doing his Ph.D.
[Doctor of Philosophy] in Germany. When I moved over here in 2008 to
Saskatchewan, he came along with me as well, as a friend, but he got a job at
SGI.
When he got a job at SGI he did a lot of
innovation things over there, but due to IT there was not having a lot of
infrastructure as we have in Ontario, so unfortunately he moved to Ontario and
right now he is doing a lot of patents, and he has done a lot of research, and
he is doing . . . [inaudible] . . . great job over here.
While we think over here in our province — we
are an agriculture province — we have to attract people, research people that
are doing research in agriculture, in mining, to make sure that they can have
to do research. And they do their patents and we have to give them the credit,
the maximum that we can do it, to make sure we can retain people over here.
And, Mr. Speaker, I was reading a book. I
don’t know how authentic that book was; it was saying that Elon Musk at one
time was in Moose Jaw. I wish we could have encouraged him to stay over here.
We would be the best person . . . [inaudible] . . . over
here and we would be more renowned for that.
So these are all the things that attracting
people, so I will be passing on that for further debate to the member for
critic, so he will be looking into that in depth. With that I will adjourn the
debate for now on Bill 158. Thank you.
The
Speaker: — Member has moved to adjourn debate. Is it
the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
The
Speaker: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms. Harpauer that Bill
No. 159 — The Revenue and Financial Services Amendment Act, 2024 be
now read a second time.]
The
Speaker: — I recognize the member from Regina
Coronation Park.
Mr.
Burki: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s my pleasure
and honour to stand on my feet on Bill 159, The Revenue and Financial Services Amendment Act, 2024.
We
all know that the government, all government’s run by taxes. People should have
to pay taxes. Corporate companies have to pay taxes. And it is not acceptable
for any company that they are not paying taxes. So we make sure that we can go
for some kind of plan to make sure, if they are having trouble or something
like that, we are not putting them to the corner as well.
And
at the end of the day, the businesses in our province, they are providing jobs
and they are providing a lot of incentive to people, and that’s what our
province should be. So for that purpose, we have to make sure we can give them
as much as we can do that, but definitely our province is run by those taxes.
So I will say I’m in favour of that, that we should have to chase those people.
And whatever incentive or whatever things can be done, we have to be taking
care of that.
On
the top of that, we have to be looking into the accountability as well.
Everybody is responsible for that. Big corporate companies, directors, and all
those people, they are in there. If there is any payable remittance or any
credits to government, they have to pay in time. And if some companies can’t do
that, just in case something happens, the government have to go with a plan.
The
critic will be taking in-depth look into this bill. So with that I would return
debate on Bill 159, The Revenue and Financial Services Amendment Act, 2024.
Thank you.
The Speaker: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
The Speaker: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Mr. J.
Harrison that Bill No. 160 — The Immigration Services Act be now read a second time.]
The
Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Mr. Teed: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
It’s an honour to be on my feet today entering into adjourned debates on Bill No. 160, The Immigration Services
Act. Mr. Speaker, this is an important piece of legislation coming before
our Chamber, an important piece of legislation that will continue to ensure the
greatest integrity of Saskatchewan’s role in our country’s immigration system.
Mr.
Speaker, the integrity of our immigration system should be a priority for every
level of government. And I think that Saskatchewan people will be very, very
happy to see that we as a province are taking steps to ensure that our
immigration system is serving the people who are looking to access it, Mr.
Speaker.
You
know, we can look to say that Canada is a nation of immigrants. We are
probably, you know, one of the nations of the world that does this the best. We
have built our nation by welcoming people to our country for opportunity, Mr.
Speaker, and I am so proud to be standing in my place and speaking to a piece
of legislation that will further that work here in this House, Mr. Speaker.
Now
I won’t talk for too long on Bill No. 160, but you know, for the folks
watching at home I think it’s important to see some of the important pieces of
this legislation. It has a lot of ways that we are, as the government is
proposing, to tighten up those systems. It talks about, you know, everything
from anyone recruiting foreign workers must have a licence, you know, unless
they’re doing it for free or for a government association. So if you’re, you
know, a private entity looking to profit from recruiting immigration, you must
secure a licence; you must have reputability. You know, we see in this Act
clauses that the ministry can provide those licences or certificates or they
can deny and revoke those certificates based on non-compliance, financial
insecurity, or illegal predatory conduct, Mr. Speaker.
You
know, there’s also a list of what recruiters and consultants and employees
cannot do. You can’t lie about jobs. You can’t threaten the worker or their
family. You can’t keep their passport. You can’t charge lien or wages on the
worker for them to get the job. You can’t force a worker to go through a
recruiter, etc. Mr. Speaker, important line-by-line for this legislation.
Contracts have to be clear and understandable to the worker. The ministry has
full investigation powers.
I
could go on, Mr. Speaker, but these are important parts of this legislation.
You know, Mr. Speaker, as I’ve said, it’s very important and it’s nice to see
the government put forward legislation that is protecting, aiming to protect
vulnerable foreign workers.
You
know, Mr. Speaker, on that note though, I think it’s important that while we’re
talking about important regulations as far as immigration standards in our
province, we play a role with the Sask immigrant
nominee program in a larger immigration system that is a federal
responsibility, but we have that role in it. I would really like to have the
conversation in this Chamber about retaining those immigrants that we’re
bringing into the province, Mr. Speaker. And I’m going to look at some rates
here that we’ve seen under five years of the Sask
Party government as it relates to immigrant retention rates.
Mr.
Speaker, Saskatchewan’s five-year immigration retention rate has dropped to
57.9 per cent. That was from nearly — the last five years before that — 74 per
cent. Mr. Speaker, that is the third-worst immigration retention rate in the
country. The previous five-year rate was the fourth-worst immigration retention
rate in the country. Mr. Speaker, Saskatchewan now loses 42 of every 100
immigrants coming to Saskatchewan. After they’re a while, they leave.
You
know, Mr. Speaker, I recently had the opportunity to meet . . . I had
a Zoom call meeting with RBC Royal Bank. They have set up an immigrant
retention team in Saskatchewan, in Regina, specifically oriented to ensuring
that when immigrants land in Saskatchewan, they have an appropriate education
about how our financial system works because in many cases it’s quite different
than in a previous country.
They
work to make sure that those folks have access to information, appropriate
education on how credit works in Saskatchewan, ensures that they’re set up with
bank accounts, that they know how those bank accounts work and the debit cards.
Mr. Speaker, fantastic work. I know it’s probably happening at all of our big
banks, but I was . . . really appreciated to be invited to speak with
this group.
Now,
Mr. Speaker, in that meeting they told me something that was actually kind of a
gut punch. They said, people that we’re dealing with call Saskatchewan Saskatche-exit. That’s what immigrants in Saskatchewan are
calling our province: Saskatche-exit, Mr. Speaker.
Because they are landing here and then they are leaving. They’re leaving this
province.
I
couldn’t believe it, Mr. Speaker. I told them my commitment, our commitment as
an official opposition would be to change that. Mr. Speaker, every single
person landing in Saskatchewan, we should be wrapping our arms around them and
we should be retaining those immigrants.
More
anecdotally, my partner recently started as a real estate agent and has been
working with folks moving to Saskatchewan. And consistently folks who are new
to Canada tell him, we’re buying a house here to build up that equity and in
five years we’re leaving. We’re moving to Calgary. We’re leaving Saskatchewan.
This is a five-year plan for us. And they’re leaving.
Mr.
Speaker, this retention record speaks for itself. So while I welcome absolutely
every means to ensure that we are treating our immigrants with the utmost
dignity and respect and integrity, we have to be having a conversation about
retention. And we have to be addressing some of the worst immigrant retention
rates in the country, Mr. Speaker.
There’s
a couple extra questions that we have, and I know that our critic, the critic
for Immigration, will be doing a lot more consultation work on this file,
speaking with stakeholders and asking important questions in committee. So with
that, Mr. Speaker, with those comments on the record, I will be moving to
adjourn debate on Bill No. 160, The Immigration Services Act.
The Speaker: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members:
— Agreed.
The Speaker: — Carried. I recognize the Government
Deputy House Leader.
Hon. Ms. Carr: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To
facilitate the work of committees, I move that this House do now adjourn.
The Speaker: — The Government Deputy House Leader
has moved to adjourn the House. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the
motion?
Some
Hon. Members:
— Agreed.
The Speaker: — Carried. This House now stands
adjourned till 1:30 tomorrow.
[The
Assembly adjourned at 14:43.]
Published
under the authority of the Hon. Randy Weekes, Speaker
Disclaimer:
The electronic versions of the Legislative Assembly's documents are provided
for information purposes only. The content of the documents is identical to the
printed record; only the presentation differs unless otherwise noted. The
printed versions are the official record for legal purposes.