CONTENTS
Hunting, Fishing and
Trapping Heritage Day
Recognizing Canadian
War Brides and Families
Book by Former
Opposition Leader Details Government COVID Response
Supports for Nurse
Practitioners
Volleyball Player from
Wilkie Achieves International Success
Saskatoon Brewery and
Distillery Seek International Markets
Health Care Staffing and Management of Health Care System
Emergency Hotel Stays
Paid by Social Services
Overdose Deaths and
Treatment for Addictions
Bill No. 150 — The
Securities (Saskatchewan Investors Protection) Amendment Act, 2023
FOURTH
SESSION — TWENTY-NINTH LEGISLATURE
of
the
Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan
DEBATES
AND PROCEEDINGS
(HANSARD)
N.S.
Vol. 65 No. 12A Wednesday, November 15,
2023, 13:30
[Prayers]
The Speaker:
— I would just like to remind everybody that at 1:55 there’s going to be a
SaskAlert, so some of the phones will be going off. Try to mute or shut your
phones off, but there’s always a few that get through.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Southeast.
Hon. Mr. Morgan: — Thank you. Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. It’s my privilege today to rise in the Assembly to introduce an
international delegation. Seated in your gallery is Her Excellency Adriana
Solano Laclé, ambassador of Costa Rica in Canada, and Michelle Corriols,
consular agent in commercial affairs. And I hope I’ve pronounced those somewhat
correctly. They are seated in the front row.
And,
Mr. Speaker, they are here for a number of trade-related missions, both with
the private sector and with the public sector. And I know this is one of their
earlier visits, but we’re hopeful that they will come back here for more and
have further discussions with Trade. And we’d ask that all members of the Assembly
welcome them to the Assembly today.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Crown Investments Corporation.
Hon. Mr. Duncan:
—
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, it’s my pleasure this afternoon to
introduce to you and through you to all members of the Assembly, 20 public
service employees that are seated in the Speaker’s gallery. They’re here today
as a part of the parliamentary program for the public service, and they’ve had
an opportunity to tour the building as well as had briefings presented by
various officials from Legislative Assembly Services and Executive Council.
They’ll be observing proceedings here this afternoon as well as, I believe,
having meetings with yourself and members opposite as well as the government
side.
Mr.
Speaker, participants are employees from the following ministries: Agriculture;
Justice and Attorney General; Health; Social Services; Education; Environment;
the Public Service Commission; Labour Relations and Workplace Safety;
SaskBuilds and Procurement; Parks, Culture and Sport; Status of Women office;
Trade and Export Development; and the Public Safety Agency. And so, Mr.
Speaker, I’d ask all members to join with me in welcoming these public servants
to their Legislative Assembly.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Douglas Park.
Ms. Sarauer:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s my honour to join with the minister opposite in
welcoming this delegation of public servants to their Legislative Assembly.
It’s always a fun day when we have the parliamentary program here. Always very
much enjoy the dialogue that we have after question period, so looking forward
to that opportunity later on today.
From
the bottom of all of our hearts, just let me say a heartfelt thank you for all
of the work that you do in the public service every single day. We all as a
province are indebted to you and benefit from your hard work. I ask all members
to join me in welcoming all of them to their legislature.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Parks, Culture and Sport.
Hon. Ms. L. Ross:
— Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Request leave for extended introductions.
The Speaker:
— Leave has been requested for an extended introduction. Is leave granted?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Speaker:
— Carried.
Hon. Ms. L. Ross:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you, I’d like to introduce some
very important guests seated in the Speaker’s gallery and on the floor of the
Assembly.
Mr.
Speaker, last Saturday, November 11th was Remembrance Day. And as we take time
to remember the courage and sacrifice of our servicemen and women, we cannot
forget the invaluable contributions women made to the efforts of war in Canada
and abroad.
This
past September Regina was host to the 2023 Canadian War Brides & Families
association reunion. I was impressed by the stories and the history shared by
this reunion as we celebrated the lives and the history of the Canadian war
brides in our province. Thousands of brave women who met and married Canadian
servicemen during the First and Second World War moved to Canada and helped
rebuild our communities after the wars. The presence of these women can be seen
and felt in communities across Saskatchewan, and it’s an honour to be able to
recognize their legacy today.
Joining
us today we have Jean Fells, along with her daughter Elaine, grandson Shaun,
relatives Mr. and Mrs. Doug Rodgers. Jean is a war bride originally from
Yorkshire, England who was in attendance at the reunion this September.
Joining
Jean and family we have Heather Salloum, who assisted in planning this year’s
convention in Regina; Harvey Linnen; Brad Hrycyna with the Royal United
Services incorporated. No stranger to the House is retired Brigadier-General
Cliff Walker, and daughters of the war brides and executive members of the
Canadian War Brides & Families, Mary Angus-Yanke, Cheryl Pine, Cher Wadson,
Anna Lynne Sanche, Judi Beasley. Accompanying them is Bernadet Hamill,
executive director of the Status of Women.
And,
Mr. Speaker, a name so familiar to us, former MLA [Member of the Legislative
Assembly], Sask Party cabinet minister June Draude. June continues to serve our
communities as a strong advocate for women and has done amazing work with the
Canadian War Brides & Families association. Mr. Speaker, I ask all members
to join me in welcoming these esteemed guests today. We thank the war brides
for their contribution to our province, and our guests for ensuring their
legacy, the lives, on our future generations is remembered. Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Fairview.
Ms. Mowat:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As a former member of the Canadian Armed Forces I’d
like to join with the minister opposite in welcoming this delegation to their
Assembly today — the Canadian war brides, family members that are involved, the
Royal United Services Institute and group, and Brigadier-General Walker. It’s
so great to see this delegation here today. I want to thank you for your
contributions to our province and to our country, and for continuing to share
the history that is so important to all of us here, you know, especially as we
reflect on Remembrance Day this past week. So I want to ask all members of the
Assembly to join me in welcoming these visitors to their Assembly today.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Kelvington-Wadena.
Mr. Nerlien:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to join with the Minister Responsible for
the Status of Women in welcoming the war brides. And a special welcome to the
former member, the Hon. June Draude, member from Kelvington-Wadena constituency
who served honourably from 1995 to 2016. And more importantly for me, she
served as an incredible mentor. And I so much appreciate everything she’s done,
both for the province but for the constituency and for me. Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Mr. Teed:
—
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you, it’s an honour to
stand in this Chamber and introduce a school group seated in the east gallery
today. It is 17 grade 7 and 8 students from Caswell Community School, who have
their teacher with them, Susan Lutkin, and are chaperoned today by Scott
Woods-Fehr, the president of the Prairie Spirit Teachers’ Association, as well
as someone who is no stranger to this Chamber, Mr. Speaker, the former MLA from
Saskatoon Meewasin, Ryan Meili.
I
want to welcome all these students to their Legislative Assembly, and I look
forward to hearing all of your questions after. And I will be speaking about
the former leader of our party in a member’s statement just shortly. Thank you.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Arm River.
Mr. Skoropad:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I’d just like to join with the minister
and my colleague to welcome Ms. Jean Fells to her Legislative Assembly here. It
was an honour to meet her on the way into the building actually just a few
moments ago and learn that we are actually . . . essentially we’re
neighbours, her being from and spending a considerable amount of her life in
Girvin, Saskatchewan, which is truly in the heart geographically of Arm River
and only a few miles away from Chamberlain, my hometown. So I would just like
to welcome her and her family here to her legislature.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Ms. Beck:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to welcome all the guests to their
Legislative Assembly today, but especially want to join in with the member, the
current member from Saskatoon Meewasin, in welcoming the former member and my
predecessor, Dr. Ryan Meili, to his Legislative Assembly. It’s great to see
Ryan here today, although a bit strange to see you up there in the east
gallery.
And
I will note, Mr. Speaker, as sometimes happens with politicians and perhaps
minister Draude as well, I note that folks who used to serve in this Assembly
often seem more rested when we see them up in the gallery. It’s great to see
both of them.
Great
to see Ryan continuing to do great work in the community. I know that he is
just winding up his book tour with his most recent book, A Healthy Future.
And it’s great to see you finding time to join here with Abe here today. I
would invite all members to join me in welcoming Dr. Ryan Meili to his
Legislative Assembly and in wishing him and Mahli and Abe and Gus all the best
in their new adventures. Thank you.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Environment.
Hon.
Ms. Tell: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I
request leave to make an extended introduction.
The Speaker:
— Leave has been requested for an extended introduction. Is leave granted?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
The Speaker:
— Carried.
Hon. Ms. Tell:
—
To you and through you, Mr. Speaker, and to all members of this Assembly, I’d
like to introduce and welcome some very special guests seated with us today. In
the Speaker’s gallery are several staff members from the Saskatchewan Wildlife
Federation. With us today, we have — and if you could just give us a wave as I
name you — Darrell Crabbe, executive director; Blaine Olfert, program
technician; Lyubov Horpinchenko, accountant; Julia Brown, Canadian Conservation
Corps; Marlee Pyotte, Canadian Conservation Corps; and Courtney Devins,
director of communications and marketing.
Mr.
Speaker, I hope everyone will proudly wear their camo bracelets today that have
been so generously supplied to us by the Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation in
commemoration of Camo Day, which leads off our Heritage Day today. We’re going
to hear a little bit more about this day in a member’s statement. Mr. Speaker,
with this, I would like all members to welcome the staff of the Saskatchewan
Wildlife Federation to their Legislative Assembly. Thanks for joining us.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Walsh Acres.
Mr.
Clarke: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Through you and to you, I’d like to join with the member opposite to welcome
Darrell and the crew from the Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation, a very
important organization in Saskatchewan when it comes to hunting, fishing,
conservation. The work that they do across this province is so valuable.
As
a teacher, Mr. Speaker, I’ve had the privilege to participate in the FinS [Fish
in Schools] program in my classroom for the last five years maybe. And we get
rainbow trout eggs from the fish hatchery at Fort Qu’Appelle. They hatch in our
classroom and so the students get to see the whole process, and then we take
them and release them out at one of the trout ponds either at Southey or at
Buffalo Pound.
So
with that, I’d like to again welcome them. Happy Camo Day. And I ask all
members to join me in welcoming them to their Assembly.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Education.
Hon. Mr.
Cockrill: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, probably we’re all familiar in this House
on bring-your-kid-to-work day. Well, Mr. Speaker, I’m actually doing
bring-your-dad-to-work week. So I’d like to introduce to the Assembly my dad,
Randy, who’s visiting me from BC [British Columbia] this week and had the
pleasure of joining me in Regina this week just to spend some time here at the
legislature and visit some of his connections. Obviously, you know, it’s been
spoken many times how important family is to all of us, whatever side of the
House you sit on, and I can say that my dad’s been definitely one of the most
influential people in my life in helping me get to this place where I am today.
So I’d ask, Mr. Speaker, all members to welcome my dad, Randy, to the
Saskatchewan Legislative Assembly.
[13:45]
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Fairview.
Ms. Mowat:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to join in with the member and Leader of the
Opposition in welcoming the former leader of the opposition, Ryan Meili. I’m
not going to make a big fuss about it — I know he doesn’t want me to — but I
just want to say hello to my friend, Ryan, who happens to be chaperoning today,
and say that it is sad to be moving on in different ways without your
colleagues. Every time someone leaves it always feels strange to see them back.
But you are most welcome here and I do want to thank you for spending some time
with us today.
And
maybe more importantly I want to welcome Abraham Meili, who I consider to be a
friend after all the time we’ve spent together on road trips and at events.
Although I haven’t seen him lately, I did want to embarrass him in front of his
class and welcome him specifically.
So
I want to welcome all of these folks to their Assembly today and thank them for
being here.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Cut Knife-Turtleford.
Mr. Domotor:
— To you and through you, Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to introduce, in your
gallery, Mr. Gerald Aalbers. Give us a wave, Gerald. He’s not only the mayor of
the city of Lloydminster but also the president of the SUMA [Saskatchewan Urban
Municipalities Association] City Mayors’ Caucus and hosting the MLA reception
tonight.
Mr.
Speaker, I know that my colleague who represents Lloydminster has a very good
working relationship with Mr. Aalbers and the city, and always makes time to
have discussions when they have concerns that involve the province. She
continues to ensure the city’s interests are well represented with the
provincial government, as she acts as a very strong advocate on their behalf.
I
personally have known Mr. Aalbers for several years, first meeting him in my
former role as CEO [chief executive officer] for the RM [rural municipality] of
Mervin and now in my role as the MLA for Cut Knife-Turtleford. In the years
that I’ve known Mayor Aalbers, I’ve always found him to be respectful and to
the point, as my constituency borders the city and there have been a few times
where we’ve had some common interests that affect both constituencies.
Mr.
Speaker, I would ask that all members of this Assembly join me in welcoming
Gerald Aalbers to his Legislative Assembly.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Nutana.
Ms. Ritchie:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s a pleasure to be on my feet and also extend
greetings to Mayor Aalbers as well as Mayor Greg Dionne from Prince Albert.
I’ve certainly enjoyed and benefited greatly from my time visiting with both of
these community leaders in their home communities, and so appreciative of the
work that they do in leading their communities and bringing their concerns
forward as part of the mayors’ caucus and here to the Assembly. I’d like to
join with the member opposite in welcoming both Mayor Gerry Aalbers and Greg
Dionne to their Assembly.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of SaskBuilds.
Hon. Mr. Hargrave:
— Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you, I’d like to
introduce, you know, the mayor of Prince Albert. You know, he’s been, I think
he’s three or four terms at least now, maybe five or six, and will probably run
for another three or four terms. But P.A. [Prince Albert] is central to him in
his heart and he works every day, seven days a week. You never go to a function
when you don’t see him there. He’s there. He’s Mr. P.A. as far as we’re
concerned.
There’s
lots on the go in Prince Albert right now, many thanks to the good co-operation
that we’ve had. And we’ve got new hotels, we’ve got new apartment buildings,
new arenas, and it’s going very well. And I always have to use a line that the
mayor always uses, and so I once in a while throw it into a speech of mine: you
can’t spell “paradise” without P.A.
So
I welcome him, and I wish all members to welcome Mayor Dionne to his
legislative chambers.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Prince Albert Northcote.
Ms. A. Ross:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. That was such an eloquent introduction from our
Minister of SaskBuilds. But I too would like to welcome Mayor Dionne to his
Legislative Assembly and thank him for all the good work he’s currently doing
up in our city of Prince Albert. I ask all members to join me in thanking Mayor
Dionne to his Legislative Assembly.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Ms. Lambert:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you and on behalf of the member
from Saskatoon Willowgrove, I’d like to introduce a group of 20 grade 8
students from Dr. John G. Egnatoff School in Saskatoon. Give us a wave. They
are sitting in the west gallery and are accompanied by their teacher, Heather
Reid. I ask all members to join me in welcoming this class to their Legislative
Assembly. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Fairview.
Ms. Mowat:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise once again today to call on the government to
improve mental health services for northern and rural Saskatchewan. These
citizens wish to bring to our attention that the rate of suicide among
Indigenous peoples is three times higher than that of non-Indigenous people,
and that suicide rates for Indigenous people living on-reserve are twice as
high than those living off-reserve. And we know that the historical and ongoing
impacts of colonization, displacement, and intergenerational trauma are related
to these high rates of suicide and that government has a role to play in
destigmatizing mental health and addictions.
I’ll
read the prayer:
We, in the prayer that reads
as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
call on the Government of Saskatchewan to address and work with vulnerable
communities in the North and rural areas and to provide adequate mental health
funding and services for northern and rural Indigenous communities.
This
is signed by individuals from Saskatoon today, Mr. Speaker. I do so present.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Cut Knife-Turtleford.
Mr. Domotor:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today to present the following petition. We,
the undersigned residents of the province of Saskatchewan, wish to bring to
your attention the following: whereas the Trudeau Liberal-NDP [New Democratic
Party] coalition carbon tax is one of the main causes of affordability issues
and inflation in the nation of Canada, and that the federal government has
signed that the carbon tax does affect Canadians differently by issuing an
exemption on home heating oil for Atlantic Canadian provinces; further, that
the people of Saskatchewan, 85 per cent of whom rely on natural gas to heat
their homes, are unfairly left without support by the Liberal-NDP coalition who
continue to drive up the cost of living with their price on carbon.
We, in the prayer that reads
as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
take the following action: to call upon the Government of Canada to immediately
remove the carbon tax from all home heating costs across Canada to reduce
inflation and drive down the rising cost of living faced by all Canadians from
coast to coast.
The
below undersigned are residents of Warman and Macklin. I do so present. Thank
you.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Mr. Teed:
—
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I rise today to present our petition calling
on the Government of Saskatchewan to address the cost-of-living crisis.
The
undersigned want us to know that inflation is the highest it’s been in over
three decades; that half of Saskatchewan residents were living paycheque to
paycheque before transportation and food costs skyrocketed in 2022; that the
Sask Party government’s 32 new tax and fee hikes make life more expensive, all
while harming struggling industries like tourism, culture, and fitness.
While
other provinces have acted, the Sask Party continues to ignore the opposition
calls for a gas price relief plan. Mr. Speaker, cost of living is the number
one issue ranked by Saskatchewan voters, and they continue to see a government
failing to act on this crisis.
I’ll
read the prayer:
We, in the prayer that reads
as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
call on the Government of Saskatchewan to meaningfully address the
affordability crisis in Saskatchewan.
The
undersigned residents live in Regina. I do so present.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Walsh Acres.
Mr.
Clarke: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I
rise today to present our petition calling on the government to fix the rural
health care staffing crisis. The undersigned residents would like to bring to our
attention the following: recruitment and retention of health care professionals
is a particular issue in Saskatchewan’s rural health care facilities, leading
to many emergency room, acute, lab, and X-ray service disruptions. The ongoing
pandemic has created burnout and led to early retirements and resignations
which has rippling effects for small cities and towns.
And
I would argue, Mr. Speaker, that burnout is a real and serious issue facing
health care professionals across this province. We hear it from friends of mine
who work as health care professionals, but from unions and many, many people
working in this industry.
Mr.
Speaker, I’ll read the prayer:
We, in the prayer that
reads as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
call on the Government of Saskatchewan to fix the rural health care crisis.
Mr.
Speaker, the signatories today reside in Regina and Saskatoon. I do so present.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Douglas Park.
Ms. Sarauer:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I stand in the House once again to present a petition
calling for the improvement of labour laws in Saskatchewan. Those who have
signed this petition wish to bring to our attention the following: that even
after the October 1st increase, Saskatchewan’s minimum wage remains the lowest
in Canada at $14 an hour. As well, the official opposition has twice introduced
paid sick leave legislation since the onset of the pandemic, calling for a
minimum of 10 paid sick days each year and 14 days during a public health
crisis; as well paid sick leave has been proven to save employers money while
making workplaces healthier and safer for all workers.
Seventy-one
per cent of workers in Canada have experienced workplace violence and
harassment, and much more needs to be done to ensure that workplaces in
Saskatchewan are harassment free. Mr. Speaker, we have a private member’s bill
before the floor right now. It’s Bill No. 613. We do hope that the
minister takes a look at those provisions seriously and considers passage.
I’d
like to read the prayer:
We, in the prayer that reads
as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
call on the Government of Saskatchewan to improve conditions for Saskatchewan
workers by passing legislation to increase the minimum wage, guarantee paid
sick leave, limit nondisclosure agreements which could silence survivors of
workplace harassment, and require employers to track and report incidents of
violence and harassment in the workplace.
Those
who have signed this petition today come from Weyburn. I do so present.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Nutana.
Ms. Ritchie:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today to present a petition calling on the
government to protect Saskatchewan’s water supply.
The
undersigned residents of the province of Saskatchewan wish to bring to your
attention the following: that water is essential for human health, recreation,
the health of our ecosystems, and our economy; that the research from the
University of Regina shows the water quality of Saskatchewan lakes is getting
worse.
I
will read the prayer as follows:
We request that the Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan work to actively protect Saskatchewan waters from current and
future threats to our valuable water supply.
This
petition is signed by the residents of Fort Qu’Appelle. I do so present.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Melville-Saltcoats.
Mr. Kaeding: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Today is Hunting, Fishing and Trapping Heritage Day in Saskatchewan. In the
fall of 2009, our government passed The Hunting, Fishing and Trapping
Heritage Act which designates every 15th of November as a day to celebrate
the special role that these activities have played in the lives of generations
of people.
With
more than 250,000 Saskatchewan residents participating in hunting, fishing, and
trapping every year, the Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation is proud to encourage
the celebration of Saskatchewan Hunting, Trapping and Fishing Heritage Day,
otherwise known as Camo Day.
The
abundant fish and wildlife in this province are due to the joint contributions
of licensed hunters, anglers, and trappers who were on the ground supporting
provincial conservation activities. Without these activities, our province
would not enjoy many of the iconic sceneries that we have come to call home.
The
Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation is inviting individuals and businesses to
participate in honouring the individuals impacting conservation and raise
awareness around their contributions to fish, wildlife, and habitat
conservation by wearing camouflage during our 2023 Camo Day celebration.
On
behalf of the Government of Saskatchewan, thank you to the Saskatchewan
Wildlife Federation for their work in conservation and educating the public on
the realities of hunting and fishing in our province. And thank you to the
thousands of hunters, anglers, and trappers who continue to responsibly carry
out their favourite pastimes right here in Saskatchewan.
[14:00]
The
Speaker: —
I recognize the member from Regina Lakeview.
Ms. Beck: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. October 7th was the
deadliest day for Jewish people since the Holocaust. More than 1,200 Israelis
were killed by Hamas, and 240 Israeli civilians remain hostages. To our fellow
Saskatchewan residents from the Jewish community, we grieve this tragic loss
with you and we reiterate our call for an immediate release of all hostages.
And, Mr. Speaker, we see a growing humanitarian
catastrophe today in Gaza. More than 2 million people are lacking basic
necessities as the civilian death toll continues to climb. More than 11,000
Palestinians, over 4,600 of whom are children, have been killed. These are
atrocities. To our fellow Saskatchewan residents from the Palestinian, Arab,
Muslim communities, we grieve this tragic loss with you, and we join in calls
for an immediate ceasefire and for free flow of
humanitarian aid to provide medical supplies, food, fuel, and water to Gazans.
Here
at home we hear from community members of an increased rise in hate and
discrimination, whether it be anti-Semitic, anti-Palestinian, or Islamophobic
hate. Hate in all of its forms has no place in Saskatchewan.
For
many in our province the realities of this war are all too real. This is a time
to call for unity, a time to grieve together, and a time to stand together in
solidarity. Thank you.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Ms. Lambert:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, many Canadian families and communities
count themselves richer for the contributions of the thousands of war brides
from both the First and Second World War who made Canada their home.
There
were an estimated 48,000 women who met and married Canadian servicemen during
the Second World War. We salute this remarkable group of women who fell in
love, followed their hearts, and made a new home in this country. We can only
imagine how heart wrenching it would be to say goodbye to family and friends
and build a new life in a place you have never been, facing so many unknowns.
That takes strength, determination, and perseverance.
Mr.
Speaker, today we have some family members of war brides joining us and members
from the Canadian War Brides and Families association. The 12th Annual War
Brides Conference took place right here in Regina in September of this year.
Our government is proud to support the legacy of the Canadian war brides by
providing grant funding for a memorial pedestal to be placed in Victoria square
park this year.
We
commend the efforts of the Canadian War Brides and Families organization in
ensuring that these resilient women who are part of Saskatchewan’s foundation
continue to be recognized for their vision, courage, and leadership.
Mr.
Speaker, I’d like to invite all members of this Assembly to join me in thanking
the war brides and their families for their work and vital contributions. Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Mr. Teed:
—
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Today I rise to highlight the incredible work
done by someone who needs little introduction in this Chamber: Dr. Ryan Meili,
who served the people of Saskatchewan as leader of the official opposition,
leader of the Saskatchewan NDP, and MLA for Saskatoon Meewasin.
This
summer myself and several of my colleagues from Regina and Saskatoon had the
opportunity to attend the book tour of A Healthy Future: Lessons from the
Frontlines of a Crisis. It highlights the provincial and federal responses
to the COVID‑19
pandemic with reflections on how to improve our public health care systems in
order to create a healthier and more equitable future for the people in this
province. In it Dr. Meili not only reflects on the COVID‑19 experience in
Saskatchewan but also speaks to the ways in which we can improve our public
health care system.
I
am honoured to speak to the important work that Dr. Meili continues to do for
our province before, during, and since his time as our party leader and as MLA
for Saskatoon Meewasin. Even outside the legislature Dr. Meili continues to be
a fierce advocate for his provincial community.
I
ask all members to join with me in congratulating Dr. Ryan Meili on his
accomplishment of publishing his second book and thanking him for his dedicated
service to the people of our province. Thank you so much.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Martensville-Warman.
Mr. Jenson:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am pleased to rise today to recognize Nurse
Practitioner Week, November 12th to 18th. Mr. Speaker, the number of nurse
practitioners practising in Saskatchewan has increased by over 236 per cent
since 2007. This week we celebrate more than 300 nurse practitioners providing
high-quality primary, acute, and specialty health services across the province.
Through
Saskatchewan’s health human resources action plan, we are working to support
nurse practitioners in the province by expanding their scope of practice,
allowing them to admit and discharge to hospitals and provide comprehensive
care to patients in long-term care; offering nurse practitioner students the
final clinical placement bursary to assist with their last year of schooling;
offering loan forgiveness for nurse practitioners that choose to work in
smaller communities, which was just expanded to an additional five communities,
as noted in the Throne Speech; offering up to $40,000 in relocation granting
for nurse practitioners entering a small community; offering up to $50,000 to
recruit nurse practitioners to a rural location.
Since
2007, Mr. Speaker, we’ve increased nurse practitioner program seats by 50 per
cent. These investments are paying off, because this year’s fall of 2023
convocation was the largest class of USask [University of Saskatchewan]
nurse practitioner graduates from Saskatchewan, the second-largest class of
nurse practitioner graduates to date, as well as the largest number of
self-declared Indigenous nurse practitioner grads in college history.
Please
join me in expressing appreciation to all nurse practitioners working here in
Saskatchewan.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Cut Knife-Turtleford.
Mr. Domotor:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Isaiah Mamer from Wilkie, a recent Queen Elizabeth II
Jubilee recipient, has done it again. On May 30th of this year, Isaiah
qualified to be on the U21 [under 21] roster for Volleyball Canada.
Isaiah
was part of a team that included 15 other players from Canada that stayed,
competed, and trained in Ottawa to be ready to compete in the July tournaments.
Isaiah played with and competed against players who were not only the best in
Canada but the best in the world, Mr. Speaker.
The
Volleyball Canada team played in the NORCECA [North, Central America and
Caribbean Volleyball Confederation] Men’s U21 Pan American Cup in La Habana,
Cuba in early July, placing third in the event, and then off to the FIVB
[Fédération Internationale de Volleyball] Men’s U21 World Championship in
Manama, Bahrain in mid-July, placing 11th in the world.
Mr.
Speaker, Isaiah expressed gratitude to all those who have helped him in his
journey and career goals, including his coaches, teammates, mentors, role
models, and family. Isaiah was also named 2022 Saskatchewan Volleyball 18U
[under 18] Male Athlete of the Year.
In
January of 2023, I had the distinct pleasure of presenting Isaiah a Queen
Elizabeth II Platinum Jubilee Medal. Isaiah is not only an incredible athlete
but also continually gives back to his community.
Mr.
Speaker, I ask that all members of this Assembly join me in congratulating
Isaiah on his volleyball pursuits and wish him well as he continues to push
towards his dreams and goals. Thank you.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Riversdale.
Mr. Friesen:
— It’s another great day in Saskatchewan, Mr. Speaker. I had the pleasure of
joining my colleagues and the Minister of Trade and Export Development in the
Black Fox Farm and Distillery and 9 Mile Brewing reception last night. I’d like
to thank John Cote and Barb Stefanyshyn-Cote, co-owners of Black Fox Farm and
Distillery, as well as Garrett Pederson and Shawn Moen, co-owners of 9 Mile
Legacy Brewing Company. Mr. Speaker, I’d like to recognize these two innovative
companies for their creativity and worldwide reach.
Black
Fox is one of Saskatchewan’s only type 1 distilleries, meaning they produce 100
per cent of their products on site. They have won gold and master-level awards
and are continuously looking to expand their reputation globally. Our province
is dependent on international and interjurisdictional exports, and Black Fox
shows the true importance of trade in our province.
Black
Fox’s commitment to sustainability is a core value of theirs, as they recycle
95 per cent of the water they use. Mr. Speaker, we are so excited that they
will be joining us at COP28 [Conference of Parties 28] this year to share their
sustainability story even further.
9
Mile Legacy Brewing Company is located right in the heart of Saskatoon
Riversdale, Mr. Speaker. We will continue to work with both of them by
connecting them to new markets and partnerships with international offices.
I’d
like all members to join me in thanking them for their great work. Thank you.
The
Speaker: —
I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Ms. Beck:
— Mr. Speaker, this tired and out-of-touch government is lurching from crisis
to crisis in health care. From ambulances to diagnostics to surgeries, people
can’t get the care they need when they need it, and nowhere is that more clear
than at the St. Paul’s emergency room. More than 100 health care workers wrote
to the Premier demanding action to long-standing issues in that hospital. Why
did the Premier have to be publicly shamed through a letter before there was
any action taken to address these long-standing concerns?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Premier.
Hon. Mr. Moe:
—
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Yeah, we did receive a letter from a number
of folks that are working in our health care facilities, Mr. Speaker, and do
appreciate that. The Minister of Health has discussed with the SHA [Saskatchewan Health Authority].
And
I believe the SHA was out yesterday if I’m not mistaken, communicating with the
public and with the Saskatchewan Health Authority staff that are offering the
services, what they’re in the process of doing today to address some of the
pressures that we’re seeing — not just at St. Paul’s in Saskatoon but at many
of our health care centres across the province — what they are looking at doing
over the course of the next number of weeks, and what they’re doing over the
longer term, over the course of the next number of months, to ensure that we’re
able to address the pressures that come through the front door of our health
care facilities across the province, Mr. Speaker.
Those
include additional beds. It includes reallocating staff. It includes hiring
even additional staff in addition to what we have already committed to hiring
in our health care facilities today, Mr. Speaker.
And
so credit to the SHA for taking quick action, swift action, but also
communicating what they are doing with the general public across the province
as well as to those that are working in our facilities.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Ms. Beck:
— Mr. Speaker, the nurses and the health care workers have some pretty
straightforward solutions to the crisis in health care today: end the
short-staffing, stop treating patients in the hallway, and listen to health
care workers.
Mr.
Speaker, none of those will be addressed in that plan that was announced
yesterday. Why not? And when will this tired and out-of-touch government
actually listen to the front-line health care workers and implement the
solutions that they’ve been asking for for months?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Premier.
Hon. Mr. Moe:
—
Mr. Speaker, one of the primary asks was for the addition of beds and staff.
That is actually exactly what the Saskatchewan Health Authority was speaking to
yesterday. I believe the CEO, Andrew Will, was out and talked about the 84
additional beds that are being staffed in Saskatoon; additional emergency
department staffing that is being provided at St. Paul’s emergency department;
three additional ambulances being added to the rotation, Mr. Speaker.
These
are precisely some of the asks that were placed by the staff in the letter that
was provided, Mr. Speaker, and it’s precisely some of the commitments that the
CEO of the Saskatchewan Health Authority had made yesterday as he communicated
that to Saskatchewan people.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Ms. Beck:
— Mr. Speaker, despite those lines from the Premier, it is more and more clear
every day that this government is refusing to listen to front-line health care
workers. Now the Sask Party cooked up a plan over the weekend, but they’re
ignoring the solutions that health care workers have been calling on for months
and years.
Let’s
take the nursing task force. Registered nurses in this province want to work
with the government on a nursing task force to fix the crisis in our health
care system. They called for this back in March, and they called for it again
on the day of the Throne Speech. Why won’t the Premier just say yes to the
nurses and strike this task force today?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Mr. Hindley:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And I want to thank the member opposite for the
question, Mr. Speaker.
This
government takes the work and the value . . . very much values the
work being done by nurses across our province. Myself, the Minister of Rural
and Remote Health, previous ministers of Health have had a number of
opportunities to have engagement with the Saskatchewan Union of Nurses and with
front-line health care providers, Mr. Speaker. And meeting directly with nurses
that are working on the front lines to not only hear from them directly as to
what challenges and some of the pressures that they are facing on the front
lines in our health care facilities, but also in addition to that, to work with
them on solutions.
So,
Mr. Speaker, we’ll continue to engage with SUN [Saskatchewan Union of Nurses]
and other organizations, other health care providers, across Saskatchewan and
make sure we’re delivering the best possible health care we can for the people
of this province.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Ms. Beck:
— Mr. Speaker, it shouldn’t come as any surprise to that minister that nurses
in this province are not feeling very much valued by this tired and
out-of-touch government. In fact, Mr. Speaker, they’re letting so many people
down while they’re wasting public money hand over fist.
[14:15]
Last
month we were joined by Evelyn Harper who was evicted from Sask Housing. Evelyn
checked herself in to the Sunrise Motel at a rate of $132 a night. But when the
hotel found out that the government was going to pay the cost, the rate for
that room jumped from $132 to $200. Mr. Speaker, that’s a jump of 51 per cent.
Does
the Premier think that it’s okay for hotels to charge 50 per cent more when
they find out that taxpayers are footing the bill?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Mr. Speaker, in this particular case and in many cases when there’s an
emergency situation and shelters might be full and there’s not an appropriate
place to put individuals in a temporary situation, we do use hotels on
occasion.
As
time goes on all across the province, Mr. Speaker, our first priority is to
have folks in a warm and safe place to stay. So that is the case that happens
across the province all the time. In terms of this particular situation, this
case has been resolved in terms of finding a place for Evelyn. She’s currently
in a Sask Housing unit, so I’m glad to hear that side of things, Mr. Speaker.
In
terms of the billing, Mr. Speaker, we can certainly look into it. I think it
had something to do with the ministry doesn’t pay deposits, and in this case
when the individual checked in they were asked for that. So it may have been
restated, Mr. Speaker. But we will continue to use hotels when needed. I would
note that hotel usage has declined over the last few years.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— Whew, oof, Mr. Speaker. This case raises serious questions about the
management of public funds and the transparency and actions of that Sask Party
government.
Evelyn
shared the Ministry of Social Services requisition forms and receipts from her
stay at the Sunrise Motel, a hotel that is owned by a member of this
Legislative Assembly, the member for Regina Northeast.
When
she first checked in, she was charged a damage deposit of $200 and a nightly
rate of $119 plus tax — $132 per night taxes included. Then once the staff of
the Sunrise Motel found out that Social Services was paying the cost, the price
went up to 169 per night and then $200 per night. All for the same room in the
same hotel for the same guest who had paid a damage deposit, Mr. Speaker. The
only thing that changed was who was footing the bill.
Is
the Minister of Social Services not concerned that this hotel jacked up the
price once Social Services was paying the cost?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Mr. Speaker, in a general sense we only use hotels when necessary. I would
note, and I believe the member said, that this individual checked into a hotel
on her own previously, and then paid that damage deposit. And then when Social
Services became involved — child and family in this case — because we don’t pay
direct deposit, there was, you know, a restating.
But
we can certainly look into this, Mr. Speaker. We don’t have standing contracts
with any hotels and the ministry works to get the best possible rate. Those
rates fluctuate from time to time based on what’s happening in the market. If
there’s Agribition or Grey Cup or something like that, Mr. Speaker, or a
different weekend for example.
But,
Mr. Speaker, I think what this is really about, unfortunately, is the NDP going
after an hon. member. My understanding is this member is not involved in the
day-to-day decisions . . .
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— Mr. Speaker, Evelyn is just one person who stayed at the Sunrise Motel while
the bill was paid by the Ministry of Social Services using public dollars.
Again she paid a damage deposit, a damage deposit I might add she still doesn’t
have back. But she’s not the only one, Mr. Speaker. I see cases all the time in
my MLA office where people are put up in hotels at public expense.
Are
those charges being inflated too? We don’t know. How much money in total has
the government paid to this hotel, owned by a member of the Sask Party caucus,
since 2020? What nightly rates were charged? If the minister doesn’t have that
answer today, will he commit to tabling it tomorrow?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— In terms of hotel use, Mr. Speaker, we do have hotels that we frequently use
and no contracts as I mentioned before. That could be for emergency situations.
It could be for someone who may have been banned from a hotel, is in town for
medical appointments, whatever it may be, Mr. Speaker, in an emergency
situation. In this case it worked out that we were able to temporarily house
somebody in a hotel and then move them on to more permanent housing. And I’m
glad that that has happened for Ms. Harper.
But,
Mr. Speaker, I don’t have the exact amount of hotel usage. I know it has
steadily come down because of the investments we’ve made on the emergency
shelter side, the complex needs emergency shelter side, as well as supportive
living that we’ve been able to bring forward. And I was able to do that along
with the Minister for Addictions to be able to help our most vulnerable people
here in our province. And so, Mr. Speaker, that usage of hotels has come down
as we’ve increased supports.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— I think I’ll just ask that question again because I’m not sure if we got an
answer or commitment from the minister. How much money in total has the
government paid to this hotel, which is owned by a Sask Party member, since
2020? Every year since 2020, what nightly rates were charged? And if he doesn’t
have that information today, will he commit to providing it to this Legislative
Assembly tomorrow?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Mr. Speaker, I don’t have the breakdowns of which hotels are used and for how
many nights, etc. I do know the trend is coming down. We’d spend about, in ’23‑24,
my understanding is about $850,000 on hotel stays in the province. Again that’s
come down with the more supports we’ve been able to come up with, Mr. Speaker.
But
again I think this is really about the NDP going after an hon. member in this
House, Mr. Speaker. These are serious and unproven allegations. I’m certainly a
little . . . I’m disappointed but not surprised the NDP would come up
with this line of attack, Mr. Speaker. We’re all hon. members in this House,
and you know, that is what we expect from all members in this House and in
every case.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— I couldn’t agree more that these are serious allegations, Mr. Speaker. These
raise serious questions. And I’ve asked the minister to make undertakings to
this Legislative Assembly to provide facts to this Legislative Assembly, to
table those facts, and he has refused for a second time to do that, Mr.
Speaker.
We’re
opposed to the total lack of oversight of these public dollars being mismanaged
and wasted. When Evelyn checked in, she was paying $132 per night for her room.
Had Evelyn continued to pay out of pocket, that rate wouldn’t have changed for
her 15‑night stay. But when the staff learned that the people of
. . . [inaudible interjection] . . . I do know that. I do
know that. The hotel told Evelyn that is the case. But when the staff learned
that the people of Saskatchewan were picking up the tab, the price went up over
50 per cent.
This
isn’t right. The public deserves answers, and the minister is on record
refusing to table those answers. Why doesn’t the ministry have any procedures
in place? Will he commit to tabling the policies of his ministry relevant to
hotel stays?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Mr. Speaker, we can certainly look into if we have this information within
the ministry. I have mentioned we spend about $850,000, and that fluctuates
throughout the year; in particular in the wintertime, those numbers do go up.
And our key here in all these situations is to keep people safe and comfortable
and warm, and minimize the disruption in their lives certainly as much as
possible.
The
ministry I know works to get the best rates possible — we don’t have standing
contracts — but again those rates fluctuate. Anybody, you know, who’s tried to
book a hotel on weekends or at certain times of the year . . . I
don’t know in this case exactly, but hotel rates do fluctuate from time to
time, Mr. Speaker.
But
again disappointing that the NDP is impugning an hon. member of this House.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— Mr. Speaker, the question was, will the minister table all policies around
placing Social Services clients in hotels? If he doesn’t have them today, will
he commit to tabling them tomorrow?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Well, Mr. Speaker, I can’t say on the floor of the Assembly if we have the
exact breakdowns. We’ll certainly look into that.
I
don’t think tomorrow would be reasonable in terms of three years of information
that the member just asked for. That might be a little difficult to do, Mr.
Speaker. But you know, we’ll endeavour to look into it and try and get that
information.
But
as I said, Mr. Speaker, we do use hotels in emergency situations. We do spend a
certain amount of dollars in that area. Of course we spend a lot of public
dollars on looking after our most vulnerable in our emergency shelters.
We’ve
been able to increase those amount of beds in our province, and you know, we’re
going to have more announcements in the near future about how we’ve been able
to work with the municipalities, work with our CBO [community-based
organization] sector to be able to increase supports for those that need it
immediately, and longer term for our most vulnerable people.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— Mr. Speaker, we’re not opposed to finding emergency housing for people in
crisis. Certainly not. We are opposed to a total lack of transparency and
oversight when it comes to public management of funds.
Mr.
Speaker, the question for the minister was, will he table the ministry policies
around hotel use? I’m not sure if we heard a clear answer to that. He says he
needs more time to go through the receipts in terms of what the ministry has
contracted with the Sunrise Motel.
What
does he think will be a reasonable timeline? And will he commit to table those
numbers when he has them? Whenever he thinks . . . You know, I don’t
want to be too ambitious in my request. Will he commit to tabling those when he
has them, Mr. Speaker? We need some clear answers.
The
ministry puts hundreds of people up in hotels every year. This has been going
on for years. We know that they’ve spent nearly a million on hotels through the
income assistance strain. We would like to know what they spend globally in the
Ministry of Social Services on hotels yearly . . .
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Mr. Speaker, for these estimates-type questions, we’ll endeavour to look at
what we have, if we do have that exact breakdown and then, you know, share that
information if we do have it.
Again
we’re working hard to increase the amount of spaces we have for some of our
most vulnerable citizens, not only on the emergency side, complex needs
emergency side, supportive living, using Sask Housing units to be able to
provide some of these supports out there in our province, all across our
province.
There’ll
be more announcements in the coming days as we work with our municipal
partners, our CBO partners to continue to help individuals who rely on the
ministry as well as all the people out there who help those people, as well as
sometimes in emergency situations using a hotel.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— Mr. Speaker, Evelyn Harper isn’t the only one who has been put up at the
Sunrise Motel by Social Services. I’m told the ministry regularly directs
clients to the Sunrise Motel, a hotel that is owned by a Sask Party MLA.
Can
the minister confirm that this is a hotel that the Ministry of Social Services
regularly contracts with? Can he confirm how many Social Services clients have
been put in this hotel each year for the last five years, and what nightly
rates were charged? How much public money has been spent housing vulnerable
people at the Sunrise Motel?
Again
if the minister doesn’t have that information today, will he commit to
providing it tomorrow or tabling it as soon as possible?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Mr. Speaker, I’m not aware of what hotels in general the ministry uses day to
day or right across the province. They have several that they frequently use. I
imagine in this case, wouldn’t surprise me if this was the only case that the
ministry would use to house someone in a temporary state, but I don’t know
that. I don’t have that information here with me in the House. We can take a
look and see if we do have those breakdowns.
[14:30]
But
again, Mr. Speaker, we’re working hard to help individuals with whatever
challenges they may have in their lives. Part of that is hotel usage. The rates
may fluctuate as we all know, Mr. Speaker, and again we can look into this
particular stay. But again it’s unfortunate that the reputation is being put
into question for an hon. member of this Assembly.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— Okay, Mr. Speaker. The minister says he doesn’t know if the ministry
regularly contracts with the Sunrise Motel or if this is the only case where he
has. So this is an easy one: will the minister undertake to go back today and
find out if the ministry regularly contracts with the Sunrise Motel and provide
an answer to this Legislative Assembly tomorrow?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Mr. Speaker, in terms of standing contracts, there are to my knowledge and my
understanding — I just heard about this case a few hours ago, or this entire
situation — there’s no contracts with hotels. And there are ones that the
ministry regularly uses, but I don’t know the exact details or the exact
breakdowns. We’ll look and see if we have that information that we can share
publicly.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Ms. Conway:
— Mr. Speaker, time and time again this tired and out-of-touch government has
shown through their actions how little they care about safeguarding public
money. Saskatchewan people work hard for their money. They don’t want to see
public dollars wasted because of this government’s mismanagement.
The
combination of the steep rate increase and the fact that the hotel in question
is owned by a government member raises serious questions, questions to which
we, the opposition, as well as the public, the Saskatchewan people, deserve
answers to. As MLAs we are held to a higher standard, and we have a duty to
maintain the confidence and trust of the public in government affairs, Mr.
Speaker. Public dollars shouldn’t be wasted on inflated hotel costs. They
should be used to provide housing to vulnerable people.
Doesn’t
the minister understand how wrong it is to stick Saskatchewan people with the
bill for inflated hotel costs?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Mr. Makowsky:
— Mr. Speaker, my understanding, once again, is this member is not involved in
the day-to-day operations of this particular hotel. The ministry works to get
the best rates possible in general; however rates do fluctuate, Mr. Speaker.
In
terms of the housing side, we work very hard to improve units. We’re doing that
every day. We have several programs that we are able to increase the amount of
units that are under construction, particularly those that are needed for
supportive housing. That work will continue. We work hard, work with
third-party partners to make best use of Sask Housing units, and that work
continues each and every day.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Fairview.
Ms. Mowat:
— Mr. Speaker, new numbers from the coroner’s office paint a picture of the
overdose crisis in Saskatchewan. It’s a picture of death and loss impacting so
many families: 202 confirmed overdose deaths and 193 suspected and still under
investigation. At this rate we will surpass the record number of deaths in 2021
of 403.
These
are real Saskatchewan people whose lives matter, hundreds of families whose
lives will forever be changed by the death of a loved one. And it doesn’t have
to be this way. The government could step up and provide resources that are
needed to keep people alive.
When
will this government finally bring forward the resources in an evidence-based
plan to ensure that 2024 will not be another record-breaking year?
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Mental Health and Addictions.
Hon. Mr. T. McLeod: — Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker. And the plan was announced a couple of months ago now. It’s a
five-year plan for mental health and addictions. It’s funded by almost
$50 million, Mr. Speaker, and this plan is focused on treatment and
recovery of individuals who are battling addiction.
We
are more than doubling the number of addictions treatment spaces in this
province, Mr. Speaker. We are making it easier for individuals to access those
treatment spaces. And when they are in treatment, we are focused on a
recovery-oriented system of care, which is meeting these individuals where
they’re at, providing them the care that they need so that we can get them on a
healthy path to recovery. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The Speaker:
— I recognize the Minister of Justice.
Hon. Ms. Eyre:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I will now move second reading of The Securities
(Saskatchewan Investors Protection) Amendment Act, 2023.
Mr.
Speaker, capital markets play a crucial role in our economy, but to maintain a
healthy capital markets industry a strong regulatory system is required. Proper
regulation ensures the integrity of the industry and protects investors. This
bill contains three sets of changes to The Securities Act, 1988 which
will help achieve these goals.
First,
the changes grant designated dispute resolution service providers the authority
to make binding decisions in certain disputes between investors and registered
firms. This change is based on recommendations of the Canadian Securities
Administrators and will substantially harmonize provisions across Canadian
jurisdictions.
In
practice, the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments, or OBSI, is
expected to be designated under the Act to carry out this role. Currently OBSI
can make non-binding recommendations in disputes between firms and investors,
and if a firm refuses to comply the only recourse for OBSI is to publish the
refusal.
If
an investor has the necessary resources it is possible to take further action
at one’s own expense, including civil litigation; however consumer advocates
and international reviewers have criticized the lack of enforceability of OBSI’s
decisions. Granting binding decision-making authority to OBSI will level the
playing field between investors and firms who are in dispute and increase
access to fair resolutions for investors.
Secondly,
Mr. Speaker, the changes increase the maximum administrative penalty for
persons or companies who violate Saskatchewan securities laws from 100,000 to
1 million and this increase will align Saskatchewan with most other
Canadian jurisdictions and better achieve the goal of deterring contraventions
of securities laws.
Finally
the changes grant the Securities Commission authority to take additional
measures to ensure compliance with securities laws. For example, this authority
could be used to order the closure of websites operated and used by entities
that contravene Saskatchewan securities laws, or extend an order to third
parties such as social media sites to remove information or advertisements of
users who contravene Saskatchewan securities law from their platforms.
Mr.
Speaker, I am pleased to move second reading of the securities amendment Act,
2023.
The Speaker:
— It has been moved that Bill No. 150 be now read a second time. Is the
Assembly ready for the question? I recognize the member from Regina Douglas
Park.
Ms. Sarauer:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s my honour to rise today and enter into the
debate on Bill No. 150, The Securities (Saskatchewan Investors
Protection) Amendment Act. I appreciated the minister’s opening comments,
her second reading speech outlining the provisions within the legislation, and
in particular emphasizing the importance of proper regulation of this industry
as well as protection of investors, something that we very much support and
endorse as well.
She
mentioned in her speech that the provisions laid out in this amendment Act come
from recommendations from stakeholders and the public more generally, Mr.
Speaker. I’m looking forward to the opportunity to delve into this piece of
legislation a little bit more and reaching out to stakeholders as well to get their
feedback.
I
know I also have several colleagues who are looking forward to enter into the
debate on this piece of legislation. In order to facilitate all of that good
work, I’m prepared now to move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 150.
The Speaker:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to
adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Speaker:
— Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Mr. McMorris that Bill No. 138 — The Workers’ Compensation (Extending
Firefighter Coverage) Amendment Act, 2023 be now read a second time.]
The Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Rosemont.
Mr. Wotherspoon:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s a pleasure to enter in today briefly with
respect to Bill No. 138, The
Workers’ Compensation (Extending Firefighter Coverage) Amendment Act, 2023,
Mr. Speaker.
I’ll
speak to a specific portion of this legislation. I know there’s some other
aspects within it that our Labour critic and our team is involved in
consultation and review to make sure that this is in the best interests of
firefighters across the province.
But
certainly with respect to the additional cancer coverages that are extended
through this legislation, this is good news and something that this opposition
and the professional firefighters and fire chiefs have pushed for and
paramedics have pushed for a very long period of time in this Assembly, Mr.
Speaker. So we’re very pleased to see this action on this front. We’ve pushed
for this coverage, Mr. Speaker.
And
I just want to commend the incredible leaders across Saskatchewan that serve
firefighters and paramedics in Saskatchewan. I want to give a special shout-out
to Lloyd Zwack, the president of the Saskatchewan Professional Firefighters,
for he and his organization’s relentless leadership on this front. And I want
to give a local shout-out to Local 181 president, Tyler Packham, president of
the Regina firefighters for his voice and his courage and leadership on this
front as well as sharing personal experiences courageously on this front, Mr.
Speaker.
When
we look at firefighters and paramedics, these are folks that serve and
sacrifice and put themselves at risk, Mr. Speaker. They’re responding to some
of the greatest challenges and tragedies within this province, Mr. Speaker.
They’re running into danger and providing care for all of us, Mr. Speaker.
They’re on a day-to-day basis seeing the horrors with respect to a broken
mental health and addiction system in the province, Mr. Speaker, and the
realities, the hard realities that so many families are suffering on this
front, Mr. Speaker. And of course they’re also putting themselves at risk of
cancer through their work, Mr. Speaker, in keeping us safe.
It’s
only the right thing to do when we know that this work puts these firefighters
and paramedics at risk in this way with respect to cancer, to then make sure
that that cancer is covered, to make sure that we have the backs of those that
have our backs day in, day out in communities across Saskatchewan. Whether that
be the professional firefighters, whether that be volunteer firefighters,
whether that be those fighting wildfires courageously, or those down on the
prairies, Mr. Speaker, these emergency responders deserve our commitment, Mr.
Speaker.
I’ve
been pleased to work with the firefighters on this front in this community to
push for this expansion, Mr. Speaker. I’ll remind government that there are
some other very important calls — and I won’t get into them all here today —
some very important other calls that the firefighters have made that would
improve public safety and that would improve supports for those that are doing
such important work for all of us, Mr. Speaker.
So
to all those that serve in emergency services — all those firefighters, all
those paramedics, of course, all those police, everyone else, Mr. Speaker — I
say thank you. I say thank you for what you do within this province.
This
legislation with respect to the expansion of cancer coverages is an important
step. It’s an important way to extend support for those that are putting their
lives at risk while they save ours, Mr. Speaker. With that being said, I will
move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 138, The Workers’ Compensation
(Extending Firefighter Coverage) Amendment Act. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The Deputy Speaker:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate on Bill No. 138. Is that agreed?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms.
Eyre that Bill No. 140 — The
Miscellaneous Statutes Repeal Act, 2023 be now read a second time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Coronation Park.
[14:45]
Mr. Burki:
— It’s my pleasure to stand on debate for Bill No. 140, The
Miscellaneous Statutes Repeal Act, 2023. A blast from the past to see an
Act passed before any of us were elected or even born. Good time to reflect on
issues that still resonate today: faith-based education struggling for funds;
wildlife, not much government commitment to conservation; and home ownership in
Saskatchewan, worst in the nation on mortgage defaults.
Mr.
Speaker, our critic on Bill 140, The Miscellaneous Statutes Repeal Act, 2023
will be talking in detail after consultation with the stakeholders. With that,
Mr. Speaker, I will adjourn the debate on Bill 140, The Miscellaneous
Statutes Repeal Act, 2023.
The Deputy Speaker: — The member has moved to adjourn debate on Bill
140. Is that agreed?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
The
Deputy Speaker: —
Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms.
Eyre that Bill No. 141 — The Statute Law Amendment Act, 2023
be now read a second time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Nutana.
Ms. Ritchie:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s a pleasure to be on my feet entering into debate
on Bill No. 141, The Statute Law Amendment Act, 2023. And my
pronouns are she/her.
So
this is a housekeeping kind of a bill focused on various Acts that will fix
some of the spelling, grammar, and cross-referencing mistakes. It replaces
references to “Her Majesty the Queen” with “the Crown” and changes any mention
of “his” or “her” to “their” so that it is gender-neutral. I think as has been
mentioned already, with the passing of Her Majesty this has been a good
opportunity to take the opportunity for more neutral references and updating
the language with the passing of the sovereign.
And
it just also happens to be Trans Awareness Week from November 13th to 19th. And
I thought it was sort of a good time maybe to touch on that a little bit with
the changes that are presented here in the amendment Act to be less gendered
and refer to their pronouns.
I
think that there’s been a lot of, you know, confusion in the past about what is
the difference between identity and expression. Certainly now is always a good
time to show allyship with the trans community. And I think that this bill is
pointing the way certainly in terms of how it is sort of normalizing the
sharing of pronouns and removal of that gendered language that we see here in
this bill. And I think there’s so much more we could be doing to further
greater understanding, greater allyship.
It
also talks about the need, as allies, to do our research, to listen to
transgender voices, understand the intersectionality of the issues that they
face, normalize sharing of pronouns as I’ve done here today and be mindful of
where that gendered language is showing up, and then finally, challenging
transphobic jokes.
So
I just wanted to take that opportunity to make mention of that, given the
content of this amendment Act and the fact that it is in fact Trans Awareness
Week. And I know that our critic will do their due diligence and ensure that
this is an Act that is keeping to those housekeeping amendments. And with that
I will move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 141.
The Deputy Speaker:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate on Bill No. 141. Is that agreed?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Mr.
Duncan that Bill No. 142 — The Miscellaneous Statutes (Utility Line Locates) Amendment Act, 2023
be now read a second time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Coronation Park.
Mr. Burki:
— Mr. Deputy Speaker, it is my pleasure and my honour to stand on the debate of
Bill 142, The
Miscellaneous Statutes (Utility Line Locates) Amendment Act, 2023. Mr. Speaker, we all know that safety is important
for private citizens and Crown employees as well. It’s very rare that we see
the government worry about that, consumers’ protection at the cost of making it
harder for the Crown to do their businesses. Government should have to be doing
a lot better.
Good to have consistency among all the Crowns,
avoiding any confusion. We love our Crowns, and that’s why we are so
disappointed that the Sask Party is running that into the ground. Our critic
for Bill 142 will debate in detail after consultation with the stakeholders.
With that, Mr. Speaker, I will adjourn the debate on Bill 142.
The Deputy
Speaker: — The member
has moved to adjourn debate on Bill No. 142. Is that agreed?
Some Hon.
Members: — Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried.
[The Assembly
resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Mr. Cockrill
that Bill No. 143 — The Child Care Amendment Act, 2023/Loi
modificative de 2023 sur les garderies d’enfants be now read a second
time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Walsh Acres.
Mr.
Clarke: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It’s a pleasure to rise to enter the debate on Bill 143, The Child Care
Amendment Act. You know, we come into this debate with the
reality that 92 per cent of young children in Saskatchewan live in a child care
desert. We saw that number come to us from the Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives earlier in 2023. So it is good to see an initiative that addresses
child care.
It
is disappointing to see, Mr. Speaker, that the government has only created 378
of their targeted 6,000 new spaces for child care across this province in year
one. I can’t do that math in my head real quick to what percentage that is, but
I would say it’s dismal, Mr. Speaker. So we do hope that the government will
put some energy and some funds into making sure that their next year’s targets
are reached in a much more robust way. Because this is important to working
families, Mr. Speaker.
We
hear this across the province. I definitely hear this in my constituency where
people don’t have access to child care, whether that is as a parent and not
being able to get their child into affordable child care . . . I know
a friend of mine who has a new baby, a one-year-old baby, looking to go back to
work and they are looking for child care. They are 1,900th on the waiting list,
Mr. Speaker — 1,900 people before them to get into this child care centre. It’s
unacceptable.
But
it’s also difficult for communities. And this is a rural Saskatchewan issue
where we see communities clamouring to try and create child care spaces in
their community. I know the village of Edenwold has been trying for years to
get a child care centre in their community. They’ve applied to get child care
spaces and continue to be put off, continue to be put off, continue to be put
off even though there is a distinct need for child care in that community, Mr.
Speaker. So we do need robust action on this child care front across the
province.
Ten-dollar-a-day
daycare is a fantastic step forward. The affordability of daycare when it isn’t
$10 a day is an incredible barrier for families. I know it was for my family
when my twins were born. To have two small children in child care at the same
time was cost prohibitive for us. And so instead of having both of us working
in the . . . be part of the economy, one of us was always staying
home to provide child care because alternatively, one of us would have just
been working just to pay child care. So commend the $10‑a-day initiative.
It is a real affordability piece for people across this province, for young
families across this province. So that’s great to see.
But
I just want to highlight, before I cede the floor, you know, we’ve heard from a
number of child care providers here in this Assembly. They’ve come into the
gallery, a couple of them a number of times, to speak about the issues and
struggles that they’re having. So I’d like to just highlight, you know, Nichole
Kessel was here. She’s the director of Wiggles and Giggles in Whitewood, and
they’ve . . . Nichole has come to the legislature twice now. And her
child care centre is now closed because it hasn’t been able to adjust to the
government’s changes and how they have rolled out the $10‑a-day child
care.
We
have Antonietta Harris, who came to the legislature as well and said, I need a
timeline so I can plan my business. This is a Regina daycare owner, Mr.
Speaker.
And
so there are serious issues here with how this is being rolled out. I hope that
the government will take this on in a serious and thoughtful way because that
hasn’t seemed to be the way they’ve done it up till this point. But I hope for
Saskatchewan families, for young Saskatchewan families, that the government
does do this better than they have. So with that, Mr. Speaker, I will move to adjourn
debate on Bill 143. Thank you.
The Deputy Speaker:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate on Bill No. 143. Is that agreed?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Mr.
Merriman that Bill No. 144 — The
Police (Miscellaneous) Amendment Act, 2023 be now read a second time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Nutana. Or excuse me, Saskatoon Nutana. Saskatoon,
yeah.
Ms. Ritchie:
— That was close enough. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Just for the record,
the member for Saskatoon Nutana, pronouns she/her.
It
is my pleasure to rise into debate on Bill No. 144, The Police
(Miscellaneous) Amendment Act, 2023. Well you know, this marshal service
has received considerable debate in the Assembly leading up to this next phase
in its development, where this Act is laying out the duties of the head of the
service, who will be called the chief marshal, and makes important provisions
in place that do raise some questions, those being that the serious incident
response team head can waive or block the Public Complaints Commission sharing
and copying of complaints if it’s under a SIRT [serious incident response team]
investigation, that the head can’t share investigation files that are under
consideration of the Auditor General. And if the Auditor General is considering
a report, that SIRT’s usual three-month deadline, the published summary, starts
from the day the Auditor General, its consideration has concluded.
So
these kinds of provisions do raise some questions, I would say. But I suppose
above and beyond that, you know, we’re not really seeing a clear and compelling
reason why we need this marshal service at all. And when we see these kinds of
provisions, it does also point to those greater concerns around transparency
and accountability regarding issues that come forward to the Public Complaints
Commission.
[15:00]
Certainly
we’ve seen other cases where police members have come under investigation and
the need for separation when those reviews occur, and that there is both clear
objectivity and perception of not just, you know, the structural but also the
perceived objectivity as well. And I think that we’re seeing, with this
legislation, concerns around how that objectivity will be maintained and how,
when complaints come forward, that they won’t be under undue influence.
And
I mean, certainly we only have to look to what happened in Alberta where the
Premier there was meddling in police affairs in a very concerning manner. And
so certainly, I mean, that is where our concerns rest here in terms of, how
will a police marshals service be able to ensure that separation is maintained?
That there isn’t undue influence, and that there is proper separation between
the work of this police force and the ministry to which it reports?
But
I guess I feel like I’ve kind of gotten down into the nitty-gritty of this
without sort of stepping back and just mentioning also that there still remains
to this day, after all of the inquiry, all the questioning that has occurred to
this point as to there being a legitimate need for this service or a gap that
it’s filling. What we’re seeing here is another layer of policing that will
continue to see existing police services continue to go unfunded and
unsupported. It is a marshals service that came forward without consultation of
those said police forces or the experts who work in community safety and crime
reduction.
It
seems as though this government simply felt that they needed to come in with a
heavy hammer as a way to demonstrate to the public that they were taking a concerted
action, when in fact what we’re going to see here is a misuse of government
funds to fund another layer with added bureaucracy and create the opportunity
for gaps and the lack of coordination between services.
And
at the end of the day, will that really result in crime reduction and safer
communities for Saskatchewan people? We’ve been very clear on this side of the
House that we don’t, do not, support the marshals service, that we would like
to see funding increased for our existing police services, and more money put
into the root causes of crime — whether that be for mental health and
addictions, evidence-based harm reduction that this government across the way
continues to ignore and evade while at the same time continuing to raise taxes
and fees, utility rates, and starve our Crowns.
So
yet again, we see just another glaring example of a government that is
mismanaging funds and not providing evidence-based solutions to addressing real
issues that are facing Saskatchewan people.
I’ll
also say finally that we did see a resolution that came forward at the SARM [Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities]
convention last week also calling for the scrapping of this unnecessary and
unproven service, because it is not cost-effective. Money could be better spent
where . . . We have the contribution from federal dollars into our
RCMP [Royal Canadian
Mounted Police] services. This marshal
police service is going to have to be funded 100 per cent by the
1.2 million ratepayers here in Saskatchewan. And so it’s a gross misuse of
public funds that will have no measurable benefit to the people of the
province.
I
know that our critic for this area will have far more to say on this very
important matter as the bill goes forward. So with that I will move to adjourn
debate on Bill No. 144.
The Deputy Speaker:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate on Bill 144. Is that agreed?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms. Eyre that Bill No. 145 — The Funeral and Cremation Services (Legal
Decision-Maker Protection) Amendment Act, 2023 be now read a second
time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the Opposition House Leader.
Ms. Sarauer:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s my honour to rise today and enter into the
debate on Bill No. 145, The Funeral and Cremation Services (Legal
Decision-Maker Protection) Amendment Act. Now, Mr. Speaker, this bill rights
what was a wrong in the legislation, and the Minister of Justice outlined that
very well in her second reading speech, where the provision around authorized
decision makers didn’t account for situations where parents . . . The
reality of many families today frankly, unfortunately parents are no longer
together. They’re not deciding together. They’re not in agreement of what will
happen to their child’s remains. The legislation as it currently stands reverts
to the oldest parent, Mr. Speaker.
About
a year ago a woman came to my colleague’s office, the member for Regina
University, and my colleague invited me to a meeting with her. She’s a woman
whose 18‑year-old son died tragically in a car accident, Mr. Speaker, and
she learned about this provision in the legislation in what is the worst way
possible.
While
dealing with the horrific experience of the death of her 18‑year-old son,
she also had to deal with her ex-partner who . . . There was a
history, as she told us, of abuse in that relationship. They had been separated
for quite a long time and hadn’t really been communicating much up until the
point of the death of their son. In fact there was a restraining order at one
point between the two of them. The son had been living at her house for a while,
had recently moved out. In fact all of his . . . his mailing address,
his driver’s licence was still all pointing to her house, the mother’s house.
Upon
the death of her son, though, when it came to the point of deciding on the
funeral service, what was going to happen with her son’s body, the funeral
director made it very clear and her ex made it very clear that it was actually
his decision to make, not hers, for the simple reason that he was older than
her, because that’s what the legislation provided. It was an absolutely
horrible story that she took to our office.
And
we wrote a letter to the Minister of Justice outlining this issue and its
provision in the legislation and how outdated it is. And much to the credit of
the Minister of Justice, she wrote back right away and agreed and said that her
office would look into this.
And
my heartfelt thanks goes to the Minister of Justice for taking that letter and
taking this concern and coming forward with this legislation today. It needed
to happen. I’m very happy to see it happen. We’re all very happy to see it
happen, because nobody should have to go through what that woman went through
who came to my colleague’s office that day.
I
don’t think I have much more I want to say about this legislation right now,
but I am looking forward to, at a later stage, having the opportunity to speak
about this with officials at committee. I did want to take the time to thank
the minister for her office’s and her work on this; was very happy to see this
come forward.
There
are times when we’re able to work together to push forward positive change for
the people of Saskatchewan, and we don’t highlight those times often enough.
And this is one I think that should be highlighted, Mr. Speaker, so I wanted to
take the opportunity in this adjourned debate to do that. So at this point in
time I am prepared now to move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 145.
The Deputy Speaker:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate on Bill No. 145. Is that agreed?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms.
Eyre that Bill No. 146 — The King’s Bench
Consequential Amendments Act, 2023 be now read a second time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Coronation Park.
Mr. Burki:
— Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It’s my honour and pleasure to stand and
debate on Bill 146, The King’s Bench Consequential Amendments Act, 2023.
Well
with the passage of time a lot of change is coming, and it’s great that we are
changing our amendment accordingly as well. These updates keep on coming. A
good reminder how . . . [inaudible] . . . into a legal
court with Her Majesty was for so long. Looking into what’s likely to be a
century of kings, I wonder how our relationship to the law and the Crown will
change with the time.
Mr.
Deputy Speaker, our critic on Bill 146 will debate in detail after doing some
research and will get back to you, and we’ll get back to the debate. With that,
Mr. Speaker, I will adjourn debate on Bill 146.
The Deputy Speaker:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate on Bill No. 146. Is that agreed?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms.
Eyre that Bill No. 148 — The
Film Content Information Act be now read a second time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Nutana.
Ms. Ritchie:
— Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I appreciate that recognition. It’s a pleasure
again to be on my feet a final time this afternoon weighing in on Bill
No. 148, The Film Content Information Act.
Yeah,
actually I would say those were kind of tough years. For those of us that
remember them, you know, there was a lot of inflation and high interest rates
and the like at that time and it was difficult economic times for sure. And
government on the opposite side certainly didn’t improve things by any stretch,
that’s for sure. That’s for sure.
But
I don’t want to get distracted by the heckling coming from across the way. I
wanted to talk about this Bill No. 148, The Film Content Information
Act and the evolution since the ’80s and, you know, and up until now where
we have sort of livestreaming, the ability to download content off the
internet, and you know, all the issues around regulating pornography and adult
content and the like.
And
so I know that this bill is really focused on the classification of films and
the identification of, you know, the content warnings, whether those are for
language or substance use, smoking, sex. Those are some of the typical ones you
sort of see when you’re looking at, you know, reviewing the classifications for
movies here now.
And
it’s my understanding that this bill came about because of, you know, calls
from the film industry around the administrative burden, the cost burden, that
they experience in classifying movies across the country and every province.
And one of the main features of this bill is the removal of that classification
fee of $440 while also providing that content classification.
[15:15]
I
did find it interesting that, you know, there was mention made by the minister
that the legislation will still require that adult films be reviewed and
approved by an entity authorized to approve adult films. It does raise some
questions in my mind about how that authorized entity is . . . the
rules around that entity, how it receives the guidance and direction for
reviewing those films. I’m not really even sure at this point if that is, you
know, within the scope of this legislation or if it has just been carried
forward from the previous film and video classification Act of 2016. But
certainly that, I think, will be an important thing to be reviewing as this
bill goes forward.
It’s
also, you know, so interesting that we’ve had a government here be responsive
to, you know, theatre owners and filmmakers from outside the province when we
saw so little regard when they cut the film tax credit however many years ago
and how that literally gutted the industry and sent that class of workers and
professionals to have to leave the province. And you know, it had a really
negative effect on our bottom line.
And
so while of course we always applaud modernization of legislation to keep up
with the state of our economy and moving technology, these kinds of forces
always require us to update our legislation.
You
know, sometimes the devil can be in the details, so I know that the critic will
be taking a very close look to ensure that the changes that are proposed in
this legislation aren’t having any unintended consequences that, you know, that
the intent is maintained. And I’ll leave it to them to do that good work.
So
with that I will conclude and move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 148, The
Film Content Information Act.
The Deputy Speaker:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate on Bill 148. Is that agreed?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Ms.
Eyre that Bill No. 149 — The
Franchise Disclosure Act be
now read a second time.]
The Deputy Speaker:
— I recognize the member from Regina Walsh Acres.
Mr.
Clarke: — Thank you, Mr. Deputy
Speaker. It’s a pleasure to enter into debate on Bill No. 149, The
Franchise Disclosure Act.
Good
to see this legislation coming into effect, as we are the only Western province
to not have a similar legislation, hopefully there to protect, you know,
franchisees as they endeavour to explore business opportunities in
Saskatchewan. We, of course, on this side of the House and I know on the other
side too, but we definitely value the small-business community across the
province. It is the backbone to the Saskatchewan economy and so whenever we can
make sure that we are putting in legislation and protections to protect
entrepreneurs in Saskatchewan, I think that’s a good thing.
We
do have some questions around what kind of substantial protections are there
for franchisees from say, hard-to-detect undisclosed irregularities in a
franchise, so I think some questions still there. What are the options to
rescind franchise agreements? Are they sufficient in protecting franchisees?
So
we will continue to engage with stakeholders across the province, looking into
this Act to make sure it does fulfill the need that franchisees are hoping for
across the province and make sure that it matches what other protections are there
in other provinces.
So
with that, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I will move to adjourn debate on Bill 149.
The Deputy Speaker: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate on Bill 149.
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried. I recognize the Minister of Corrections, Policing and Public Safety.
Hon. Mr. Merriman:
— Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I move that this House do now
adjourn.
The Deputy Speaker:
— This House stands adjourned until tomorrow, Thursday, November 16th, 2023 at
. . . Oh, sorry. Is the motion to adjourn accepted?
Some Hon. Members:
—
Agreed.
The Deputy Speaker:
— Carried. Okay, this House stands adjourned until Thursday, November 16th,
2023 at 10:00.
[The
Assembly adjourned at 15:21.]
Disclaimer:
The electronic versions of the Legislative Assembly's documents are provided
for information purposes only. The content of the documents is identical to the
printed record; only the presentation differs unless otherwise noted. The
printed versions are the official record for legal purposes.