CONTENTS
Mois de la Francophonie Month of La Francophonie
Harbour Landing Village Holds Fifth Annual Country Jamboree
Think Indigenous International Education Conference
Hit TV Series Shows that Representation Matters
University of Saskatchewan Huskies Dominate the National
Scene
Industry Partner Receives Approval to Build Uranium Mine
Child Care Agreement with Federal Government
Addressing Intimate Partner Violence
Community Safety and Library Worker Concerns
Status of Women in Saskatchewan
Government of Saskatchewan Introduces the Patients-First
Health Care Plan
Second Reading of Bill No. 612
MESSAGE FROM HIS MAJESTY KING CHARLES III

SECOND
SESSION — THIRTIETH LEGISLATURE
of
the
Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan
DEBATES
AND PROCEEDINGS
(HANSARD)
N.S.
Vol. 67 No. 30A
Monday, March 9, 2026, 13:30
[Prayers]
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
Government House Whip.
Brad Crassweller: — Thank
you, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you, it’s my distinct honour and privilege
to introduce to you a number of guests seated in the west gallery. And today we
have a number of students from Edenwold Elementary School. We have 15 students
from kindergarten to grade 3, and we also have 14 grade 4 to grade 6 students.
And so we want to welcome them to their Legislative Assembly.
They’re
also accompanied today by their teachers, Laurie Colhoun, Ang Cockle, Mackenzie
Stamm, Michael Dumais, Robin Mathewson, and of course the bus driver, Rod
Beckett. We greatly appreciate all of you for coming here today.
We
had a great time. We had some ice cream. Just got to make sure — yeah, we
talked about that — make sure we keep the member from Lumsden-Morse happy. But
we enjoyed some ice cream and some great questions. And I just ask all members
to help me welcoming these young people to their Legislative Assembly from
Edenwold Elementary.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Nathaniel Teed: — Thank
you very much, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you and to all members, it’s my
honour to introduce a number of SEIU-West [Service Employees International
Union-West] members in your gallery today.
I’m
pleased to welcome Jason Monteith, the vice-president of SEIU-West. He is
joined by Angie Kells, who is a digital organizer with SEIU-West. And they’re
also joined by Angela Caragata, who works as a CCA [continuing care assistant],
and as well, the unit Chair at Pioneer Lodge where she works. And I’ve been
told this is Angela’s first time in the Legislative Assembly, so we invited her
to see the proceedings, but SEIU-West members and their leadership are no
strangers to this Assembly.
Of
course we were able to sit down, myself and the shadow minister of Finance,
ahead of the budget, as we all know that health care workers have gone nearly
four years without a raise, in some cases three years without collective
bargaining agreements. So we had a really good conversation about the needs of
their workers ahead of the federal budget . . . or sorry, our
provincial budget, Mr. Speaker. I’m thinking on another level.
But
you know that SEIU-West represents health care workers, education workers, CBO
[community-based organizations] workers, so many workers in this province. They
do such a fantastic job. I’d like to ask all members to help me welcome them to
their Legislative Assembly.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
Minister of Advanced Education.
Hon. Ken Cheveldayoff: — Thank
you very much, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to join with the member opposite in
welcoming the members from SEIU-West to their Legislative Assembly. It’s always
a pleasure to have them in the legislature.
I
had a chance to meet with Lisa Zunti and others shortly after my appointment as
Minister of Labour, and also an opportunity to welcome any members when we did
the opening of the new entrance at St. Paul’s Hospital. They represent many
health care workers around the province, and I want to thank them for the work
that they do and look forward to working with them. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Regina Mount Royal.
Trent Wotherspoon: — Thank
you, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you, I want to introduce some honoured
guests that are with us here today on the floor of the legislature, seated in
your gallery, and as well seated in the west gallery here today. These are hon.
members who served this Assembly and their communities and worked to make this
province a better place. And each had really awesome contributions to their
communities and to this province.
I’ll
start up in the west gallery. I want to welcome Alex Taylor, who served as an
MLA [Member of the Legislative Assembly], who’s clergy as well, was born in
Glasgow, Scotland. A real awesome guy. He’s here today, they’re all here today
for the CPA [Commonwealth Parliamentary Association] gathering that’s here
today. He was elected in Kindersley, Mr. Speaker.
Seated
beside him, or just over from him, is Ron Wormsbecker from Weyburn, a lawyer
and a leader and the MLA from Weyburn. And it’s a pleasure to have him here as
well.
Seated
in your gallery is no stranger to this Assembly. He used to be seated in your
Chair, Mr. Speaker, served as the Speaker of this Assembly and served as the
MLA for Biggar for many years in a real honourable way as well. And continues
to give back to democracy and to this province in meaningful ways as well, Mr.
Speaker.
And
seated behind me are two real awesome guys, one that I got to serve with for
quite a few years. They call him the Velvet Revolver. This guy had a heart of
gold. He was tough as nails; a lot of people didn’t always see that. But David
Forbes served as an MLA. He was a minister. He’s a bird lover. He’s a nature
guy. He was a teacher. It’s real nice to have you here, David, on the floor of
your Assembly.
And
then there’s a hockey player who is seated beside him by the name of Maynard
Sonntag. A young guy, comes by way of Meadow Lake. Served as an MLA and a
minister, of course. He had worked through the credit union movement. He had
worked, after his service in here as an MLA and a minister, leading a housing
co‑operative corporation within the community, and as a realtor as well.
And he’s still looking like he’s in fighting form. He just got off the ice this
morning, Mr. Speaker. He was over at the Co-operators this morning playing some
hockey. It’s a pleasure to have you here as well, Maynard.
I
ask all members to join with me in welcoming these individuals, these leaders
to our province and to their respective communities, back to their legislature.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
Minister of CIC [Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan].
Hon. Jeremy Harrison: — Well
thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I want to join with my friend opposite in
welcoming all of the former members here to the Assembly today. I know CPA is
on, and I want to welcome all of them.
I
want to specifically welcome though, two who were the last two introduced by
that member, but two members who really did live out the title of hon. members.
And
I got to serve with David Forbes for a number of years across the floor. David
popularized the phrase “cold comfort,” I would note for the record. Used that
like no one else. But also David had served on the Board of Internal Economy
for many, many years and had been the opposition caucus Chair. And we worked
together on many, many different things. So welcome to David.
And
I want to really sincerely welcome Maynard Sonntag to the Assembly as well, a
gentleman who did diligent and integrity service for the people of Meadow Lake
for many, many years. We’ve actually only had three MLAs for Meadow Lake in
about the last 50 years, if you can believe that, and I think Maynard and I
take up about 40 of those years.
So
I want to really sincerely welcome Maynard. We’ve become friends over the
years. And I just say thanks for your service, Maynard, and thanks, David, for
your service as well.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Regina South Albert.
Aleana Young: — Thank
you very much, Mr. Speaker. It’s my pleasure to rise today and, to and through
you, welcome to this Assembly Michael Stevenson, a fourth-year student of
economics at the U of R [University of Regina], also currently
serving as the president of RWDSU [Retail, Wholesale and Department Store
Union] 539 representing Sherwood Co‑op employees.
I’ve
gotten to know Michael over the past couple years through his keen interest in
politics. He’s helped me out an astonishing amount through volunteering at my
annual fundraisers and occasionally has hit the doors with me in the great
state of Regina South Albert to talk to some of the best constituents in the
province of Saskatchewan.
Michael
is, as I said, a student at the U of R. When he’s not, you know, up
to his eyeballs in homework in his fourth year, he’s an avid basketball player,
routinely practising at his local YWCA. And he’s just one of those wonderful
young people, Mr. Speaker, with a deep interest in what happens in and outside
of this place and believes fundamentally in the difference that politics can
make in improving this province and the lives of those who live here.
So
with that, Mr. Speaker, I’d ask all members to join me in welcoming Michael to
this, his legislature, for his first question period.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
Minister of Community Safety.
Hon. Michael Weger: — Thank
you, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you, Mr. Speaker, I’d also like to rise
and just welcome Ron Wormsbecker back to the Legislative Assembly.
Mr.
Speaker, Ron Wormsbecker, not only a resident of Weyburn, but he was also my
principal when I was a young articling student at what was then Nimegeers,
Schuck, Wormsbecker & Bobbitt law firm. And so Mr. Wormsbecker passed on a
lot of knowledge to me over the years, and I’m so grateful for the relationship
we’ve had and everything he taught me. And I just thank you, Ron, and welcome
you back to your Legislative Assembly.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Regina Walsh Acres.
Jared Clarke: — Thank
you, Mr. Speaker. I’m honoured to be on my feet today to join with the member
from White City-Qu’Appelle in welcoming the group from Edenwold School.
But
I want to say a special shout-out to Ms. Mackenzie Stamm for all of the work
that she puts into her job every single day. She is someone who has played a
huge part in my family’s story as a teacher at Edenwold School. And I know she
just puts everything into it. It’s a small school. Two classrooms in this
school: typically a kindergarten to grade 2 or grade 3, and then a grade 4 to 6
classroom.
And
so to the rest of the staff, thank you for what you do on a day-to-day basis.
It is not an easy task, running a school of that size with so few staff. You
are asked to do a lot of things and make a lot of things work for those
students, and I know the great job that goes on in that school. But I just
wanted to say thanks to Ms. Stamm for all she’s done for my family.
So
with that, I’d ask all members to join me in welcoming Ms. Stamm to her
Legislative Assembly.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
Leader of the Opposition.
Carla Beck: — Thank
you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to join with the members who have spoken already in
welcoming all of the guests that have joined us here today, especially the
former legislators who have joined us: former Speaker Weekes; both Alex and
Ruth Taylor, who’ve joined us in the east gallery. Former MLA Ron Wormsbecker,
wonderful to see you here, as well as Maynard Sonntag and former colleague
David Forbes. It’s really delightful to get the chance to see you here today.
I’m
also going to briefly introduce a couple of folks who have surprised me here in
your gallery, Mr. Speaker. No strangers, but I’m going to give them a brief
introduction: my mom, Judy; and my oldest daughter, Hannah, who’ve joined us
here today. I wasn’t sure . . . I thought last I heard Mom might be
stuck in Carnduff last night. They had a southern final, the U15 C south final,
that went to game 3 and was closed by a heck of a slapshot from almost centre
ice actually. So they braved the highways obviously and got back home.
And
my daughter Hannah, who we are thrilled has started her career here in Regina.
It’s great to have her at home and have her over for Sunday suppers, Mr.
Speaker.
I’ll
just note, I’m not sure what all is on Mom’s list these days, but she is
working towards the Lang 120th homecoming. I’m sure that they’re busy getting
the ball diamonds ready and all sorts of wonderful things like that. I invite
Ruth and Alex as well, who were our ministers in Lang, to check that event out,
Mr. Speaker. It’ll be a great time.
But
with that, Mr. Speaker, I’d like to join all of the members and welcome these
guests to this, their Legislative Assembly.
Speaker Goudy:
— And I would like to also comment on the past members that are here with us
today. We’re honoured to have you here. And you know, Commonwealth Day, it’s a
big deal and making a sacrifice to come back to spend some time with us. We’re
going to have the Lieutenant Governor come, and we’re going to have some time
discussing a lot of the history in this place. And I appreciate you taking the
time out of your busy schedules to come back and join with us.
You
know what it’s like to sit in these seats and the sacrifice that’s made by each
one of these members, so thank you for joining us today and celebrating
Commonwealth Day together with us. So welcome to your Legislative Assembly.
And
we’ll move on to presenting petitions.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Saskatoon Southeast.
Brittney Senger: — Thank
you, Mr. Speaker. I rise to present a petition calling for adequate and
equitable SAID [Saskatchewan assured income for disability] rates.
[13:45]
The
undersigned residents of the province of Saskatchewan wish to bring to your
attention the following: that current SAID rates mean that individuals who rely
on the program live in what is referred to as deep poverty, defined as less
than 75 per cent of the poverty line; that the Saskatchewan government engages
in clawback policies that have been found to be discriminatory and further
disadvantage people living with disabilities; that Saskatchewan people with
disabilities are struggling to make ends meet under historical inflationary
pressures.
I
shall read the prayer:
The undersigned residents
reside in Moose Jaw. I do so present.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the member
from Regina Douglas Park.
Nicole
Sarauer: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today to present a petition calling on the
government to reverse the ban on third-party educators from publicly funded
schools.
Those who’ve signed this
petition wish to bring to our attention the following: that on August 22nd,
2023 the Saskatchewan government banned all third-party educators from publicly
funded schools. Those educators included organizations like the Regina Sexual
Assault Centre, the North East Outreach and Support Services, Partners Family
Services, and the Prince Albert Sexual Assault Centre, along with many others.
The topics that these organizations teach include consent, healthy
relationships, and child sexual abuse prevention.
Mr. Speaker, with
Saskatchewan’s worst-in-the-nation rates in intimate partner violence and
sexual abuse, the government should be doing everything possible to reduce
these rates, including prevention education. And the decision to ban these
educators would make Saskatchewan’s rates of intimate partner violence, sexual
violence, and sexual abuse worse, not better.
I’d like to read the prayer:
We, in
the prayer that reads as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative
Assembly of Saskatchewan call on the Government of Saskatchewan to immediately
reverse its decision to ban third-party educators in Saskatchewan schools and
consult with experts in developing a comprehensive curriculum for all
Saskatchewan students.
Those who signed this
petition today come from Saskatoon. I do so present.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the member
from Regina Coronation Park.
Noor Burki: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We, the undersigned
residents of the province of Saskatchewan, wish to bring to your attention the
following: that Saskatchewan tenants are currently experiencing the
highest level of rent increases in the country; that rent in Saskatchewan has
risen by 4 per cent in the last year alone, far outpacing wage growth and
putting more pressure on families, seniors, students, and low-income residents;
that without rent control landlords can implement unchecked rent hikes, making
housing increasingly unaffordable and unstable; that with rent control
residents can budget more effectively, potentially putting them in a position
to save for a down payment on their first home; that other provinces such as
British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Prince Edward Island have already
implemented rent control measures to protect tenants and maintain housing
affordability.
We, in
the prayer that reads as follows, respectfully request the Legislative Assembly
of Saskatchewan to call on the Government of Saskatchewan to adopt fair and
effective rent control legislations that limit annual rent increases.
Mr. Speaker, the signatories
of this petition reside in Regina. I do so present.
Speaker Goudy:
— I recognize the member from Regina Northeast.
Jacqueline Roy: —
Monsieur le Président, en ce Mois de la Francophonie, il y a une prise de
conscience grandissante de l’importance de protéger et de renforcer notre belle
communauté fransaskoise.
Malgré que c’est un pas dans
la bonne direction, il reste énormément de travail à faire. Nous devons
sécuriser des fonds fédéraux destinés à la santé, à l’éducation, à la culture,
aux garderies, à la justice, au postsecondaire. Nous ne pouvons pas laisser des
millions et des millions de dollars du gouvernement fédéral sur la table alors
que des communautés peinent à accéder à des services de qualité en français.
Nos écoles francophones sont
devant les tribunaux encore une fois. Nos toits de nos écoles s’effondrent
littéralement. Nos enfants et nos familles méritent mieux.
Partout dans nos plus petites
villes et municipalités, les gens commencent à prendre la parole. Ils demandent
fièrement d’être reconnus. Et moi je dis, « bravo, continuez ». Nous
avons la responsabilité ici dans la Chambre de les écouter.
Au fond on sait très bien-là
que le Mois de la Francophonie ce n’est pas seulement pour célébrer; c’est un
appel à avancer. J’espère que mes collègues des deux côtés de la Chambre vont
faire passer la loi 607, et cela sans délai, s’ils comprennent l’ampleur de la
situation. Merci.
Although
this is a step in the right direction, there is an enormous amount of work
still to be done. We must secure federal funding for health, education,
culture, daycares, justice, post-secondary education. We cannot leave millions
and millions of federal government dollars on the table while communities are
struggling to access quality services in French.
Our
francophone schools are once again before the courts. Our schools’ roofs are
literally collapsing. Our children and our families deserve better.
Everywhere
in our smallest cities and municipalities people are starting to speak out.
They are proudly demanding to be recognized. And I say, “Bravo, keep going.” We
have the responsibility here in this Chamber to listen to them.
Deep
down we know very well that the Month of La Francophonie is not only for
celebrating; it is a call to move forward. I hope that my colleagues on both
sides of the Chamber will help pass Bill 607, and do so without delay, if they
understand the magnitude of the situation. Thank you.]
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from White
City-Qu’Appelle.
Brad
Crassweller: —
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honour the life and legacy of John Coflin, a
deeply respected member of Saskatchewan’s disability services community. John
passed away on January 20th, 2026 with his wife, Joanne, and daughter Caitlin
by his side.
John dedicated his career to
strengthening supports for persons with disabilities and to advancing
inclusive, person-centred services across our province. From his work with
Inclusion Saskatchewan and the Regina Association for Community Living to his
service on numerous committees, John was a strong advocate for people with
intellectual disabilities.
Mr. Speaker, in 2016 John
received the Community Award from Inclusion Regina and the Premier’s Award for
Excellence in the Public Service for his role on the Ministry of Social
Services’ self-directed funding committee. These prestigious and worthy honours
reflect John’s professionalism and his commitment to helping empower
individuals and families with greater choice, independence, and dignity.
Beyond his professional
accomplishments, John will be remembered for his kindness, his dedication, and
his unwavering belief in the potential of every person. His work has left a
meaningful legacy that continues to shape disability services in our province
to this day.
On behalf of this Assembly I
extend my sincere condolences to John’s entire family, especially his wife,
Joanne, and daughter Caitlin; his many friends and colleagues; all of those
whose lives he touched. His contributions will not be forgotten. Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina Pasqua.
Bhajan
Brar: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On August 27th I was honoured to be invited
to the fifth annual Harbour Landing Village Country Jamboree. This was a
fantastic event that brought together residents, families, and neighbours
across Harbour Landing.
For the country jamboree they
transformed the grounds around Harbour Landing Village into a country
fairground, inspired by events like Country Thunder and Canadian Western
Agribition. They had live music, barbeque, a petting zoo, horse-drawn carriage
rides, mechanical bull rides, and bouncy castles. There was certainly something
for everyone to enjoy.
Harbour Landing Village,
located in Regina Pasqua, is a senior living community with a child care
centre. What makes them stand out is their commitment to bringing people
together through their community events. In addition to the country jamboree
Harbour Landing Village also hosts an annual Cultural Mosaic Expo, which allows
residents to get to sample the many different cultures without having to leave
their homes.
I ask that all members of
this Legislative Assembly join me in congratulating CEO [chief executive
officer] Janson Anderson and the entire Harbour Landing Village team for a
successful country jamboree. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from
Moosomin-Montmartre.
Kevin
Weedmark: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Last week I had the privilege of attending the Think
Indigenous conference here in Regina. It was an inspiring event that brought
together more than 1,200 educators, leaders, and community members from across
North America to focus on advancing Indigenous education.
I was pleased to attend the
conference at the invitation of Chief Evan Taypotat of Kahkewistahaw First
Nation, which hosted the event. I want to thank Chief Taypotat, Dr. Chris
Scribe, and everyone involved in organizing the conference for their leadership
and for creating such an impactful gathering.
As Chief Taypotat put it in
his opening remarks, the future is built on what we choose to invest in today.
This gathering is an investment into our children, our youth, and future
generations, who will one day look back at what we did when we had the chance.
The event was also a
celebration of Indigenous culture, incorporating the northern plains jingle
dance championship. Events like this are important because they create space
for learning, dialogue, and for collaboration. By bringing people together from
across North America, the Think Indigenous conference helps people build
stronger relationships and encourages innovative approaches to education.
Mr. Speaker, I want to
congratulate Kahkewistahaw First Nation and all of the organizers for hosting
such a meaningful conference. Their leadership and vision are helping move
important conversations forward and making a positive difference for Indigenous
education in our province and across North America. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Saskatoon
Meewasin.
Nathaniel
Teed: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. In romance storytelling the first meeting
between two characters is often called the meet-cute. And recently the city of
Regina guest-starred as the location for one of the most talked-about
meet-cutes in pop culture in the hit Canadian TV series, Heated Rivalry.
In the opening scene,
fictional queer hockey players Ilya Rozanov and Shane Hollander meet for the
first time in Regina. It’s easy to imagine the moment unfolding outside the
Brandt Centre, a place synonymous with hockey and community.
What makes this story
resonate isn’t just the romance. It’s that being queer in sport is still
treated as exceptional rather than ordinary. For many 2SLGBTQ [two-spirit,
lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and/or questioning] athletes, the
hyper-masculinization of rinks and locker rooms means that they remain spaces
where silence feels safer than honesty, and where being out can still risk
contracts, endorsement deals, or personal safety. Shane and Ilya navigate those
realities through the TV series, unable to live fully as their authentic
selves.
I was proud to see
Saskatchewan woven into this very Canadian story. The response to Heated
Rivalry shows how deeply representation matters. But the show also reminds
us of still how far we have to go. As we embrace the craze, let’s do more than
celebrate fiction. Let’s confront the barriers that queer athletes still face
and commit to building sporting spaces where the next generation won’t need a
television script to imagine belonging. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Sask Rivers.
Barret
Kropf: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Congratulations to the University of Saskatchewan
Huskies. On Sunday the women’s track and field team sprinted themselves to the
second-place finish at the national championships in Manitoba. Anchored by the
4 x 200 metre relay, their team broke the national record with Hailee
Woodhouse, Emma Egert, Selena Keyowski, and Grace Igbiki. Other gold medal
national championship performances came from Nicole Ostertag in hurdles and
Olamide Olaloku in triple jump.
On Saturday the men’s hockey
team repeated as Canada West champions as they skated away with the hardware
against Mount Royal University in a sweep over their rivals in Calgary. Good
luck to them next week at nationals in Halifax.
And, Mr. Speaker, the Bronze
Baby is headed back to Saskatoon. For the second year in a row the U of S
[University of Saskatchewan] Huskies women’s basketball team has captured the
national championship. They did so on the back of an undefeated regular season.
And then on championship weekend they sealed the school’s fourth Bronze Baby by
defeating University of New Brunswick by a score of 77 to 68. Gage Grassick was
named First Canadian All Star, Head Coach Lisa Thomaidis was named Coach of the
Year, and Ella Murphy Wiebe was named MVP [most valuable player] of the
tournament.
Mr. Speaker, as we all know,
Saskatchewan has what the world needs, including world-class student athletes,
coaches, and staff who build cultures of excellence and championship teams that
dominate the national scene. Congratulations to the Huskies on a fantastic
season.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Lloydminster.
Colleen
Young: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s another great day in Saskatchewan. I am happy to
inform this Chamber that just last week one of our great industry partners,
NexGen Energy, has received approval from the Canadian Nuclear Safety
Commission to build the Rook I uranium mine.
This approval comes 14
business days after the final two-part commission hearing process, which was
concluded February 12th, 2026. The approval of this mine will fortify
Saskatchewan’s uranium production to provide the world with the ever-growing
demand for this essential critical mineral. We are encouraged to see the
federal government grant approval in a timely manner, but this is no surprise
to our government as we have been cultivating a regulatory environment in
Saskatchewan to allow projects like this to prosper.
Don’t just take our word for
it though. The Fraser Institute, in their most recent 2025 survey, ranked
Saskatchewan as the third most attractive region in the world for mining
investment attractiveness.
[14:00]
It is also important to note
that we are only half a point behind Ontario, in second place. With this
announcement it will bring community investment, strong jobs, and further
royalties to the people of Saskatchewan. These royalties will fund our schools,
hospitals, and infrastructure.
Saskatchewan does have the
food, fuel, and fertilizer the world needs. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the Leader of
the Opposition.
Carla
Beck: —
Six times, Mr. Speaker, six times last week we asked the Premier’s SaskPower
minister about the $136 million rate hike that’s hitting Saskatchewan
families and farms and small businesses. Specifically we asked when he knew
that that rate hike was coming. Well, Mr. Speaker, he ducked and he dodged and
he weaved, but we didn’t get an answer.
So maybe today we can get a
straight answer from the Premier. On what day did the Premier decide to impose
his rate hike on the farms, families, and small businesses in Saskatchewan?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Premier.
Hon.
Scott Moe: —
Mr. Speaker, in this province we take the costs of our utilities very
seriously. And that’s why, through our SaskPower, SaskEnergy, SGI [Saskatchewan
Government Insurance] as well as SaskTel, we have, I believe it’s the
second-lowest utility bundle across the nation of Canada, Mr. Speaker.
Good work certainly by all of
the employees of each of those Crown corporations, Mr. Speaker. And I would say
some reasonable policy work as well by the heads of those agencies as well as
the Government of Saskatchewan to keep those prices low, to keep the utilities
rate in this province affordable, Mr. Speaker.
And I would point out, one of
the points that ensures the affordability of our utilities, in particular that
of SaskPower, moving forward: today Saskatchewan is the only carbon tax-free
area in the nation of Canada.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Carla
Beck: —
I’m just going to recap the timeline, and maybe people can see why I’m a bit
cynical. The SaskPower board met in November of 2025. The Premier stood in this
very Chamber in December, and he denied that any rate hike was even being
considered. But then in January — surprise, surprise — the rate hike was
announced. And by February, well that rate hike had already been applied to
SaskPower bills for families, for farms, and for small businesses in this
province.
Mr. Speaker, people simply
can’t afford this. And the Premier won’t say why or when he knew that this rate
hike was coming.
It’s a simple question, Mr.
Speaker. Why won’t the Premier answer?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Premier.
Hon.
Scott Moe: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I don’t know the dates that were cited
exactly, Mr. Speaker, but I trust that the Leader of the Opposition is correct
in all of the dates that she mentioned.
However at the point of
affordability of our utilities in this province, Mr. Speaker, we in
Saskatchewan — whether it be the utilities that we have, or the cost of living
that we have as families across this province, or businesses and industries
that are operating and employing here — we are very much feeling the
inflationary pressures, Mr. Speaker, like we are seeing across Canada and many
other areas of the world.
That’s why we are working
hard, Mr. Speaker, to keep the utility rates low in this province, working hard
to deliver on our campaign commitments to ensure that Saskatchewan remains the
most affordable place in the nation to live. That’s the commitment we made in
the last election. That’s a commitment that we take very seriously and one that
I would say that the Finance minister most certainly delivered on in last
year’s budget. And I think you will have more to see here in just a couple of
weeks in this year’s budget, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Carla
Beck: —
A $136 million hike to power bills isn’t helping. And people in this
province simply can’t afford more Sask Party tax hikes, rate hikes, and fee
hikes. And further evidence to this is found in the latest MNP consumer debt
index. Mr. Speaker, Saskatchewan has the highest rate of people who are behind
on their mortgage payments. We have the highest number of people who are in
mortgage arrears.
Does the Premier understand
that while Saskatchewan people are working harder and harder, they’re falling
further and further behind because of his failure to make life more affordable
in this province?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Premier.
Hon.
Scott Moe: —
Mr. Speaker, admittedly I just said that here in Saskatchewan families are
feeling the inflationary pressures like families across Canada are. However the
fact is that Saskatchewan does remain the most affordable province in the
nation of Canada, Mr. Speaker. That is a fact, Mr. Speaker, whether it’s the
rental rates, whether it’s the utility costs that we have, or the general cost
of living.
What is somewhat different in
Saskatchewan, Mr. Speaker, in a world that is very, very uncertain at the
moment globally is, you see Saskatchewan industries taking advantage of that
uncertainty and developing the natural resources, developing the ag ingredient
products that we have, and making them available to the world, Mr. Speaker.
Most recently I was in a
couple of countries around the world, Mr. Speaker, and I can say this: very
much do people want to do business not only with Canada, but they want to do
business in Saskatchewan. That’s why we’re seeing investment come into this province.
That’s why we’re seeing careers and jobs created from corner to corner in this
province, Mr. Speaker.
All the while the government
is going to continue to protect the ability that we have to remain the most
affordable province in the nation of Canada. All the while making those
investments, protecting our health care system, protecting the very communities
where we live. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Leader of the Opposition.
Carla
Beck: —
Well, Mr. Speaker, on one hand the Premier stands up and he says he understands
how hard it is for people. The very next question he stands up and tells people
in this province how good they’ve got it. And all the while they refuse to lift
a finger to offer relief to people in this province.
Mr. Speaker, in this province
we also have the highest number of people who are worried about their ability
to repay their debt. Still he piles on taxes and rate hikes. Food prices have
gone through the roof. Still he adds tax to groceries. And rent in this
province has risen for 43 straight months, Mr. Speaker — 49 per cent increase
since that Premier has been in office, since he first took that office. Still
they refuse to bring in rent control, and they refuse to do anything to keep
those corporate landlords from buying up properties and jacking up rents in
this province.
When will this Premier wake
up to the reality that people in this province are facing and start to make
life more affordable?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Premier.
Hon.
Scott Moe: —
Mr. Speaker, the most recent election was run largely on the affordability of
our communities across the province, Mr. Speaker, where this government had put
forward a suite of affordability measures, which added to the $2 billion
that we had in each and every budget. Now that number is two and a half billion
dollars a year in each and every budget for affordability measures to ensure
that Saskatchewan remains the most affordable place in Canada to live.
Where do you think those
affordability measures would be, Mr. Speaker, if we had included the $3 billion
that was unaccounted in the NDP [New Democratic Party] platform in that very
election, Mr. Speaker? Or added to that, the $1.1 billion that they’ve
asked for since that election, Mr. Speaker?
Mr. Speaker, time and time
again we see the NDP saying one thing and a month later saying something else.
And that’s precisely why, Mr. Speaker, nobody in this province takes the NDP
opposition seriously.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara
Conway: —
Ah yes, the most affordable in Canada. I want the Premier to tell the one in
three Saskatchewan kids under six living in poverty that, because something
doesn’t add up, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, the last time
this Sask Party government announced a so-called patient-first health plan was
in 2012 — 2009 actually, but they updated it in 2012. And at that time they
promised all people will have access “to a specialist and diagnostics within a
week.” They promised that everyone would have access to a family doctor and
access to surgery within three months, Mr. Speaker. And my favourite, they
promised that people won’t wait in emergency rooms.
Now 13 years later, Mr.
Speaker, if you need a mammogram, you have to go to Alberta, and the number of
doctors in this province is actually dropping.
Why didn’t this government
keep its 2012 health care promises to the people of Saskatchewan? And why
should people believe that this time it’s going to be any different?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon.
Jeremy Cockrill: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This government has a track record of improving health
care, Mr. Speaker, right across the province, whether that be the surgical
initiative many years ago to bring down surgical wait-lists . . .
Speaker
Goudy: — Sorry . . . Why
do I say sorry? I’m sorry for saying sorry. But enough breaking the rules.
Like, let’s hear the questions; let’s hear the answers.
Minister.
Hon.
Jeremy Cockrill: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I know I was missed last week and people are happy to
see me back. But, Mr. Speaker, we’re excited today to talk about the
patients-first plan that the Premier and I and several colleagues released this
morning in Saskatoon, Mr. Speaker.
This should be taken
seriously because this is feedback coming directly from patients, Mr. Speaker.
Ensuring a larger role for nurse practitioners in our system. Ensuring that
everybody has access to a primary care provider. Expanding virtual care
options, Mr. Speaker, something that that member opposite actually introduced a
motion last year to ban virtual care in Saskatchewan.
Mr. Speaker, that side talks
about ideas. This side actually comes up with ideas and executes.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara
Conway: —
Well, Mr. Speaker, I’ll have more to say about that later. Interesting words
from the Premier’s Health minister. This morning he also said, “I want to say
this very clearly to families and patients: we’ve heard you, and standing still
is no longer an option.”
Mr. Speaker, right now people
are being treated in hallways, in waiting rooms, beside registration desks.
Rural emergency rooms are closing without warning. Urgent care centres are
struggling to maintain bank hours. And fewer and fewer people in Saskatchewan
have access to primary care.
How long would the Premier’s
Health minister say exactly we’ve been standing still?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon.
Jeremy Cockrill: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. You know, we’ve been hearing from that side and those
members opposite about big, bold change coming, Mr. Speaker. But then change
comes, and they don’t like it because it’s not their idea.
But yet, Mr. Speaker, what’s
in the patients-first plan released today, Mr. Speaker, this is directly from
providers. This is directly from patients.
I’ll take nurse practitioners
again, for example, Mr. Speaker. We haven’t been standing still on that
subject, Mr. Speaker. We’ve introduced the independent contract model to
increase primary care access right across the province. What this plan does, Mr.
Speaker, is accelerate that change, expand that opportunity for NPs [nurse
practitioner] to hire additional allied professions, taking the limit off
contracts, Mr. Speaker, and as well as providing a financial incentive to
encourage more registered nurses to become nurse practitioners.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara
Conway: —
Mr. Speaker, the Premier said “we’re
listening” about 20 times in this morning’s press conference, but saying it
doesn’t make it true.
Let’s keep going on this
morning’s announcement. The Premier called it “the start of a conversation.”
His own words. He’s been Premier for eight years. They’ve been in charge of
health care for 18 years, Mr. Speaker.
The minister is standing
still. The Premier now wants to start a conversation. What exactly have these
guys been doing for these 8 and 18 years while health care collapses around
them?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon.
Jeremy Cockrill: —
Again, Mr. Speaker, we hear from the members opposite about this big, bold
change coming. And then change comes that’s bold, Mr. Speaker, and they don’t
like it. We have motions from members opposite to ban virtual care. Yet, Mr.
Speaker, when we leave this building and actually talk to real Saskatchewan
residents, they want more access to virtual care.
That is what is in the
patients-first health care plan, Mr. Speaker. We are going to be rolling out
virtual care to unattached patients, Mr. Speaker, very soon. We look forward to
that because that’s exactly what Saskatchewan patients are asking for. And that
is what we’re going to deliver on.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Saskatoon
Eastview.
Matt
Love: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We’re joined here again today by child care operators,
and they’re here today to call on this minister to fix the mess that he has
created. This minister has failed to deliver the child care deal that he
promised. Now parents are being hit with higher and unexpected fees, ranging in
increase anywhere from $10 a day to 30 to $85 a day of an increase. In response
the minister shrugged his shoulders and said, this is what we were able to get.
Why did the minister break
his promise to parents and to the child care providers who are here in the
Assembly today?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of Education.
Hon.
Everett Hindley: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We canvassed this issue last week, and for the member’s
benefit we’ll chat about it again here today, Mr. Speaker. This government
reached a $10‑a-day child care agreement on April 1st, 2023 — three years
ahead of schedule, Mr. Speaker — bringing early financial relief to families
and benefiting families across this province as quickly as possible.
[14:15]
We also strongly advocated
for a new agreement, a better agreement for Saskatchewan families, for
Saskatchewan child care providers across this province — one that was not being
advocated for by the members opposite. We know full well, Mr. Speaker, what they
were advocating for. This is a better child care agreement for families right
across Saskatchewan, one that this government is proud to have negotiated.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Saskatoon
Eastview.
Matt
Love: —
Mr. Speaker, this minister’s words are cold comfort to all those families whose
six-year-olds celebrate a birthday before April 1st. This isn’t the deal that
that minister promised to those parents. He then told child care operators,
those who joined us here today, that they have to do the work of going out and
telling families that their fees are increasing. This minister can’t deliver
the deal as advertised, he can’t break the bad news to parents, and he said
last week that he can’t fix this for families.
What does the minister say to
the operators, who again are here today in the galleries, about his failures
and his promise that he’s breaking to those families?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of Education.
Hon.
Everett Hindley: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This is a better agreement than the existing agreement
that we currently have right now, which expires on March 31st at the end of
this month, Mr. Speaker.
And the new agreement that
will take effect on April the 1st will provide for some additional coverage for
children who are in kindergarten who have turned the age of six, and provide
that coverage after April 1st. That’s when the new agreement, again, takes
effect and will benefit those families, and again families for years to come,
as this is part of the new program that was negotiated by this government, Mr.
Speaker.
These are changes that were
advocated for by the sector, one that our team worked hard to get into the
agreement for Saskatchewan, for this province. And this is a benefit for
families and for child care operators across Saskatchewan, one that is better than
the current agreement that we currently have in this province, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina Douglas
Park.
Nicole
Sarauer: —
Mr. Speaker, Saskatchewan leads the nation in intimate partner violence at
nearly double the national average. There were 737 victims of intimate partner
violence per 100,000 population in Saskatchewan last year compared to the
national average of just 349. Each of these numbers represents a person
traumatized, hurt, or sadly, killed.
To end intimate partner
violence, we need to recognize this crisis for what it is — an epidemic. Will
the Minister of Justice declare that intimate partner violence is an epidemic
in Saskatchewan?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of the Status of
Women.
Hon.
Alana Ross: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We recognize interpersonal violence is an issue in our
society, and that’s why we
invest $72 million annually across government and why we work with and
coordinate with our community partners, who are experts in this area. We
provide programming under the three pillars of the provincial strategy of
prevention, intervention, and accountability.
Mr.
Speaker, our government remains committed to building a strong, safe, and
secure Saskatchewan where all people are free from violence. Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina Douglas
Park.
Nicole
Sarauer: —
Mr. Speaker, intimate partner violence is more than just an issue; it’s an
epidemic. This is what the experts are saying, and this is what the experts are
calling for.
Brenda Ottenbreit, a survivor
of domestic violence and advocate, told the CBC [Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation] that declaring an epidemic in the province would draw more
attention to shortfalls in the legal system and could lead to life-saving
changes. BC [British Columbia] and Ontario have both recognized intimate
partner violence as an epidemic.
As legislators, Mr. Speaker,
we should take every opportunity to act to protect lives. So will the Minister
of Justice listen to the advocates, the survivors, and other provinces and
recognize that intimate partner violence is an epidemic in Saskatchewan?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of the Status of Women.
Hon.
Alana Ross: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We know interpersonal
violence is a deeply rooted societal problem that has devastating impacts on
individuals and requires a multi-faceted approach with commitment, Mr. Speaker,
which is what we are doing under our provincial interpersonal violence
strategy.
You know, we are making investments. We are working
with our community partners. As recently as in February we funded 10 of our
partner organizations to help address interpersonal violence, including a
rehabilitative camp in Buffalo Narrows for men who have caused harm,
counselling services in North Battleford, enhanced 211 services, and providing
a safe place for pets in the event people are afraid to leave because they’re
afraid to leave their pets.
Mr. Speaker, our government is committed to building
a strong, safe, and secure Saskatchewan. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the member from Saskatoon Fairview.
Vicki
Mowat: — Mr. Speaker, last Wednesday I asked the Minister
of Social Services if he would be willing to work a shift at the Frances
Morrison Library to understand the concerns that workers are facing in our
public libraries. The Minister of Rural and Remote Health answered for him and
said that he would be prepared to work this shift. She told this House, “I know
that my colleague would be more than happy to do that,
and he has confirmed with me that he would.”
So knowing that library
workers are eager to welcome the minister, when will he be working this shift?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon.
Terry Jenson: —
Mr. Speaker, all of this stems from some of the issues that we’re having in
downtown Saskatoon when it comes to individuals who may find themselves in a
very difficult state, Mr. Speaker. This is why we funded our provincial
approach to homelessness — $40.2 million in 2023 in foundational funding.
Mr. Speaker, in November we increased that by another $20 million.
This is a very, very serious
issue, one that we are working with our community municipal partners. We’re
also working with our Indigenous partners, Mr. Speaker. And it’s a meeting that
I’m going to be having with the library, and it’s coming very soon. Thank you,
Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Saskatoon
Fairview.
Vicki
Mowat: —
Mr. Speaker, simple question; looking for a simple answer. When will he be
working the shift at the library?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of Social Services.
Hon.
Terry Jenson: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And you know, to respond to the member, that work is
under way in terms of, you know, scheduling a meeting with the management of
the Saskatoon library.
What I would also like to
point out, Mr. Speaker, is the good work being done by our outreach teams. We
have sawêyihtotân in Saskatoon. These are individuals that are downtown in
different areas of the city, making contact with individuals that have no place
to go, trying to connect them with services, Mr. Speaker. This is a program
that’s operated by Saskatoon Tribal Council. I had a great conversation this
morning with Tribal Chief Arcand, and we’re really looking forward to keeping
that work going and providing those supports and those services to the
individuals who really, really badly need it. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Saskatoon
Westview.
April
ChiefCalf: —
Mr. Speaker, in February rents in Saskatchewan jumped yet another 6.5 per cent.
In Regina and Saskatoon rent went up by 8.2 per cent for apartments. This was
the highest increase in the country. British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and
Quebec have all seen rent decreases.
On
Friday I stood with Siobhán, a Saskatoon renter who works multiple jobs,
lives with three roommates, and still struggles to afford both rent and
groceries. Is this really what the Sask Party government wants for the people
of Saskatchewan, or will they stand up for people like Siobhán and pass The
Rent Control Act?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of Finance.
Hon.
Jim Reiter: —
Mr. Speaker, we’ve debated this on the floor of this Assembly many times over
the last number of months. We recognize that we are not immune to inflationary
pressures around the country. But, Mr. Speaker, it is important to remember we
are the most affordable province in the country.
Mr. Speaker, I would correct
the record on some of the numbers that the members opposite have been using.
Actually rent over the last decade, over 10 years in Saskatchewan, has grown by
31 per cent. That’s compared to 58 per cent nationally. Mr. Speaker, we still
feel that that’s high, but again rents are the most affordable in Saskatchewan
compared to the other provinces in the country.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina
Northeast.
Jacqueline
Roy: —
Now, Mr. Speaker, yesterday was International Women’s Day, a day to formally
acknowledge women’s struggles to take their equal place in society and to
commit to actually doing more. And there’s a lot more to be done in
Saskatchewan. We are one of the worst provinces in Canada for domestic
violence, yet that government won’t call it an epidemic. Sexual assault, one of
the worst provinces. Female homicide, teen pregnancy, child care deserts, the
gender pay gap, and women in non-traditional fields.
So this question is to the
Minister Responsible for the Status of Women, and I’ll thank her male
colleagues not to intervene. Does she acknowledge that her government is
failing women in all of the areas that I just addressed?
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the Minister of the Status of
Women.
Hon.
Alana Ross: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I can’t help but notice one of the indicators that the
member opposite indicated was employment for women. We had a wonderful event in
the House yesterday where we celebrated 70 leaders in Saskatchewan’s industry.
It is opportunities like this, Mr. Speaker, that will help move forward in our
battle with interpersonal violence. And we are proud of the initiatives that
women are taking and the educational opportunities being provided so that they
have the ability to do this, Mr. Speaker. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the Minister
of Health.
Hon.
Jeremy Cockrill: —
Well thank you, Mr. Speaker. This morning I had the privilege of joining the
Premier and several of my colleagues at the construction site at Saskatoon’s
first urgent care centre, Mr. Speaker, to announce the next steps our
government is taking to put patients first in this province by improving access
to health care for all Saskatchewan families. And I make note that it’s
Saskatoon’s first urgent care centre, Mr. Speaker, because there will be a
second urgent care centre, Mr. Speaker, to follow very soon in the city of
Saskatoon.
As was discussed in question
period, Mr. Speaker, we have introduced the patients-first health care plan
which is a comprehensive provincial strategy to improve access to care and
ensure everyone in Saskatchewan receives the right care in the right place at
the right time.
You know, across Canada, Mr.
Speaker, I think we’re all aware that health care is facing increasing
pressure. There’s rising demand for services, an aging population, and
workforce shortages in every single province.
Mr. Speaker, members on this
side of the House have been listening to Saskatchewan people. And with respect
to health care, we’ve clearly heard that families want two things: access to a
primary care provider and timelier access to diagnostics and surgeries. The
patients-first health care plan accelerates work that’s already under way to
improve access to health services by increasing the number of health care
providers and giving patients more health care options.
Mr. Speaker, there are 50
next steps outlined in the plan which centre around the following key actions:
increasing the number and expanding the scope of practice for all health care
professionals; expanding access to virtual care; increasing the number of and
access to urgent care centres throughout the province; continuing to recruit,
train, and increase the number of doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, and all
allied health care staff; and expansion of diagnostic services like MRI
[magnetic resonance imaging], CT [computerized tomography], and PET/CT
[positron emission tomography/computerized tomography] scans.
We will strengthen and grow
our health care workforce by adding 20 more medical school seats and 10 more
residency seats prioritizing Saskatchewan students, Mr. Speaker. And, Mr.
Speaker, I think it’s important to note when this party had the honour of forming
government in 2007, there were 60 College of Medicine undergraduate seats.
Today, Mr. Speaker, there’s 108, and in September there will be 128
undergraduate College of Medicine seats in this province, Mr. Speaker. But more
importantly, but more importantly, not only for members of this House, but for
all Saskatchewan residents, we are asking the College of Medicine to set a new
higher target, a more ambitious target, Mr. Speaker, of 95 per cent of those
128 seats being given to Saskatchewan students, Mr. Speaker.
[14:30]
Mr. Speaker, we’re continuing
to develop training pathways for high school students to bridge into careers in
the health care sector, adding 26 new nurse practitioner training seats across
the province which increases the nurse practitioner training capacity in the
province by 45 per cent, Mr. Speaker.
But, Mr. Speaker, the number
of seats, that’s only half the battle, Mr. Speaker. We need to make sure that
those seats are filled, Mr. Speaker. And that’s why we are adding a financial
incentive to support registered nurses who want to progress their career with
nurse practitioner training, Mr. Speaker — a $78,000 financial incentive, Mr.
Speaker. It will come with a return-of-service contract to make sure that those
NPs are working in our province, Mr. Speaker. But we’re very excited about
that.
Mr. Speaker, we’re also going
to be expanding access through the use of virtual care tools, as outlined in
question period earlier today, Mr. Speaker. Now, Mr. Speaker, to support faster
access and improve outcomes for critically ill patients, we’re going to
complete and staff the additional 69 out of 109 beds at Saskatoon City
Hospital, Mr. Speaker. Forty of those 109, Mr. Speaker, are already open,
already staffed, already seeing patients in them, Mr. Speaker.
We’re opening 24 acute care
beds and 4 ICU [intensive care unit] beds at St. Paul’s Hospital; 6 pediatric
beds at Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital; adding 36 acute care beds at Royal
University Hospital, Mr. Speaker. And I think especially important for the
pediatric patients in southern Saskatchewan, we’re going to be adding three
neonatal intensive care unit beds here at Regina General Hospital, Mr. Speaker,
to make sure that families in the southern half of the province can stay as
close to home to receive very intensive care, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, there are many
more actions being taken to put patients first under the plan that I didn’t
have time to go through today. But I hope that all members will have an
opportunity to read the plan and share in the House over the coming weeks.
I encourage all members to
take an opportunity to read the plan and understand the important work that’s
being done to put patients first in this province. I believe we all share the
desire in Saskatchewan for families to receive the best care in the country,
Mr. Speaker, and this plan will help us get there. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina
Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara
Conway: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to first thank the minister for providing me
with a copy of his remarks in advance. Interesting announcement followed
closely by myself this morning, Mr. Speaker. And when I saw this patients-first
health care plan, which I’ve had a little bit of time to review, but I will
have more to say certainly in the days to come.
I’ll
hearken back to the first Patient First Review we saw from this government; I
believe it was in 2009. I’ve got the OG here with me. And then we saw a Patient
First Review update in 2012, Mr. Speaker. And then today we have a
patients-first health care plan.
Unfortunately,
Mr. Speaker, the themes remain the same. These reports talk about surgeries.
They talk about diagnostics. They talk about
team-based primary care. They talk about expanding the scope of practice as a
solution to the crisis in our health care system.
I’ll take, for example, the
2015 update where this government says that in order to address some of the
issues they’re seeing, they’ll, “Expand scope of practice by removing
restrictions so professionals can work to full capacity of their training.”
That’s page 1 in 5 of this 2015 patient-first report.
And then in the 2026
patient-first report we see, “A commitment to expanding scope of practice so
providers work to the top of their scope.” That’s on page 18 of this so-called
patient-first 2026 report.
One thing that troubles me
about the difference of all these patient-first reports, Mr. Speaker, is that
back in 2009 and back in even 2015, Mr. Speaker, you saw a real commitment from
this government to committing to reducing, for example, wait times, putting
real-time metrics on some of these commitments.
Now all you see them talk
about is expanding capacity. Because they like to talk about volume, because
they know that despite all of their schemes and diagnostics and surgeries and
in the MRI, CT scan initiatives, Mr. Speaker, we actually don’t see wait times
reducing. We have some of the longest wait times for knee and hip surgery
continuously in this province, Mr. Speaker.
So they’ve completely, in
this new and improved, I guess, patient-first report, they’ve actually
completely abandoned any commitment to reducing wait times. And that should be
a huge red flag. This government loves to talk about volume and capacity. They
no longer make commitments around wait times because they know what they are
doing is not working, Mr. Speaker.
And when we talk about
recruitment and retention, Mr. Speaker — you know, I had a little bit of time
to review this — it talks about streamlining their current approaches,
expanding some of the approaches they currently have to a couple more
communities. But their approaches are not working, Mr. Speaker. They are not
working. So I’m afraid that we will continue to see more of the same, and it’s
very troubling to see this government propose this as big, bold change.
You know, we see them talking
about team-based health care. Well I’m sorry, Mr. Speaker. In 2009, and I will
again quote from that first patient-first health care report, they talk about
how health care is piecemeal and, “Team-based, interdisciplinary care remains
the exception rather than the rule. Saskatchewan is yet to realize the full
benefits of team-based care.” That is over a decade and a half ago, Mr.
Speaker, so forgive me.
There is a renewed commitment
to using nurse practitioners by this government in the last year, and I have
given them credit for that. But frankly it’s a bit of a slow clap because we’ve
had the evidence on the benefit of nurse practitioners to a team-based care
setting since the 1970s, Mr. Speaker.
So again and again what we
see from this government is too little, too late. So, Mr. Speaker, I will have
more to say about this patient-first health care plan in the days to come. And
with that I will take my place in the House. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — Why is the member on her
feet?
Aleana
Young: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Notwithstanding the government’s agenda and
what’s published in Orders of the Day today, I request leave to move the
following motion:
That the
Assembly immediately consider second reading of Bill No. 612, The Lower
Power Bills and Car Insurance Act.
Speaker
Goudy: — Will the member briefly
state the purpose of the motion and read the text of the motion . . .
[inaudible].
Is leave granted?
Some
Hon. Members: — No.
Some
Hon. Members: — Yes.
Speaker
Goudy: — Leave is not granted.
And I have a letter from the
King. It’s not a text, but it’s a letter.
Speaker
Goudy: — Would you all please
rise.
We join
together on this Commonwealth Day at a time of great challenge and great
possibility. Across our world, communities and nations face increasing
pressures of conflict, climate change and rapid transformation. Yet it is often
in such testing moments that the enduring spirit of the Commonwealth is most
clearly revealed.
Ours is
a remarkable association that spans every ocean and continent. Embracing an extraordinary
diversity of culture, language and faith, our Commonwealth family is united by
shared values of justice, democracy, opportunity, compassion and mutual
respect. In a world that can feel increasingly fragmented, this voluntary union
of free association remains rare and precious — a forum for open and honest
discussion and debate to help improve the lives of the nearly three billion
people who call our Member States home.
Our
Commonwealth of Nations holds untapped potential for prosperous trade between
trusting partners. With nearly two-thirds of our population under the age of
thirty, we are a family defined by youth and possibility. It is our shared
responsibility to ensure that they inherit not only our hope and ambition, but
also a world in which they can flourish.
That
inheritance depends upon the health of our planet and on the restoration of the
natural world on which we depend. Across so many parts of our Commonwealth
climate change is not an abstract or a distant threat, but a lived reality. The
stewardship of Nature, the protection of oceans and forests, and the pursuit of
prosperity secured in harmony with the natural world are duties we owe not only
to one another, but to generations yet unborn.
As we
look ahead to the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Antigua and
Barbuda later this year, we are reminded that the great gatherings of our
nations are strengthened by the daily endeavours of their people. What
distinguishes the Commonwealth is not only what our governments resolve
together, but what our people do each day in countless acts of service,
enterprise and creativity. When leaders meet, they do so on behalf of millions
whose quiet determination, resilience and generosity give true meaning to our
shared endeavour.
Working
together we can ensure that the Commonwealth continues to stand as a force for
good — grounded in community, committed to the kind of restorative
sustainability that has a return on investment, enriched by culture, steadfast
in its care for our planet, and united in friendship and in the service of its
people.
Charles
R
Thank you. Please be seated.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Warren
Kaeding that Bill No. 24 — The
Saskatchewan Internal Trade Promotion Act be now read a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: —
I recognize the member from Regina Mount
Royal.
Trent
Wotherspoon: —
Mr. Speaker, it’s my pleasure to enter in with respect to Bill No. 24, The
Saskatchewan Internal Trade Promotion Act, Mr. Speaker. Now I know we’ve
also had a bill brought forward on this front by the member for Riversdale,
brought forward private member’s legislation on this front.
That also highlights the
importance of making sure that we’re able to expand those trade markets around
this world and able to get our products to market. So then leaning into the
kind of trade-supporting infrastructure — transportation infrastructure that’s
critical to this province and to this country, including of course pipelines
and pipeline capacity, Mr. Speaker — but reforms as well, to make sure that our
rails perform for shippers and exporters and producers from this province, to
make sure that our ports have the capacity that they simply don’t right now,
Mr. Speaker.
So although we would never
invite the kinds of behaviour and threats that we’ve received from the current
American president, the impetus that it’s caused for us to look at controlling
what we can control is an important one. These are things we could have been
acting on many years ago, urgings that we’ve brought forward as an official
opposition. But it’s critical that we act around addressing unreasonable trade
barriers within our country. And then very importantly, making sure that we
build and diversify trade markets around the world and that we build that
trade-supporting transportation infrastructure — pipelines, rails, and ports —
to get our products to market, Mr. Speaker.
I know that in consulting
with our lead on this side with respect to trade, the member for Riversdale who
brought forward a piece of legislation on this front, she’s identified very
clearly that the piece of legislation she brought forward does a much better
job of protecting the occupational health and safety rights of workers.
Certainly that’s critical, Mr. Speaker. So I’d urge the attention of this
Assembly to that matter, and we’d invite the public to engage on this as well,
Mr. Speaker.
And again as I’d say, Mr.
Speaker, we need to expand trade markets. We need to be able to build a
transportation system that allows our producers and exporters and shippers to
get those products to market. And then we need a government that’s going to act
and lead on those fronts, Mr. Speaker. For far too long, when I think of our
province and this provincial government, they’ve been far too complacent on
this front. And the outcomes just haven’t been what they need to be, Mr.
Speaker.
And we need to build trade
for this province and in our country. For far too long, Mr. Speaker, this is a
government that hasn’t stepped up to the plate on that front, and all too often
has shipped our dollars and our jobs outside of Saskatchewan all the way to the
United States and countries around the world as opposed to focusing on the best
interests of this province and this country and the workers and businesses
within it, Mr. Speaker.
[14:45]
With that being said, I will
move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 24.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that
Bill
No. 31 — The Defamation Act be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Nathaniel
Teed: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It’s an honour to be on my feet to
enter into adjourned debate on Bill No. 31, The Defamation Act. And
as I was looking through some of the comments left by my colleagues and the
comments from the minister when the bill was introduced as well as some of the
news that was put out around the legislation, it’s interesting to see this
piece hit the floor. And one of the things I noted very early on is that it is
a piece of legislation that works to replace an almost 100‑year-old piece
of legislation from 1909, The Libel and Slander Act, Mr. Speaker.
And so important updates that
we’re seeing here in this space, Mr. Speaker. What we see from this is that it
looks like we’re looking to modernize the way that folks can . . .
that the Act in itself refers to defamation or slander or libel. You know, in
1909, at the time, it referred specifically just to newspapers, and we know
that in 100 years media has changed quite drastically. And so what we’re seeing
is a law now that applies to all publications, including digital and online
media, you know, not just the traditional print outlets.
Mr. Speaker, we see the
legislation authorizing the courts to make takedown or re-indexing orders
against third parties when harmful content continues to circulate after the
publication and establishes a single cause of action for publication and any
later republications of that same information, Mr. Speaker.
You know, again, very welcome
modernization in the space as it seems that this has come from a consultation
and work that was done in the legal community, Mr. Speaker. The Law Reform
Commission of Saskatchewan had released its final report calling on the reform
and modernization of that libel and slander Act, and they are commenting on how
the Act does get it right. Outdated distinction between libel and slander
refers instead to defamation now, which encompasses both written and spoken
statements. And so they took that information. We’re happy to see that come
through.
You know, Mr. Speaker, we’re
seeing an age where almost anyone can go online under their own name or under a
pseudonym and make all sorts of statements on the internet. And you know, I
think that it is important that this legislation first and foremost looks at
combatting misinformation, the ability to get misinformation down. What we’ve
seen is big tech giants have left the space of monitoring their creations, and
so we’re seeing those entities no longer policing or patrolling or doing the
work to ensure that information is solid on their platforms. And so hopefully
something like this will also continue to do that.
Mr. Speaker, I know that our
shadow minister of Justice will continue to do this work. We had some questions
about the bill that I know that she will aptly take care of. But you know, in
the old libel and slander Act, the definition of “malicious intent” that strips
privilege is vague, and so again there’s a lot of concern.
There is the concern around
parliamentary privilege, the things that we are allowed to say here on this
floor. We have a certain amount of privilege in that those statements are
protected so that we can have fulsome debate on topics. You know, Mr. Speaker,
we’ve seen a lot of debate around representing facts in this House, Mr.
Speaker. And so I think that there is a real need to ensure that we’re being as
precise as possible with the legislation so that, you know, places like this
legislature aren’t pulled into . . . or the things that are said on
this floor are respected under that parliamentary privilege, Mr. Speaker.
And so, happy to be on my
feet to talk to this bill, happy to see this modernization. And at this time I
will move to adjourn debate on Bill 31.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is it the
pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill
No. 32 — The Defamation Consequential Amendments Act, 2025/Loi de 2025
corrélative de la loi intitulée The Defamation Act be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Nathaniel
Teed: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Happy to be on my feet again speaking
to the consequential amendments Act portion of The Defamation Act, Bill No. 32. Left some comments on the record
here as far as Bill 31 is respected. I will ask folks to look to those remarks
as far as the feelings that I have placed on the record as far as The
Defamation Act.
And so,
Mr. Deputy Speaker, at this time I’m happy to adjourn debate on Bill
No. 32, The Defamation Consequential Amendments Act, 2025.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is it the
pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim
McLeod that Bill No. 33 — The
Credit Union Amendment Act, 2025
be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Saskatoon Westview.
April
ChiefCalf: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I’m pleased to be able to enter into debate
today on Bill 33, An Act to amend The Credit Union Act. Now, Mr. Deputy
Speaker, my understanding is that this bill is meant to update The Credit
Union Act of 1988, and these updates will apply to termination of
memberships, how to deal with the funds of terminated members, thresholds for
passing regulations, and abilities of employees for accessing member lists.
On our side of the House, Mr.
Deputy Speaker, we wish to consult with stakeholders to ensure that these
amendments proposed in Bill 33 will benefit credit unions and their members and
enhance the efficiency of their operations.
Now we understand that credit
unions have a long history in our province, having been established to assist
people in the 1930s during the Great Depression, and they’re part of a larger
movement of co‑operative organizations and philosophies that are very
much a foundation of our province.
In my family, we have always
relied on credit unions as primary financial institutions. And I just wanted to
mention that my daughter, when she graduated from high school and she was 17
years old, she got her first real job working as a customer service representative
at the credit union in La Ronge.
And we were very proud of
her, but we were a little concerned because you know how when you have kids,
you ask them when they’re around age eight what they want to be when they grow
up, and her response is, I want to be one of those shopping girls that I see on
TV. So like at that point we were really worried. But she got this job at the
credit union and she just blossomed. She learned so much during her time there
that she felt extremely comfortable giving me and my husband a great deal of
financial advice.
And I just wanted to note too
that credit unions have been foundational as well in serving smaller
communities. So a lot of people don’t know that in northern Saskatchewan,
there’s actually only two communities in all of northern Saskatchewan that have
financial institutions, and that’s Buffalo Narrows and La Ronge. And those
financial institutions are of course credit unions.
On that note, Mr. Speaker, I
would like to say also that we’re very proud of our credit unions and how they
keep our Saskatchewan money in the province and support our communities in many
ways.
And I would now like to
adjourn debate on Bill 33. Thank you.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: —
The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to
adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Colleen Young
that Bill No. 35 — The Mineral
Resources Amendment Act, 2025 be
now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Regina University.
Sally
Housser: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Delighted to get a chance to rise
today to speak on Bill No. 35, The Mineral Resources Amendment Act.
This is a bill that really is meant to streamline and enhance the mineral
exploration process here in Saskatchewan. It establishes rules for designated
subsurface development areas, or DSDAs, that maximizes mineral exploration and
extraction.
This is something that in
speaking and consulting with a lot of stakeholders, a lot of folks in the
mining industry here, very much supportive. This is essentially to allow
exploration in areas where the owner of the land cannot necessarily be
determined. You have to try to find that person for a period of five years. If
you can’t, you are able to explore. And if even after five years, an ownership
of that land is determined, then any kind of a resource or wealth extracted
from that area will be held in trust for that individual at a later date.
So this is not a scenario
where anybody is losing out. This simply allows mining exploration to go ahead
and not be impeded because somebody can’t find the ownership for one specific
plot of land.
Ultimately it’s a really
exciting time for mining and exploration in the province of Saskatchewan, not
only with our world-class potash and uranium industries, Mr. Deputy Speaker,
but also with new developments or new discoveries around aluminum and of course
in our rare earth and critical minerals.
And with that, Mr. Speaker, I
would like to allow this bill, or I’m happy to allow Bill No. 35, The
Mineral Resources Amendment Act to move to the committee. Thank you.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Okay. Is it the pleasure
of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried. To which committee shall this bill be committed?
Hon.
Tim McLeod: —
To the Standing Committee on the Economy, Mr. Speaker.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — This bill stands
committed to the Standing Committee on the Economy.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Jeremy Cockrill that Bill No. 36 — The Change of Name
Amendment Act, 2025/Loi modificative de 2025 sur le changement de nom be
now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: —
I recognize the member from Regina Pasqua.
Bhajan
Brar: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Mr. Deputy Speaker, before this, my colleague
from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood had participated on this bill. And in
continuation to that, I am honoured to enter into debate and provide some
comments for Bill No. 36, The Change of Name Amendment Act, 2025.
Mr. Deputy Speaker, I am
pleased to see the amendments to modernize this legislation to address a
barrier that a number of Saskatchewan residents face when requesting a name
change. This amendment would allow for people to register a single name and
more than two surnames. In southern cultures people don’t write their last
name, so they face difficulty when requesting a licence here in Saskatchewan.
So this change is a necessity.
Mr. Deputy Speaker, I have
personal experience with this changing of names. One of my relatives
experienced difficulty when he came to Canada in October 2015. His name is
Gurjit Singh. Singh is a middle name in India, and we rarely use our last name
there, like how my last name is Brar and my relative’s last name is Gill. He
had issues getting his licence from India recognized by SGI because his licence
from India was Gurjit Singh, but his passport had his last name Gill.
Ultimately with the help of a lawyer, he was able to get the professional
licence.
[15:00]
Mr. Deputy Speaker, I also
want to note that for the section on notifying police of any name change, we
will certainly need to consult with stakeholders to ensure that notification of
police is done safely and responsibly.
Mr. Deputy Speaker, with that
I move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 36. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Jeremy Cockrill that Bill No. 37 — The Vital Statistics
Amendment Act, 2025/Loi modificative de 2025 sur les services de l’état civil
be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Regina Pasqua.
Bhajan
Brar: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I am pleased to be on my feet again to discuss
Bill No. 37, The Vital Statistics Amendment Act. Once again, Mr.
Deputy Speaker, ensuring that we are modernizing naming regulation in this
province is a necessity to remove barriers for so many in Saskatchewan.
I already discussed some
personal experiences a relative of mine had with registering their name when
immigrating to Canada. And, Mr. Deputy Speaker, it is encouraging to see that
the government is ensuring more protections for vulnerable people. This is
especially important as Saskatchewan has the worst record in Canada for
intimate partner violence.
With that I would like to
move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 37. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Everett Hindley that Bill No. 38 — The Building Schools
Faster Act be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Regina Walsh Acres.
Jared
Clarke: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It’s a pleasure to be on my feet to enter into
debate on Bill No. 38, The Building Schools Faster Act, 2025. So
let’s chat about this Act for a few minutes here.
You know, the government’s
looking to build schools faster. So I think this bill speaks to the failure of
this government in terms of planning for the population growth that they have
been working for for a long time. So over the last 10 years this government has
made it its core priority to grow Saskatchewan’s population, an admirable goal.
Nothing wrong with that, Mr. Speaker. However what we have seen is lacking is
the plan to ensure that the growth is supported by the necessary infrastructure
in this province.
So the fact that we have a
bill before us saying we need to build schools faster suggests that they have
not planned adequately for the population growth that Saskatchewan has seen. If
we had, there would be schools being built as neighbourhoods are being built,
as people are moving into communities. And we wouldn’t be in this situation
where Saskatchewan schools are bursting at the seams, where students are packed
into the libraries, packed into staff rooms to learn and to get their education
here in Saskatchewan.
So I am glad to see that the
government is recognizing that it has not kept up with what is needed in terms
of the education needs of students in this province. But this is a bigger piece
in terms of education in Saskatchewan. We have seen funding declines in this
province when other provinces have increased their funding year after year. We
are going in the wrong direction.
And you know who is hurt by
this, Mr. Deputy Speaker? It’s Saskatchewan students, Saskatchewan youth, and
ultimately Saskatchewan. I mean when I think about the innovation, the
creativity that we have in this province, those come from people who have had
good quality education. And when we are not supporting students in the best way
that this province can — we are not providing those students with opportunities
to be creative, to learn, to think critically, to all of the skills that they
need to be innovators, to be entrepreneurs, to be whatever jobs are there in
the future in this province — those kids aren’t going to have necessarily the
skills.
And so we need to be funding
education properly in this province. Let’s look at educational assistants just
in this last year. We see that there are fewer EAs [educational assistant] in
Saskatchewan schools this year compared to last year. That is a failure. I can
speak, you know, personally as a former teacher. I’ve only been out of the
classroom for about two and a half years now. But when I was in the classroom,
EAs at that point, we were at such a strain already that EAs were really
focused on managing behavioural issues with many students. Not much of their
time was actually used to support students academically and ensuring that those
students were getting the support academically to succeed.
That’s just one small piece
of this puzzle, Mr. Speaker, but I think it speaks to the larger need and the
larger failures that are happening from this government when it comes to
education in the province.
But if we look at this bill
in particular, you know, this bill only applies to new schools. And I think
that is problematic because there are a lot of schools in Saskatchewan that are
crumbling, that need infrastructure capital investment to make sure that they
are in a condition that is beneficial for student learning.
One example I’ll give is, I
think about both of the schools that I taught at in Regina here, old schools
built in the ’20s, I think, and built in the ’70s. Neither of them had air
conditioning, and on days in May and June and September the schools can be
. . . In some of those rooms it would be 34 degrees. I mean if this
was another workplace in Saskatchewan, occupational health and safety would say
that is not a safe working environment. And yet this is what’s happening in
schools, and these are conditions that are happening in many, many schools
across this province.
So yes, we do need to build
schools faster, Mr. Deputy Speaker. We needed to build schools faster 5, 10
years ago when we were seeing populations growing in this province. But we also
need to be funding those existing schools. And we need to be ensuring the
education system in this province is fully funded so that Saskatchewan students
get the best education that they can, and then Saskatchewan as a province and
as an economy prospers in the future. With that, I will move to adjourn debate
on Bill No. 38. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Everett Hindley that Bill No. 39 — The Building Schools
Faster Consequential Amendment Act, 2025/Loi de 2025 corrélative de la loi intitulée The Building Schools Faster
Act be now read a
second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Regina Walsh Acres.
Jared
Clarke: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Again good to be on my feet to enter into Bill
No. 39, The Building Schools Faster Consequential Amendment Act, 2025.
I think my comments from Bill 38 made the points I wanted to make, so I will
move to adjourn debate.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Daryl Harrison that Bill No. 40 — The Animal Protection
Amendment Act, 2025 be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from Regina Pasqua.
Bhajan
Brar: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Before my colleague from Saskatoon Fairview
debated for this bill, and today I rise again on my feet in the Assembly to
enter into debate for Bill No. 40, The Animal Protection Act, 2025.
Mr. Deputy Speaker, every
person is a social animal, and every species on this planet has the right to
live with dignity. And that is the only way that we can be in balance with
nature. Well due to changes in the weather, a lot of things are happening in
the world. Some of the species are eliminated due to changes in the
environment. So it becomes our foremost duty to ensure that every person and
animal should be protected.
Mr. Deputy Speaker, it is
important to the people of Saskatchewan that all animals are taken good care
of, so it is good to see more transparency and accountability around animal
welfare. Well I know that our team is connecting with stakeholders, especially
those in the livestock industry, to ensure that they have no concerns with this
bill.
So it is the necessity of the
hour that the bill should be passed. To protect the animals, I support this
bill. And with this, Mr. Speaker, I move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 40.
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Alana Ross that Bill No. 41 — The Heritage
Recognition (From Many Peoples, Strength) Act/Loi sur la reconnaissance du
patrimoine (Nos origines multiples, notre force) be now read a second
time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Nathaniel
Teed: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Honoured to be on my feet again to
enter into adjourned debate on Bill No. 41, The Heritage Recognition
(From Many Peoples, Strength) Act.
Earlier or perhaps it was
last session, we saw a piece of private member’s legislation — and for those
watching from home, one of the rare moments a piece of private member’s
legislation made it to the floor of our Chamber. But we saw a piece of private member’s
legislation around recognizing Sikh Heritage Month, Mr. Deputy Speaker. And you
know, as a House we united and we passed that private member’s bill, enshrining
Sikh Heritage Month in the proclamations that we see from the provincial
government.
Now, Mr. Speaker, I will hold
a lot of my thoughts on the fact that not many private members’ bills do make
it to the floor. We have a number on our side of the House right now that I
would love to see fulsomely debated. Well I guess it would be nice to see our
official opposition speak to those bills, as many of the government members
never do really speak to adjourned debates.
Although it’s that point in
the session where I would challenge my colleagues opposite to join in and come
and . . . Welcome to the adjourned debate process. We would love to
hear from you and have fulsome debates on these bills, Mr. Deputy Speaker. But
I will digress. My challenge and my call to government members usually falls on
deaf ears and we never really get to see the government members stand up and
speak to adjourned debates. But again I will digress.
The heritage recognition, in
the way that the legislation is worked here, we’re seeing an amendment to the
legislation moving a lot of the proclamations from the physical text of the
legislation to regulations. And so a little bit of inside baseball for the
legislature is that, you know, a physical text of that legislation can only be
changed when it comes before the House, is moved through all the processes, and
gets Royal Assent and becomes law.
But what we’re seeing here is
that when you move some of the pieces from that legislation into a document
called the regulations, which allows and gives the ministry more ability to
make amendments, changes, fine tune smaller pieces of information, that makes
sure that the Act continues to work going forward.
And so in this case we’re
happy to see, you know, that none of the previous recognitions are being
changed, but instead being moved into regulation which gives the minister and
the ministry more ability to make new proclamations. And what we’re seeing is
that, you know, those heritage events or proclamations, you know, we’re going
to see those. If they’re moved into regulations, they will continue to maintain
an annual status. There is opportunity again in those regulations that if
something is coming about that we can, you know, change that so it’s not
annual; maybe it’s a one-time thing, celebration.
And so it’s quite nice to
see. You know, in some cases I think in legislation regulations are helpful. I
think there’s some debate around the merit sometimes as moving a lot of meat
and potatoes into regulations means taking it out of law. In this case I think
it’s a really good plan.
[15:15]
You know, I do miss being the
Parks, Culture and Sport critic, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I think the ministry and
the work of the minister is so important and, you know, you get to see so many
aspects of our province. And you get to go in every direction really. Like the
opportunities are endless really. I’m sure the invites to the minister come
fast and furious for cultural events and activities, be it film festivals or
those things. They just happen all over the province.
And every community, you
know, has the ability to, you know, to continue to build culture in their
corner of the province. And so, you know, it was with a heavy heart that I saw
the Parks, Culture and Sport critic portfolio leave after the 2024 election.
But it’s been taken into some very capable hands.
But you know, Mr. Speaker, I
welcome this piece of legislation. And you know, and as I mentioned in my
member’s statement earlier about the power of representation for communities,
for cultural groups, seeing their cultural month proclaimed by the provincial
government is so important and so valued within those cultural groups.
And so to see that the
government is looking to make it easier to ensure that, you know, cultural
groups who want to see their month proclaimed, that they are able to just reach
out to the ministry, that they’re able to get that proclamation made and we don’t
have to come to the legislature and pass individual Acts one after another to
recognize their important months.
And so, you know, at this
time, Mr. Speaker, I think I’ve left enough comments on the record as far as
the heritage recognition Act goes. We’re excited to see the continuation
of heritage months and days, and special celebrations within cultural and
community across the province.
And I know that our shadow
minister for Parks, Culture and Sport and some of the folks on our team who
represent communities and cultural groups in Saskatchewan will continue to
engage with stakeholders and work closely with the Ministry of Parks, Culture
and Sport so that we can continue to recognize the important tapestry that
builds our province.
So, Mr. Deputy Minister, at
this time I’m happy to adjourn debate on Bill No. 41, the heritage
recognition Act.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Agreed.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Eric Schmalz
that Bill No. 43 — The
Municipalities Modernization and Red Tape Reduction Act be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: —
I recognize the member from Regina University.
Sally
Housser: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I’m delighted to be able to rise today
and enter into debate on Bill No. 43, The Municipalities Modernization
and Red Tape Reduction Act, as a number of my colleagues have commented on
this bill before me. It’s one of the thicker ones we see before the legislature
right now, so I will try to highlight just a couple of things from a few of the
key areas of this Act.
We
have this looking at streamlining some of the processes. And I’ll speak a
little more to it. We want to be able to have, you know, the most streamlined
processes. And unfortunately sometimes when we talk about the reduction of red
tape, you can get into throwing the baby out with the bathwater or frankly
consolidating a lot of the services within the minister’s office as opposed to
actually helping municipalities streamline a process. So there’s a lot to
unpack in this bill, and we will continue to be consulting with stakeholders
and reviewing over the course of its bill cycle.
One
thing in mind. My colleague from Saskatoon Meewasin had pointed this out, and I
have looked a little more into this, is how you determine what is a hamlet,
what is a village, what is a town, what is a city. That’s going to streamline
this process. So organized hamlets no longer have to prove that you have been
an organized hamlet for three years before you have to apply to become a
village. That seems to make an awful lot of sense to me, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
This
also provides some updating and changes to how dangerous animals are dealt
with, whether in kind of in unprovoked attacks or if an owner is liable. It
provides some opportunities for police to seize animals that they believe are
dangerous and how to proceed from there, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
You
know, one thing that I, you know, I think we can all on this side of the
legislature agree on very broadly is an updating to The Municipalities Act
on issues of ethics. Councils will now have to have a code of ethics, and
you’ll have to have orientation for all new municipal councillors and make sure
that everybody is aware of the Sask employment Act’s harassment policies.
The changes to the ethics in this Act will also allow for councils to appoint
an Indigenous advisor, and also that councils must publish documents and
notices on their website.
Mr. Speaker, one thing that
this changes as well is for bylaw fines. And of course bylaw fines — people
shouldn’t be breaking the bylaws, and you don’t want to get fined — but they
now can be added to your property taxes, which brings me to a point here.
Obviously some of these changes make sense. Some of them are very much common
sense. But again what looks like sometimes the red tape reduction can also, on
the same size, look a lot like centralizing power in the minister’s office,
which I think we’ve seen a lot more of.
And if you really wanted to
help municipalities in this respect, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I think most people at
SARM [Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities] — where I’m sure myself
and a number of our colleagues as well as the members from the government at
SARM or SUMA [Saskatchewan Urban Municipalities Association] were really
talking with anybody in municipalities — they would say the best way to help
municipalities is to stop downloading so many of the key roles of the
provincial government onto municipalities.
Many of the municipalities
have legislation which does not allow them to go into deficit and debt, which
means that when the province just downloads a lot of these issues —
particularly I’m thinking around having to deal with issues of houselessness
and mental health and addictions in our urban cores — they have no appeal other
than to raise their property taxes, which we’ve seen pretty extreme hikes
certainly where I represent in Regina, and Saskatoon as well.
But as I said, Mr. Deputy
Speaker, an awful lot to unpack in this piece of legislation. And we will be
reviewing it carefully, and naturally consulting a lot with our municipal
counterparts across the province. And with that, Mr. Speaker, I’d move to adjourn
debate on Bill No. 43, The Municipalities Modernization and Red Tape
Reduction Act. Thank you.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill No. 44 — The Co‑operatives
Act, 2025/Loi de 2025 sur les coopératives be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Regina Wascana Plains.
Brent
Blakley: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. On my feet this afternoon to enter debate on
Bill No. 44, The Co‑operatives Act, 2025. This bill will meld
The Co-operatives Act from 1996 and the new-generation co‑operatives
Act, which will modernize and align with other jurisdictions.
It also brings forth
multi-stakeholder co‑ops where member owners can be consumers, producers,
or volunteers. Co‑op shares can be more easily sold to non-members to
raise capital, basically enhancing the avenues for growth and investment.
Co‑ops have a
long-standing history, a rich history in this province. They’ve been the
backbone of many rural communities and in the past several years have an
ever-growing presence in urban areas as well. As I mentioned before, my family
comes from Bethune, Saskatchewan. Sitting in the middle of the town are the co‑op
grocery store, the co‑op gas station, the co‑op lumber yard, and
just recently opened up a co‑op cardlock facility just off the highway.
My grandmother worked at the
grocery store as a cashier for many years. My great-grandfather, my
grandfather, and my dad were all co‑op members, and I’ve continued that
tradition as a proud co‑op member. And I’m sure there are countless
instances where this is the case across every corner of small-town Saskatchewan
as well. Co‑ops are so important in keeping our dollars in the province
and getting the community invested in an enterprise.
As I said at the outset, this
bill amalgamates past and current Acts on the books, streamlining and
modernizing membership and investment. It’s quite an involved bill and will
require some extensive consultation with stakeholders. My colleagues and the shadow
minister will also enter the debate on this bill. For now, Mr. Deputy Speaker,
I move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 44, The Co‑operatives Act,
2025.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim
McLeod that Bill No. 45 — The Co‑operatives
Consequential Amendments Act, 2025 be now read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Regina Wascana Plains.
Brent
Blakley: —
Thank you again, Mr. Deputy Speaker. On my feet to enter debate on Bill
No. 45, The Co‑operatives Consequential Amendments Act, 2025.
You may consider my remarks brought forth on the previous Bill No. 44 to
also apply to this bill as they are so closely related. Nothing more to add at
this time, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
I move to adjourn debate on
Bill No. 45, The Co‑operatives Consequential Amendments Act, 2025.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod:
— The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to
adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members:
— Agreed.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod:
— Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim
McLeod that Bill No. 47 — The
Response to Illicit Drugs Act be
now read a second time.]
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod:
— I recognize the member from Saskatoon Meewasin.
Nathaniel Teed: — Thank
you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Again an honour to be on my feet here to
enter into adjourned debate on Bill No. 47, The Response to Illicit
Drugs Act.
Mr.
Deputy Speaker, no crisis I think is more important or pressing in our time
right now than how governments and our cities and our, you know, all the CBOs that
we deal with, how they are addressing this absolutely out-of-control moment
that we’re seeing of drugs entering our communities and harming our loved ones
and capturing people in a life of addiction.
Mr.
Deputy Speaker, this is a really, really important piece of legislation to be
discussing and to be analyzing here on the floor. As I have reviewed through
some of them, I’ll thank the minister for his remarks and thank my colleagues
for their remarks on the record. And reviewing through the news release and
etc., it looks as though that this government is using all the tools in its
tool box to align our legislation here in this province more closely in line
with federal legislation and ensuring that the court system is able to address
this illicit drug crisis that we’re seeing.
And
so, you know, someone I think with probably a little bit more legal background
than me will probably understand it a little bit more than I will here or
there. But you know, when diving into the Act, some of the things that we’re
looking at are ensuring that there are rules and regulations that the courts
can access, you know, when drug crimes are done, making it a tort or a civil
crime to commit a drug-related crime that injures someone else.
You
know, the Act looks at being able to allow the government to recoup costs from
drug-crime-related injury or disease on behalf of victims. They need to
identify, you know, individuals or prove that they are the cause of the
injuries. And there is a basis in this Act that allow in cases of multiple
defendants, you know, if it can’t be proved which specific one caused the
injury, the court can find them all guilty again.
[15:30]
And you know, I’m just going
through some of the facets of this Act. You know, like as I said before, it is
the challenge of every sitting government in our country right now as how we
are addressing this very, very important issue.
There’s probably not anybody
in this room who hasn’t been affected by that drug crisis. I know that my
partner lost a cousin, a family member, to the illicit drug crisis. And you
know, it’s shocking when it happens to you and your family, and my heart goes
out to anyone who’s had a friend or family member, you know . . . But
I think we’re almost at this point of a little bit of numbness in realizing
that this is happening so often. And like I said, now it’s almost as though no
one is unaffected by this drug crisis.
And so, Mr. Deputy Speaker,
what we think is really important on this side of the House is just to make
sure that barriers for folks who want to access treatment for addictions get
the treatment. You know, we were looking for that data, just how many people
are on waiting lists across Saskatchewan for these beds, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
You know, my colleague will
speak to the compassionate care Act next, another important piece of
legislation that we have to get right. But we’re saying, you know, if someone
. . . We need to get to a point when the person makes the decision to
change their life, that they are able to access that care right away. I don’t
know if we’re there yet, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I think we have to continue to
work towards that point.
You know, we have to continue
to look at the causes of why, you know, this crime is being committed. You
know, during our provincial election we spoke on doorsteps across this province
about the need to get tough on crime. And you know what? This is part of that
tough-on-crime agenda, but we can’t forget that we have to also be tough on the
causes of crime. We have to continue investing in supports, not cutting them,
ensuring that folks who are looking for the support can get access to those
supports right away.
You know, Mr. Speaker, I
think, you know, for sure on this side of the House we will continue to support
evidence-based treatment for addictions, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I’m happy to have
been able to speak to this bill, to analyze it, to put some comments on the
record. I think that, you know, for everyone in this province this is an
important piece of legislation that we get right.
So, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I
know that my colleagues and the shadow ministers will continue to engage with
stakeholders and continue to see how we can make this piece of legislation
better. Ask questions in committee. So at this time I’m happy to adjourn debate
on Bill No. 47, The Response to Illicit Drugs Act.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the
adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Lori Carr that Bill No. 48 — The Compassionate
Intervention Act be now
read a second time.]
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member
from Regina Wascana Plains.
Brent
Blakley: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. On my feet this afternoon again speaking on Bill
No 48, The Compassionate Intervention Act. Some of the points I’ll be
covering were the same, very similar to what my colleague just covered, so they
will sound very familiar.
Mr. Speaker, I think both
sides can agree that the illicit drug problem in this province is at a crisis
level. We hear every day of the number of calls that our EMS [emergency medical
services] are called out on to deal with overdose incidents. We absolutely
realize this problem is out of control and more needs to be done to address
this crisis and especially the root causes of the problem — things such as
poverty, homelessness, mental illness.
We also have a system of drug
treatment in this province that is not meeting the needs of people because of
the lack of care beds or the lack of facilities or the lack of funding. And
because of this, treatment is not available when people need it or when they’re
ready for it, as the member said. If more resources were put into these areas,
perhaps we wouldn’t be talking about compassionate intervention, but here we
are having to introduce a punitive course of action rather than putting
resources into proactively dealing with the root causes of the problem.
It’s evident that something
has to be done to change course to prevent the loss of so many to addiction, to
overdose, and to drug poisoning. As this compassionate intervention Act gets
rolled out, it’s imperative for the government to get it right because there’s
so many things that can go wrong. Consultation with others in other agencies
will be the key as the government moves forward.
And again, I trust my
colleagues and the shadow ministers will have more to say as they enter the
debate. Mr. Speaker, I move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 48, The
Compassionate Intervention Act.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has moved to
adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod:
— Carried. I recognize the Government House Leader.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Mr.
Deputy Speaker, I move that the Assembly do now adjourn.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod:
— Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members:
— Agreed.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod:
— Carried. The Assembly now stands adjourned until tomorrow at 1:30 p.m.
[The
Assembly adjourned at 15:36.]
Published
under the authority of the Hon. Todd Goudy, Speaker
Disclaimer:
The electronic versions of the Legislative Assembly’s documents are provided on
this site for informational purposes only. The Clerk is responsible for the
records of each legislature.