CONTENTS
Saskatchewan
Filmmaker Tells Local Stories
High
School Basketball Team Raises Funds for Cancer Research
Big
Brothers Big Sisters Empower Saskatchewan Youth
Pro
Rodeo Volunteer Recognized for Years of Service
Call
to Action for Education on Domestic Violence
Saskatchewan
Doctor Paved the Way for Universal Health Care
Canadian
Western Agribition Showcases Saskatchewan to the World
Property
Taxes and Supports for Municipalities
Power
Rates and Fiscal Management
Health
Care Staffing and Rural Emergency Departments
Child
Care Agreement with Federal Government
Addressing
Interpersonal Violence
Supports
for Agricultural Producers
Public
Documents Related to Indigenous Experiences
COMMITTEE
OF THE WHOLE ON BILLS
Bill
No. 34 — The Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act
Bill
No. 34 — The Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act
PRESENTING
REPORTS BY STANDING AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES
Standing
Committee on Human Services
Bill
No. 28 — The Public Libraries Amendment Act, 2025
PRESENTING
REPORTS BY STANDING AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES
Standing
Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs and Justice
Bill
No. 26 — The Miscellaneous Statutes Repeal Act, 2025
PRESENTING
REPORTS BY STANDING AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES
Standing
Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs and Justice
Bill
No. 27 — The Statute Law Amendment Act, 2025/Loi de 2025 modifiant le
droit législatif
TABLING
OF ESTIMATES AND SUPPLEMENTARY ESTIMATES
Government’s
Record on Economic Growth
PRIVATE
MEMBERS’ PUBLIC BILLS AND ORDERS

SECOND
SESSION — THIRTIETH LEGISLATURE
of
the
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
DEBATES
AND PROCEEDINGS
(HANSARD)
N.S. Vol. 67 No. 20A Thursday,
November 27, 2025, 10:00
[Prayers]
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Trade and Export.
Hon. Warren Kaeding: — Mr. Speaker, I ask leave for an
extended introduction.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister has requested leave for
an extended introduction. Is leave granted?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Hon. Warren Kaeding: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It is my honour
to rise today to recognize His Excellency Shri Dinesh Kumar Patnaik, the High
Commissioner of India to Canada, seated in your gallery.
His
Excellency was appointed in August of 2025 after previously serving as
ambassador of India to Spain and Andorra. He has a long career of diplomatic
service in the Indian Foreign Service for over 35 years. His postings abroad
included the Deputy High Commissioner of India to London, United Kingdom;
India’s ambassador to the Kingdom of Morocco; India’s ambassador to Cambodia;
and Deputy Chief of Mission at the Indian Embassy in Vienna, Austria. He’s also
served in Indian missions in Geneva, Switzerland; Dhaka, Bangladesh; and
Beijing, China.
This
is the first time that His Excellency has visited Saskatchewan, and I know was
very warmly welcomed by our Agribition community last
night. His Excellency has also travelled with his wife to Saskatchewan, Poonam
Patnaik — although she’s not in the gallery with us today — and she has a long
career of service including a particular focus on mentoring girls and young
women who want to seek careers in education.
I
look forward to our meetings today to discuss the ongoing collaboration between
India and Saskatchewan, and we value our strong relationship. And we appreciate
the High Commissioner and his wife for taking the time to visit our great
province. We have a very long and valued relationship due to the great work
done by His Excellency and those that have preceded him.
So
on behalf of the Government of Saskatchewan, all members of the Assembly, I ask
the House to join me in extending a warm Saskatchewan welcome to His Excellency Patnaik, and wishing him every success
as he continues to strengthen the bonds between India and Saskatchewan.
Mr.
Speaker, as part of my introduction I would also like to introduce Victor
Thomas, who has served as president and chief executive officer of the
Canada-India Business Council since April 1st of 2020. Victor holds many roles
including being a national executive member for the Governor General’s Canadian
Leadership Conference, Pacific NorthWest Economic
Region — North American Advisory Council, and Canada’s Energy for a Secure
Future. We thank Victor for the great work that he has done and continues to do
for our province, especially in extending our India-Saskatchewan relationships.
On
behalf of the Government of Saskatchewan and all members of the Assembly, I ask
the House to join me in welcoming Victor to his Legislative Assembly.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Saskatoon Riversdale.
Kim Breckner: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On behalf of
the official opposition, I would like to echo the comments of my colleague, the
Minister of Trade and Export Development, in welcoming the High Commissioner
and Victor Thomas to the Legislative Assembly today.
We’re
very glad to see that our Prime Minister is taking steps to re-establish trade
with India. It’s very important to our producers here in Saskatchewan that we
work towards removing those tariffs on our commodities.
And
so again, I welcome these two people to the legislature, and thank them for
their work. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Advanced Education.
Hon. Ken Cheveldayoff: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
Colleagues, I’d ask for an extended introduction.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister has requested leave for
an extended introduction. Is leave granted?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Hon. Ken Cheveldayoff: — Well thank you very much. It is indeed
a pleasure this morning, Mr. Speaker and colleagues, to welcome a true Canadian
statesman seated behind the bar. If you go to his Facebook page you’ll see that
he’s a Christian, a husband, a father, an Alberta politico and farmer, the
former MP [Member of Parliament] for the Battle River-Crowfoot constituency,
and a proud Conservative. Colleagues, please help me welcome Damien C. Kurek to
the Saskatchewan Legislative Assembly.
Damien
is no stranger to this building. He’s a former employee on the government side.
He was in my office for many years and helped in former ministerial
responsibilities, and certainly is somebody that is no stranger to elections
and campaigning and door knocking in Saskatoon Willowgrove
and all of that. He is an exemplary person, always putting his family first:
his wife, Danielle, his three sons Matthew, Emerson, and Winston.
And
as politicians we know he is one of the most selfless people that we can point
to as an example of a politician. He was re-elected in the last federal
election. He resigned his seat for the betterment of his party and his country,
and certainly continues to serve in any way that he can. He’s now a principal
with the Upstream Strategy Group.
Mr.
Speaker and colleagues, please welcome Damien C. Kurek back to the building
that he used to work in. Thank you.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Saskatoon University-Sutherland.
Tajinder Grewal: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I join the
Minister of Trade and Export and the member from Saskatoon Riversdale to
welcome His Excellency Dinesh Kumar Patnaik-ji and Victor Thomas, president and
CEO [chief executive officer] of the Canada-India Business Council.
Saskatchewan
and India have a very good relationship, and we can always do better. And I ask
all the members to join me to welcome His Excellency and Mr. Thomas.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Terry Jenson: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To you and
through you this morning, seated in the west gallery are 16 students from Hague
High School. They’ve made the trip down to Regina this morning. They battled
the fog but they made it in time for proceedings today, and I’d like to welcome
them to their Assembly.
They’re
accompanied this morning by their teacher Rebecca Loroff.
And I should mention these students are the tourism class, the grade 11 tourism
class. After proceedings today we’re going to, you know, get together for a
photo, maybe answer some questions. And then the group are going to be off to
the west side of the city. They’re going to go visit the RCMP [Royal Canadian
Mounted Police] Depot, Mr. Speaker.
You
know what, this is a great opportunity to be in the building today to watch
what we do here at work. And it’s part of our commitment to making sure we’re
giving students their best start, Mr. Speaker.
So
with that, I’d like everybody to join me in welcoming the grade 11 tourism
class from Hague High School.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Keith Jorgenson: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s my
pleasure today to introduce Pat Jackson. She’s sitting in your gallery. She is
the mayor of Kipling. I had a great chance to visit Kipling this summer and
chat with her. She’s a passionate advocate for her community, the Southeast,
and health care. And I would encourage everyone to welcome her to her
legislature.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Agriculture.
Hon. Daryl
Harrison: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to join the member
opposite, so to you and through you, I’d like to welcome the mayor of Kipling,
Saskatchewan. Very glad to know Pat. You know, we’ve become fairly close
friends I’m going to say, Pat, so thank you for that friendship. And I’d like
all members to welcome her to her Legislative Assembly.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Wascana Plains.
Brent Blakley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to, in
the east gallery, introduce a few guests from Big Brothers Big Sisters
throughout the province. From Regina and area we have Dominika Krzeminska. I practised pronouncing that earlier. She is
the executive director here in Regina and area. And we have Theresa Mura who is
the mentoring coordinator in Regina and area. And we have with us from Yorkton
and area, the executive director of Big Brothers Big Sisters, Irma Van De
Bon-Nicol with us as well.
These
folks and their organizations do outstanding work for the youth in our
province, in Saskatchewan. And please join me in welcoming them to their
legislature.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Social Services.
Hon. Terry Jenson: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And I would
like to join with the member opposite in welcoming these individuals from Big
Brothers Big Sisters.
This
group, you know, this organization plays such an important role with our youth
throughout the province, Mr. Speaker. And I’ve had the opportunity to speak
with some of the different Big Brothers Big Sisters organizations, the
different chapters around Saskatchewan. And I look forward to meeting with
these people maybe later today, and if not later today, we’ll schedule
something for the next couple of weeks. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Northeast.
Jacqueline Roy: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to
welcome, in your gallery, Joan McDonald to this Chamber. To me, she’s the
mother of my university friend Leah. Nine years ago, Joan lost her daughter and
Leah lost her twin sister to domestic violence. Joan is here today so that no
other mother has to stand in this House and hear about a daughter who didn’t
make it. And Leah hopes to visit this Chamber in the future. When she does, I’m
determined that things will have changed to help people like her twin sister.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Saskatoon Southeast.
Brittney Senger: — Thank you,
Mr. Speaker. I would like to request leave for an extended introduction.
Speaker Goudy: — The member
has requested leave for an extended introduction. Is leave granted?
Some Hon.
Members: — Agreed.
Brittney Senger: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to
echo what my colleague has said and recognize Joan McDonald, who is here with
us today.
Joan
is a fierce advocate and truly an inspiration. She took something
heartbreaking, the loss of her daughter Abbie, and used it to make change. She
has advocated to implement the recommendations in the domestic violence death
review. She has advocated for change around employers and employees recognizing
the signs of domestic violence and knowing where to ask for help.
Joan
is an inspiration to me. She is somebody that I strive to be. And her and I had
the privilege of working on a petition that I will be presenting later today.
Truly I am grateful for everything that Joan has done to make change. And I
would like to ask all members of the Assembly to thank Joan for her remarkable
work and welcome her to her Legislative Assembly.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Rochdale.
Joan Pratchler: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I too would
like to recognize a constituent from Regina Rochdale. Saskatchewan Hollywood
elite, if I can say so. It’s Lucas Frison and his dad.
Lucas
is a filmmaker, a scriptwriter, a director, and he’s done documentary work for
Telefilm Canada, CBC [Canadian Broadcasting Corporation], AMI [Accessible Media
Inc.] and many more, and he now has another production in the works. And I’ll
speak a little bit more about Lucas in my member’s statement. So I invite
everyone in the House to welcome Lucas and his dad to their legislature.
Speaker Goudy: — Well we just lost the two fellows I
was wanting to introduce. They’re out in the hallway. But the High Commissioner
from India was here today. Just wanted to say a few words about he and the
fellow that was with him.
High
Commissioner Shri Dinesh, he . . . Pretty exciting to have diplomats
from India here with that kind of perspective. It’s exciting to see when people
have the best interest of their nation and your nation in mind when they’re
serving as your High Commissioner, and that was what I saw this morning.
[10:15]
You know, when you look at that fellow,
Victor Thomas, what he has been for Saskatchewan. He has brought the rest of
the world to this province. And though he may not live here now, he sticks out
his chest, and he’s very proud of this province. His parents live here. And he
serves us exceptionally well as a province. And I just wanted — wish he was
here — but wanted to thank him for his great service to the province of
Saskatchewan. So they’re gone, but let’s . . . We’ll send them the
clip, says the Minister of Rural and Remote Health. Thank you very much.
All right. Who else? Minister of
Government Relations.
Hon. Eric
Schmalz: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And a late addition to the introductions today. I
wanted to rise in the House and introduce some good friends and constituents of
mine in Saskatchewan Rivers, Virgil and Carly Brons and their two children,
here today with us.
Mr. Speaker, they are ranchers. They
raise arguably the cutest calves in history, and those would be the Scottish
Highland breed of calves. Very popular in the plush toy world right now, Mr.
Speaker. Also I want to say, point out that their son Mason has been accepted
to the U of S [University of Saskatchewan] and will be studying political
science coming up.
So I would ask all members to welcome
these wonderful people to their legislature.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Northeast.
Jacqueline Roy: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise to present a petition to the Legislative
Assembly of Saskatchewan to implement rent control.
The undersigned residents wish you to
know that Saskatchewan tenants are currently experiencing the highest level of
rent increases in the country, and that with rent control, residents can budget
more effectively and contribute to a growing economy. Provinces such as BC
[British Columbia], Manitoba, Ontario, and PEI [Prince Edward Island] have
already implemented rent control measures and protect tenants.
The undersigned . . . I will
read the prayer before that:
Call on the
Government of Saskatchewan to adopt a fair and effective rent control
legislation that limits annual rent increases, ensures housing stability, and
protects tenants from being priced out of homes.
The undersigned residents are from
Regina and Saskatoon, Mr. Speaker. I do so present.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Cumberland.
Jordan McPhail: —
Well thank you, Mr. Speaker. Today I rise on a fairly important petition,
especially this week. You know, over the course of the summer we got to see the
Premier up in Ile-a-la-Crosse and talking about the residential schools in
northern Saskatchewan that were phased . . . And hearing some of the
reports here this last week on the Truth and Reconciliation’s Calls to Action,
missing and murdered women and girls and the stance the government has taken on
that.
I think it’s extremely important to rise
on this petition here today to call on the Government of Saskatchewan to
recognize the Timber Bay residential school as a provincially run residential
school, release the school records, and the formal apology and compensation to
the survivors.
The undersigned residents wish to bring
to the attention the following: that survivors of the Timber Bay residential
school have been denied the Indian residential school settlements that other
sites received on the basis that the school was run by the province of
Saskatchewan rather than operated by the federal government; the province of
Saskatchewan oversaw approximately 2,000 children attend the school in Timber
Bay which operated between 1952 and 1994; Timber Bay residential school is the
only residential school in Canada with an open RCMP investigation surrounding
historical claims.
I’ll read the prayer:
We, in the prayer
that reads as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan call on the Government of Saskatchewan to recognize the Timber Bay
school as a provincially run residential school, release the school records to the
survivors, offer the students of this school a formal apology, and compensate
the survivors.
The signatories of this petition, Mr.
Speaker, live in Air Ronge and La Ronge. I do so present.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Southeast.
Brittney
Senger: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise to present a petition to the Legislative
Assembly of Saskatchewan calling for mandatory intimate partner violence
education.
The 500 undersigned residents of the
province of Saskatchewan wish to bring to your attention the following:
Saskatchewan has the highest rates of interpersonal violence in all of Canada;
the economic impact of IPV [intimate partner violence] in Canada is estimated
at $7 billion per year; annual estimated losses to employers are estimated
at $77 million in Canada; workplace orientation would include all genders
from all walks of life and all areas of the province.
We, in the prayer
that reads as follows, respectfully request the Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan call on the Government of Saskatchewan to immediately mandate
education on intimate partner violence be included in all orientation processes
for all new employees in all workplaces in Saskatchewan.
The undersigned residents reside in
every corner of Saskatchewan including Moose Jaw, Bruno, Humboldt, The
Battlefords, Outlook, Dalmeny, Warman, Rosetown,
Martensville, Kyle, Clavet, Sturgis, Langham, Canora, Prince Albert, Yorkton,
Weldon, and Dundurn, just to name a few. I do so present.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Douglas Park.
Nicole Sarauer: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today to present a petition calling on the
government to reverse the ban on third-party educators from publicly funded
schools.
Those who have signed this petition wish
to bring to our attention the following: that on August 22nd, 2023, the
Saskatchewan government banned all third-party educators from publicly funded
schools. Those who were banned include organizations like the Regina Sexual
Assault Centre, the North East Outreach and Support Services, Partners Family
Services, and the various YWCAs across the province. The topics that these
organizations teach include consent, healthy relationships, and child sexual
abuse prevention.
Mr. Speaker, the government’s own
domestic violence death review reports from 2018 and 2025 have both highlighted
the importance of prevention education for youth. And, Mr. Speaker, the
decision to ban these educators will make Saskatchewan’s rates of intimate
partner violence, sexual violence, and sexual abuse worse, not better.
I’d like to read the prayer:
We, in the prayer
that reads as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan call on the Government of Saskatchewan to immediately reverse the
decision to ban third-party educators in Saskatchewan schools and consult with
experts in developing a comprehensive curriculum for all Saskatchewan students.
Those who have signed the petition today
come from Saskatoon. I do so present.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina . . .
University-Sutherland.
Tajinder Grewal: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise to present the petition to permit the use of
tax-reduced dyed diesel in refrigerated trucks immediately.
The undersigned residents wish to bring
to your attention the following: that the price of food rose almost 4 per cent
last year as the province continued to tax food refrigeration units on truck
trailers; that each refrigeration unit on a truck costs an extra $24,000 to
fuel each year with the 12‑cents-per-litre road tax continuing to be
charged on them; that other industries in the province, including agriculture
and forestry, are eligible to use dyed diesel on equipment that doesn’t touch
the highway, but the trucking industry is not; that the Government of
Saskatchewan has refused to allow refrigerated trucks to use dyed diesel fuel.
With that, Mr. Speaker, I will read the
prayer:
We respectfully
request that the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan call on the Government of
Saskatchewan to immediately permit refrigerated trucks in Saskatchewan to use
dyed diesel fuel.
The petition has been signed by
residents of Saskatoon. I do so present. Thank you.
Speaker Goudy:
— I recognize the member from Regina Rochdale.
Joan Pratchler: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. With us today in the gallery, as I mentioned before, is
an outstanding constituent from Regina Rochdale, Lucas Frison.
Lucas grew up in Strasbourg and is a
graduate of the University of Regina with a B.F.A. [Bachelor of Fine Arts] in
film production, and after finishing film school, he founded Prairie Cat
Productions. And in the following years he wrote, directed, produced, scripted,
and did documentary work for Telefilm Canada, CBC, AMI, and many more. You may
well know him from his 2019 documentary Humboldt: The New Season. It was
nominated for the best documentary program in 2020 at the Canadian Screen
Awards. Most recently he directed a documentary series, We Were Broncos,
and the feature film One Perfect Date.
We Were Broncos
follows the Humboldt Broncos bus crash survivor Ryan Straschnitzki
as he pursues the Paralympics. The Broncos are a subject close to Lucas as he
lost his best friend in the crash, assistant coach Mark Cross. I was most
honoured to be invited to attend that premiere this past summer, and it’s even
more touching since I grew up and still have very close ties to the Humboldt
community back home. Lucas’s most recent feature film, One Perfect Date,
is a comedy and it follows a young woman with Down syndrome.
Please join with me to recognize and
celebrate the depth and passion of this artist, Lucas Frison.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Canora-Pelly.
Sean
Wilson:
— Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today to
recognize the Norquay Knights senior girls’
basketball team and their coaches Stacy Rubletz, Jen
Lindgren, and Meghan Lord for their incredible Buckets for Brain Cancer
fundraiser, held February 14th and 15th of this year.
The team organized this event to support
their teammate and friend Cheyenne Peterson, who was bravely battling DIPG
[diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma]. With great sadness, Cheyenne passed away on
March 12th, but her courage inspired the entire region.
The fundraiser brought together the
communities of Norquay and Sturgis, beginning with a
lasagna supper and the pink game, where fans dressed in pink to paint the
province pink. The next morning, Norquay’s volunteer
firefighters hosted a pancake breakfast, showing true community spirit. Through
these efforts, the team raised $3,000 for the Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital
Foundation. I’m also proud to note that they were recently nominated for the
national youth philanthropist award.
Mr. Speaker, I ask all members to join
me in congratulating the Norquay Knights in honouring
Cheyenne’s memory.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Regina Wascana Plains.
Brent Blakley: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Big Brothers Big Sisters of Regina and Area has been a
pillar of youth empowerment and community support since 1971. Big Brothers Big
Sisters operate agencies throughout Saskatchewan, including Yorkton and area.
The organization is dedicated to
enabling life-changing mentoring relationships that fuels the potential of
young people. Through its various one-to-one and group mentoring programs, Big
Brothers Big Sisters connects children and youth facing adversity with caring
adult volunteers who provide guidance, friendship, and encouragement. These
relationships help build confidence and a sense of belonging to young people,
giving them the tools they need to succeed in school, establish positive
relationships, and make healthy life choices.
Programs such as in-school mentoring,
big group activities, and traditional community-based matches meet the unique
needs of each young person, ensuring a lasting impact. The organization also
collaborates with schools, families, and community partners to address
challenges and create supportive environments for youth.
In Regina, executive director Dominika Krzeminska, director of development and communications Amy
Mohr, and mentoring coordinator Theresa Mura, along with the staff and
volunteers, work tirelessly to foster connections that strengthen the entire
community.
Big Brothers Big Sisters organizations
in Regina, Yorkton, and throughout Saskatchewan continue to promote the belief
that every child has incredible potential, potential to grow into confident,
compassionate leaders.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the
Ag minister, our MLA [Member of the Legislative Assembly] from Cannington.
Hon. Daryl Harrison: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to take a moment to recognize my constituent
Jill Lowe, a 25‑year member of the Moose Mountain Pro Rodeo committee in
Kennedy, Saskatchewan.
Jill’s roots run deep in the Kennedy
area, and her great-grandfather was a founding member of the Moose Mountain Pro
Rodeo way back in 1933. Jill has served as the committee’s president since 2019
and was recently recognized for her years of hard work and dedication as the
Committee Member of the Year in the Canadian Professional Rodeo Association.
Jill says her role on the committee is a lot of work, but she wouldn’t do it if
she didn’t love it.
You can’t put an event on like this
without an exceptional team of volunteers, and the team that puts on the Moose
Mountain Pro Rodeo is small but mighty. Jill was nominated by her peers on the
committee for the award, and although she won it herself, she accepted it on
behalf of the entire organization.
The little community of Kennedy grows
from 200 people to 1,500 people on rodeo weekend, putting on an incredible show
sanctioned by the Canadian Professional Rodeo Association, one of the only
professional rodeos here in the province. I encourage all members to check out
the rodeo next summer and join me in congratulating Jill on this
accomplishment. Thank you.
[10:30]
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Regina Northeast.
Jacqueline Roy: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On April 20th, 2017 in Yellow Grass, Abbie Speir had
her life taken in a brutal way. I will spare the Chamber the details, but her
family lives with them every day.
When I was talking with her twin sister,
Leah, this week, she said:
There was so much
we didn’t know that might have changed the outcome. I didn’t know how prevalent
domestic abuse was. I didn’t know that leaving and going back were common. I
didn’t know it was unlikely to have been the first incident when she finally told
us what was happening. I didn’t know that leaving was the most dangerous time.
Abbie died days before her family’s plan
to help her escape.
Late last night while finishing this
statement, I realized something horribly uncomfortable myself. After 17 years
or more as an educator, Mr. Speaker, I didn’t know the signs. There’s lots of
lives I could have turned around. It seems very obvious to me in retrospect
when I look at some of the conversations I had with people over the years, some
of those signs.
If we can require training on how to
handle bleach, we can require training on how to save victims’ lives. It’s
simple. It’s practical. It doesn’t cost much, and the government has already
developed and used it with its own employees. Mr. Speaker, I will remind this
House that it is our solemn duty as legislators to minimize harm, and if we
don’t do more to educate kids in classrooms or educate adults at work, history
will not look kindly upon us.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Dakota-Arm River.
Barret Kropf: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today to honour a remarkable pioneer of Canadian
health care whose vision began over 110 years ago in the small village of
Holdfast, Saskatchewan. In July 1914 Dr. Henry Joseph Schmitt arrived in the
rural municipality of Sarnia. Faced with families unable to pay medical bills
during tough prairie years, Dr. Schmitt proposed a bold idea. The municipality
would retain his services through tax dollars, providing care to all residents
with no additional fees.
In 1915 the RM [rural municipality]
agreed to pay Dr. Schmitt an annual salary of $1,800, making Holdfast the very
first community in North America to hire and fund a doctor this way. This was
the birth of the municipal doctor system, the direct forerunner of
Saskatchewan’s universal health care.
He was there at the outset of the
Spanish flu and would take the horse and cutter and check on farms in the area.
Whatever farm he ended up at night was where he stayed. It was amazing that he
never got the flu himself.
Mr. Speaker, it is fitting that Dr.
Schmitt’s grandson Fred Bradshaw, who served as MLA in this very Chamber,
carried on that same spirit of public service as the member for Carrot River
Valley from 2007 until 2024. The Schmitt-Bradshaw family reminds us that real
change often starts in our smallest communities with the courage of one person
who believes health care is a right, not a privilege.
Today let us thank Dr. Henry Joseph
Schmitt for showing the world that medicare could
work and that Saskatchewan could lead the way. To his grandson, MLA Bradshaw,
thank you for your years of service to this province. And to the town of
Holdfast, thank you for your leadership in health care over a century ago.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the
Environment minister, the member from Last Mountain-Touchwood.
Hon. Travis Keisig: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Like a bull in the arena, the Canadian Western Agribition launched with full energy right here in the
Queen City. Agribition attracts thousands from around
the globe each year, showcasing Saskatchewan’s world-class agricultural sector.
Speaking of energy, Mr. Speaker, last
night in this very building, there was a lot of exciting energy going on. Our
Premier hosted the annual Canadian Western Agribition
Premier’s reception, providing a meaningful opportunity for us to connect with
producers, stakeholders, and special guests from Canada and around the globe.
The building was buzzing with excitement about cattle prices, the long-time
exhibitor awards, and our great trade relations.
And speaking of great trade relations,
Mr. Speaker, you will never guess who dropped in at the reception last night —
the High Commissioner of India to Canada, Mr. Dinesh Patnaik, who is also
joining us here today. Our efforts to promote trade and expand this province’s
reach internationally are succeeding, which is primarily due to the work of our
Premier and this government, Mr. Speaker. There is no better place to see this
momentum than during Canadian Western Agribition,
where the chute opens, Mr. Speaker, where our world-class producers, ranchers,
and businesses all step into that arena and showcase their world-class talent. Thank you
very much, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the Deputy Leader of the
Opposition.
Vicki Mowat: — Mr. Speaker, the Sask
Party government hammers families with taxes every single day. They hiked taxes
on groceries. They hiked taxes on kids’ clothes. They even hiked taxes on
tires, Mr. Speaker.
Now
we find out they’re also behind the massive property taxes coming to Regina and
Saskatoon. The city of Saskatoon produced a report that makes it clear. The Sask Party has dumped responsibility for housing and
homelessness onto municipal government. Now as a result, property taxes are due
to rise more than 12 per cent over two years.
Can
the Premier explain to homeowners why he’s making them shoulder the burden for
his horrible financial mismanagement?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Government Relations.
Hon. Eric Schmalz: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It is this
government who implemented a comprehensive municipal revenue-sharing program in
this province unique to this country, Mr. Speaker. No other province and
jurisdiction of Canada has that municipal revenue sharing, Mr. Speaker:
$362 million provided to municipalities over the last year,
$66 million going to the city of Saskatoon, 55 million going to the
city of Regina.
Mr.
Speaker, we will continue to work with and support our municipalities,
including lobbying trips to Ottawa with the mayors of the seven largest urban
centres; SARM [Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities] and SUMA
[Saskatchewan Urban Municipalities Association] along with us . . .
[Interjections]
Speaker Goudy: — It’s a poor start. How about we
listen a little more careful to the answers?
Sorry.
Minister of Government Relations.
Hon. Eric Schmalz: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. SARM and SUMA
along with us, Mr. Speaker, in an effort to secure further integrated bilateral
agreements with our municipal partners to support municipalities in
Saskatchewan, Mr. Speaker. We will continue that work every day, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you very much.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Deputy Leader of the Opposition.
Vicki Mowat: — So out of touch with everyday people,
Mr. Speaker. Four in ten, four in ten people are borrowing money or draining
their savings just to put food on the table. We have record food bank use,
higher financial anxiety than anywhere else in Canada, and what does the Sask Party do here in Regina? They try to pick up Costco
and move it to their failed GTH [Global
Transportation Hub], a horrible decision that cost Regina taxpayers
$7 million.
Now
taxes in Regina could rise 15 per cent. Can the Premier explain why he clearly
cares more about propping up the failed GTH than
cutting families a break on their taxes?
Speaker Goudy: — Again I’m
going to ask both sides when their time comes to talk about the intention and
be careful in your questions please.
I recognize the Minister of Government Relations.
Hon. Eric Schmalz: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Again this
government is doing more for municipalities than any other jurisdiction in
Canada, Mr. Speaker. You don’t need to ask us. You can ask the Federation of
Canadian Municipalities who said Saskatchewan was on the right track when it
comes to supporting municipalities.
Mr.
Speaker, we will continue to work with our municipalities in this province,
supporting their infrastructure needs wherever and whenever we can alongside
our federal partners, alongside our municipal partners, Mr. Speaker. We stand
with Saskatchewan municipalities every single day.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Deputy Leader of the Opposition.
Vicki Mowat: — Mr. Speaker, yesterday we asked about
mounting losses at SaskPower. The Sask Party has
blown a nearly quarter-billion-dollar hole in what they projected, and the year
is only half gone. There’s only one place to turn to cover these losses, and
it’s the ratepayers.
Will
the Premier tell the people of Saskatchewan exactly how high he will hike their
SaskPower bills?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of CIC [Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan].
Hon. Jeremy Harrison: — Well thank you, colleagues. Let’s be
very clear what the NDP [New Democratic Party] just asked, Mr. Speaker. They
are demanding that the industrial carbon tax be put back on to SaskPower bills.
That is what the NDP have been demanding since we took the industrial carbon
tax off of SaskPower bills, Mr. Speaker.
In
fact the only thing that they’ve actually had to say about power, Mr. Speaker,
is that they are going to shut down 1500 megawatts of our existing facilities
right now, adding tens of billions of dollars of capital costs and doubling or
tripling SaskPower bills, Mr. Speaker.
That’s
their plan. Our plan is to take and keep that industrial carbon tax off
SaskPower bills, keeping our power system reliable and affordable into the
future.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Keith Jorgenson: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This
tax-and-spend Sask Party government is failing the
families of Saskatchewan with the cost of living, but they’re failing to
deliver health care in rural Saskatchewan too, Mr. Speaker.
Today
we’re joined by Pat Jackson, the mayor of Kipling. She’s here to advocate for
her hospital in her community. Last night the ER [emergency room] was closed
again due to short-staffing.
What
does the minister say to the people of Kipling who can’t trust that their
hospital will be open for them when they need the care they need?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Remote and Rural Health.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And I do thank
the member opposite for the question because stabilizing and strengthening our
health care services in rural and remote areas of the province is a priority
for this government.
And
I want to truly thank Pat for being with us here today. She is a strong
advocate for her community, and I truly appreciate her for the way she works
collaboratively with both sides of the House on trying to find solutions.
And
one of those solutions, Mr. Speaker, that we just announced is point-of-care
testing is going to be coming to Kipling. Staff is being trained as we speak.
Hopefully it’s up and running in early December. And that will truly help and
alleviate some of these short-term disruptions that are taking place in her
community.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Keith Jorgenson: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. You know, last
night was not an isolated incident. The Kipling hospital was closed on November
3rd, from the 7th to the 12th, then again on the 19th, the 20th, the 25th.
That’s nine days in November and 50 days so far this year, Mr. Speaker.
This
Sask Party government has been in power for 18 years.
Why did they let things get so bad in Kipling?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Remote and Rural Health.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And once again
I’d like to thank Pat for coming here. I had an opportunity to speak with her
last week at length. We had a great conversation.
During
that conversation I had the opportunity to highlight the things that we are
doing for rural communities, and specifically for Kipling, through some
administration savings that we found earlier this year right across the
province. In 30 communities we were able to have 77 new and enhanced clinical
roles, two of which went to Kipling, Mr. Speaker.
We
have been able to fully staff their doctor complement through the SIPPA [Saskatchewan international physician practice
assessment] program. So that is one more thing that Kipling has, and we’re so
happy to be able to have those there. And with the point-of-care testing it
will help augment that so that short-term disruptions do not happen in the
future, Mr. Speaker.
So
thank you to Pat for coming, and we’ll continue to work with not only her
community but all rural communities across Saskatchewan, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Keith Jorgenson: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. You know, the
people of Kipling are seeing the effects of these closures on their health and
the people in the community, but they’re also seeing the effects of these
closures on local businesses.
My
office has reached out to many of the small businesses in Kipling, and almost
universally they’ve told my office that they’re seeing a decrease in customers
and also they’re having difficulty securing investment in Kipling due to the
uncertainty of the hospital being open.
Does
the minister understand the damage that she is doing not only to health care
and people’s health, but also how this affecting local businesses? And will the
minister agree to meet with Pat today after question period?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Remote and Rural Health.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And Pat already
knows I have an open door. And any time she wants to meet with me, I will meet
with her.
As
for the conversation that we had last week — as for several conversations we’ve
had over several different ministries that I’ve had the opportunity to work in,
Mr. Speaker — her collaboration and the way we work with the community of
Kipling, I’m actually quite proud of that. And that’s why we’re continuing to
do the work that we’re doing around ensuring that there’s doctors, ensuring
that care comes to the front line; you know, getting rid of some of those
administrative positions across the province to be able to do that, Mr.
Speaker.
The
point-of-care testing that I talked about . . . I understand that
home care services in their community, there are no longer wait-lists because
we’ve been able to staff up in that area as well, Mr. Speaker. We have
registered nurse APPs, authorized practice nurses,
within that community now. There are additional services that they have there
as well, Mr. Speaker, and we will continue to work with rural Saskatchewan.
Thank you.
[10:45]
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Rochdale.
Joan Pratchler: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Well, well,
well. I go to Ottawa for just three days and I come home and we’ve got a child
care agreement announcement. Who knew? There we go. I rise today on behalf of
those families and the child care providers who have been ignored for so, so
long . . . [inaudible interjection] . . . I’ll wait.
Child
care makes life more affordable, and it’s good for the economy. Yet this
government dragged its heels, and now we’re going to be the second-last
province to sign on to the deal with the federal government. There was so much
anxiety and worry for the families. Centres, centres have nearly closed. And we
desperately need more child care spaces, and we got child care deserts
everywhere.
[Interjections]
Speaker Goudy: — Sorry. The government, it’s not
listening very well to questions here.
The
member from Regina Rochdale.
Joan Pratchler: — Will the minister stand and apologize
for all he’s put these families through?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Education.
Hon. Everett Hindley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I will not
stand and apologize for negotiating a better deal on behalf of every single
family in this province, Mr. Speaker.
Those
members opposite, and that member for Regina Rochdale has the gall to stand in
the House today to take credit for this deal, Mr. Speaker, the hard work being
done by the ministry, the assistant deputy minister and her team on this file
working on behalf of this government and on behalf of families and child care
operators in this province to make sure that not only do we get a better deal
for child care in this province, but a long-term, sustainable deal that is the
best deal for families, for the sector, Mr. Speaker.
The
only apology that should be given in this House today to the people of this
province, Mr. Speaker, is from that member opposite who ran around the province
for months and months and months creating uncertainty in the child care sector.
She knows better than that, Mr. Speaker, and she should apologize.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Rochdale.
Joan Pratchler: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Well that
wasn’t very nice, was it? Saskatchewan ranks dead last in affordable child care
spaces. In fact we’ve been last for the last four years. Oh wait, who’s been in
government?
And
as one provider joining us in the legislature said to me yesterday on the
plane, any signatures now don’t make up for the last number of months of chaos
child care operators have had to endure. And we still don’t have clarity.
Can
the Premier explain why his government has driven affordable child care in
Saskatchewan to last place in all of Canada?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Education.
Hon. Everett Hindley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Great to
finally get some questions this session finally on child care. It’s been a bit
of a desert when it comes to questions from that member opposite, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, here’s the deal. As I’ve said multiple times and . . . Lots
of chatter from members opposite. Mr. Speaker, as we’ve said for months now, we
have been willing and ready to negotiate a child care deal on behalf of the
families of this province, Mr. Speaker. And that is what we’ve been waiting to
do and reached out to the minister back in May after her appointment.
Mr.
Speaker, it wasn’t until the 16th of October when we got a letter from the
minister federally saying that she was now instructing her officials to begin
negotiations with our government. And so that’s when negotiations began and
occurred in a very robust fashion, Mr. Speaker, to ensure that we get the deal.
Mr.
Speaker, we’re not going to do what the members opposite were suggesting the
entire time, which is to simply . . . [inaudible interjection]
. . . They’re right, Mr. Speaker, actually . . .
[Interjections]
Speaker Goudy: — Yeah, it’s time. But I was standing
up to say that the member from Cumberland needs to listen a little more careful
to the answers to the questions. Next question, please.
I
recognize the member from Regina Douglas Park.
Nicole Sarauer: — Mr. Speaker, Saskatchewan has the
highest rates of intimate partner violence amongst provinces in the country,
more than double the national average.
To
the Minister of Labour: will this government consider mandatory workplace
education to address our worst-in-the-nation rates of intimate partner
violence?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of the Status of Women.
Hon. Alana Ross: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And I would
like to express my sincere condolences to Joan and her family. I know what
you’ve been through is absolutely heartbreaking, and I express my condolences
on behalf of our government.
And,
Mr. Speaker, violence of any form is unacceptable in our workplaces, in our
homes, anywhere in our province. And employers have an obligation to ensure the
health and safety and well-being of their workers. As of May 17th, all
workplaces are required to have a violence policy and a prevention plan in
place to ensure the safety of their workers.
Our
government has put in place interpersonal violence leave for survivors of
interpersonal violence or sexual violence to access supports or relocate homes.
However there’s more work to be done. There is a bill that we, as we speak
. . .
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Douglas Park.
Nicole Sarauer: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Kind words from
that minister, but very little action. The actions presented were provisions
that we’ve been pushing government to implement. And that question was to the
Minister of Labour, Mr. Speaker.
Let’s
take the province’s own Domestic Violence Death Review Report as an
example of this government’s inaction. The second report came out almost a year
ago now with many of the same recommendations as the first.
From
the 2018 report, Mr. Speaker: “Develop a comprehensive program that focuses on
building education and awareness about healthy relationships and how to prevent
and respond to situations of domestic violence and abuse.”
Now
from the 2025 report, Mr. Speaker: “Develop youth-focused educational programs
on healthy relationships.”
To
the Minister of Education: why has the Sask Party
failed to do these and actually taken us backward by removing healthy
relationship education from our schools?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of the Status of Women.
Hon. Alana Ross: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’ve spoke many
times in this House as to many programs and actions that we’ve put into place.
However there’s still more work to be done when protecting victims of
gender-based violence and interpersonal violence, and we recognize that.
There
is a bill before this Assembly as we speak that can be passed through all
stages today. Immediately following question period, the government will be
requesting leave to move Bill No. 34, The Cyberstalking and Coercive
Control Act. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara Conway: — So disappointing to see this government
ignore recommendations that they could put in place today, Mr. Speaker.
Unacceptable, unacceptable.
On
Sunday the Gardens Community Health Centre in Regina is due to shut its doors
for good because, after 18 years of this Sask Party,
they couldn’t find or keep doctors. Now today the Health minister brushes off
questions about this clinic. He wants to distance himself totally from it. But
back in 2018 when it opened, their own press release heralded it as “the future
of primary care,” after which they poured over $20 million into this
clinic.
It
makes no sense that that Health minister can’t tell us a single thing he’s done
to save this clinic. So forget him, Mr. Speaker. To the Premier: does the
Premier know how many Regina residents will lose their family doctor come
Sunday when this clinic closes?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Health.
Hon. Jeremy Cockrill: — Mr. Speaker, I’ve answered this
question multiple times from the member opposite. This is an independently run
clinic that makes decisions to close on their own, Mr. Speaker.
But,
Mr. Speaker, I would highlight — I know the member opposite doesn’t want to
hear this from me but — the availability of new contract nurse practitioners
that we have right here in the city of Regina. Nineteen right across the
province, but five new nurse practitioners accepting at least 800 patients
each, Mr. Speaker. Those five right here practising in the city of Regina.
I
had an opportunity to speak to three of those nurse practitioners a couple of
weeks ago. They are welcoming patients, new patients, in the city of Regina.
And I would recommend that any patient in Regina looking for a primary care
provider seek that out through those nurse practitioners that are now available
right here in the city of Regina.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara Conway: — Mr. Speaker, the evidence on the value
of nurse practitioners has been around since the 1970s.
So, great, but you’re late to the party and it’s not enough.
And
to the Premier, the answer to that question was 5,000. Five thousand people
will find themselves without a family doctor. It’s another step in the wrong
direction, making it totally clear they have no intention of honouring their
election promise that they will find primary care for every Saskatchewan
resident by 2028.
They’ve
known about this closure for months, Mr. Speaker. Why did the Premier and the
Health minister do nothing to find solutions? And again, what are the 5,000
people that will find themselves without access to primary care or a family
doctor, what are they expected to do come Monday?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Health.
Hon. Jeremy Cockrill: — Mr. Speaker, I’m happy to tell
residents of the city of Regina, residents right across this province that
myself, this government, this Premier are absolutely committed to putting
patients first and ensuring that every single person in this province has
access to a primary care provider by 2028. That’s why we’re adding these 19
nurse practitioner positions right across the province. That’s why we’ve added
more family medicine residency seats in rural communities, including Nipawin
and Melfort and Yorkton, Mr. Speaker.
Again,
Mr. Speaker, these are all the things that we’re doing to ensure that we have
more primary care providers to ensure that everybody in this province has
access to primary care by 2028.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Regina Mount Royal.
Trent Wotherspoon: — Mr. Speaker, yesterday very proud
producers from a region in the Southwest that have faced nine years of drought
and counting came to this legislature demanding action. They’re in a dire
situation. But instead of delivering the supports those producers need, that
minister sent an official out to the rotunda to answer on his behalf.
That’s
not accountability. That’s not stepping up. That’s pathetic and weak, Mr.
Speaker. But that’s what the Saskatchewan people have grown to expect
. . .
Speaker Goudy: — I don’t think we can be calling
members pathetic and weak. In that case it was maybe not the response, but it
was towards the individual. So I would ask that you apologize to the member.
Trent Wotherspoon: — I’d withdraw.
That’s
not accountability. That’s not stepping up. But that’s what Saskatchewan people
have grown to expect from that 18‑year-old Sask
Party government.
Why
won’t that Ag minister and that government step up to support this region and
these producers that are in such a dire situation, and make sure they have the
emergency supports that they deserve?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Agriculture.
Hon. Daryl
Harrison: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’ve got to say, the member
opposite goes out to rural Saskatchewan to see the challenges. I go home and
see those challenges myself. I’m very, very in touch with the producers of this
province.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker. This year producers had $12 billion worth of crop
insurance coverage alone. We know this program supports producers. It has paid
out over $7 billion in the last four years. From that amount, almost a
quarter of a billion dollars has gone to the RMs of
Big Stick and Fox Valley and their neighbouring municipalities.
Mr.
Speaker, we are there for our producers, and we will fully fund our business
risk management programs. We are there every step of the way. Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
member from Athabasca.
Leroy Laliberte: — Mr. Speaker, the Sask
Party government has shown severe disrespect for the First Nations and Métis
people in this province. The reports of the National Inquiry into Missing and
Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
detail the abuses and violations of Indigenous people, both historical and
ongoing.
[11:00]
They
are two of the most important documents published in the country. And in the
Court of King’s Bench, the Sask Party government
lawyers called those documents “patently unreliable.” This is an insult to all
Indigenous peoples in Canada.
Will
the Premier apologize for this outrageous statement?
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of First Nations, Métis and Northern Affairs.
Hon. Eric Schmalz: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The comments
from the member clearly demonstrate they don’t understand the question before
the court, Mr. Speaker. It has nothing to do with the content of the documents
or the experiences of the individuals, Mr. Speaker. It is simply focusing on
what public documents meet the established legal criteria on admissibility for
evidence in court, Mr. Speaker.
Moreover,
Mr. Speaker, I’ve got a list here of ways and means in which we are meeting
reconciliation in this province every day, Mr. Speaker. But no more of an
example points to that than the opportunity I had with the Premier this summer,
Mr. Speaker, to attend Ile-a-la-Crosse, where the Premier of this province took
the unprecedented step to apologize and provide compensation to the survivors
and their families of the residential school in that community, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you very much.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Government House Leader.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I ask
leave to move to Government Order no. 7, The Cyberstalking and Coercive
Control Act.
Speaker Goudy: — The member has asked leave to move
to Government Orders no. 7.
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill No. 34 — The Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act be
now read a second time.]
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the Minister of Remote
and Rural Health.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I
move that the question on the second reading of Bill No. 34, The
Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act now be put.
[Interjections]
Speaker Goudy: — Order please. The question before
the Assembly is the motion moved by the Minister of Remote and Rural Health
that Bill No. 34 be now read a second time. Is it the pleasure of the
Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — Carried.
Deputy Clerk: — Second reading of this bill.
Speaker Goudy: — To which committee shall this bill
be committed? I recognize the Minister of Remote and Rural Health.
Hon. Lori Carr: — I designate that Bill No. 34, The
Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act be committed to the Committee of the
Whole on Bills and that the said bill be considered in the Committee of the
Whole on Bills immediately.
Speaker Goudy: — I do now leave the Chair for the
Assembly to go into Committee of the Whole on Bills.
Chair B. McLeod: — I’ll ask for order in the House.
Order in the House.
The
item of business before the committee is Bill No. 34, The Cyberstalking
and Coercive Control Act.
Clause
1, short title, is that agreed?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
[Clause
1 agreed to.]
[Interjections]
Chair B. McLeod: — I’ll ask for order in the House once more, and please keep silent.
[Clauses
2 and 3 agreed to.]
Chair
B. McLeod: — His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent
of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, enacts as follows: Bill
No. 34, The Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act.
I recognize the Government House Leader.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I move that the
committee report the bill without amendment.
Chair
B. McLeod: — It has been moved that the committee report Bill
No. 34 without amendment. Is that agreed?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Chair
B. McLeod: — Carried. I recognize the Government House
Leader.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Mr. Chair, I move that the committee rise, report
progress, and ask for leave to sit again.
Chair B. McLeod: — It has
been moved by the minister that the committee rise, report progress, and ask
for leave to sit again. Is that agreed?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Chair
B. McLeod: — Carried.
[The
Speaker resumed the Chair.]
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the Chair of Committees.
Blaine McLeod: — I am instructed by the committee to
report Bill No. 34, The Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act
without amendment.
Speaker Goudy: — The Minister of Justice may proceed
and move to third reading.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move that
this bill be now read a third time and passed under its title.
Speaker Goudy: — It has been moved that Bill
No. 34, The Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act be now read the
third time and passed under its title. Is the Assembly ready for the question?
Some Hon. Members: — Question.
Speaker Goudy: — Is it the pleasure of the Assembly
to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — Carried.
Deputy Clerk: — Third
reading of this bill.
Speaker Goudy: — When shall
the committee sit again? I recognize the Minister of Justice.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Next sitting, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — Next
sitting.
I
recognize the Government House Leader.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move that we
do now return to routine proceedings.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Government House Leader.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Apologies, Mr. Speaker. I request
leave.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister has asked leave. Is
leave granted?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy:
— Carried. So to confirm with the Assembly, we’ll now return to routine
proceedings.
Speaker
Goudy:
— I recognize the Chair of the Standing Committee on Human Services.
Michael Weger: — Mr. Speaker, I am instructed by the
Standing Committee on Human Services to report Bill No. 28, The Public Libraries Amendment Act, 2025
without amendment.
Speaker
Goudy:
— When shall this bill be considered in Committee of the Whole on Bills? I
recognize the Minister of Education.
Hon. Everett
Hindley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I request leave to waive
consideration in Committee of the Whole on this bill and that the bill be now
read the third time.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister has requested leave to
waive consideration in Committee of the Whole on Bill No. 28, The Public Libraries Amendment Act, 2025
and that the bill be now read the third time. Is leave granted?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister now may proceed to move
third reading.
Hon. Everett Hindley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move that the
bill be now read the third time and passed under its title.
Speaker Goudy: — It’s been moved by the minister that
the bill be now read the third time and passed under its title. Is the Assembly
ready for the question?
Some Hon. Members: — Question.
Speaker Goudy: — Is it the pleasure of the Assembly
to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — Carried.
Deputy Clerk: — Third reading of this bill.
Speaker
Goudy:
— I recognize the Chair of the Standing Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
and Justice.
Blaine McLeod: — Mr. Speaker, I am instructed by the
Standing Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs and Justice to report Bill
No. 26, The Miscellaneous Statutes Repeal Act, 2025 without
amendment.
[11:15]
Speaker Goudy: — When shall this bill be considered
in Committee of the Whole on Bills? I recognize the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — I request leave to waive consideration
in Committee of the Whole on this bill and that the bill be now read a third
time.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister has requested leave to
waive consideration in Committee of the Whole on Bill No. 26, The
Miscellaneous Statutes Repeal Act, 2025 without amendment and that the bill
be now read the third time. Is leave granted?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister may now proceed to move
third reading.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move that the
bill be now read a third time and passed under its title.
Speaker Goudy: — It has been moved by the minister
that the bill be now read the third time and passed under its title. Is the
Assembly ready for the question?
Some Hon. Members: — Question.
Speaker Goudy: — Is it the pleasure of the Assembly
to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — Carried.
Deputy Clerk: — Third reading of this bill.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the Chair of the
Standing Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs and Justice.
Blaine McLeod: — Mr. Speaker, I am instructed by the
Standing Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs and Justice to report Bill
No. 27, The Statute Law Amendment Act, 2025, a bilingual bill,
without amendment.
Speaker Goudy: — When shall this bill be considered
in Committee of the Whole on Bills? I recognize the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I request leave
to waive consideration in Committee of the Whole on this bill and that the bill
be now read a third time.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister has requested leave to
waive consideration in Committee of the Whole on Bill No. 27, The
Statute Law Amendment Act, 2025 without amendment and that the bill be now
read the third time. Is leave granted?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — The minister may now move third
reading.
Hon. Tim McLeod: — Mr. Speaker, I move that the bill be
now read a third time and passed under its title.
Speaker Goudy: — It’s been moved by the minister that
the bill be now read the third time and passed under its title. Is the Assembly
ready for the question?
Some Hon. Members: — Question.
Speaker Goudy: — Is it the pleasure of the Assembly
to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — Carried.
Deputy Clerk: — Third reading of this bill.
Speaker Goudy: — I
recognize the
Minister of Finance.
Hon. Jim Reiter: — Mr. Speaker, it’s my pleasure to submit
supplementary estimates accompanied by a message from Her Honour the Lieutenant
Governor of Saskatchewan.
Speaker Goudy: — Would you please rise for the
message from the Lieutenant Governor. The message is as follows:
The Lieutenant Governor transmits supplementary estimates
no. 1 of certain sums required for the service of the province for the 12
months ending March 31st, 2026, and recommends the same to the Legislative
Assembly.
Her Honour, the Honourable M. Bernadette McIntyre,
Lieutenant Governor, province of Saskatchewan.
Thank
you.
Speaker
Goudy:
— I recognize the member from Moose Jaw Wakamow.
Megan Patterson: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It is my
pleasure to speak today about the framework that this government has created
for strong economic growth. Creating an environment where the private sector
can flourish is actually the founding principle upon which this party was
created. The first guiding principle is that economic growth and job creation
through the private sector, not the government, is the engine of the economy.
We
are blessed with natural resources, but it is the guiding principles of our
party and the hard-working people in our province that come together to create
a strong foundation for our economic framework. This government uses building
blocks to elevate our strong foundation to create an ecosystem for economic
growth. Important building blocks include targeted incentives, diversified
markets, low costs, and stable regulations.
Our
investment-attracting strategy is actually the Saskatchewan advantage. And it
includes keeping our small-business tax rate low at 1 per cent, keeping utility
bundle costs among the lowest in the country, and maintaining a transparent and
predictable regulatory environment. In addition to the lowest small-business
tax rate, Saskatchewan is one of the highest small-business income tax
thresholds in Canada at 600,000.
Another
important building block in our framework of economic growth is the elimination
of the carbon tax. We’ve removed the carbon tax for everyone, becoming the
first carbon tax-free province in Canada. This strategic policy decision makes
our jurisdiction extremely attractive to energy-intense resource companies. It
also makes life more affordable for families across our province.
Why
is this framework to stimulate economic growth so important? Why am I talking
about it for 15 minutes? Well it’s not only important, but it’s crucial because
it’s only with a strong private sector that the government can generate the
revenue that we need to deliver investments in health care, education,
highways, and the social programs that our citizens rely on.
Another
example of the targeted incentive building block is the SME [small to
medium-sized enterprise] investment tax credit. I was happy to be at the SME
investment tax credit announcement at Pile O’ Bones brewery. This tax credit
will offer a 45 per cent non-refundable tax credit to individuals or
corporations who invest in the equity of an eligible industry to assist with
scaling up operations or expanding.
Another
example of an important building block for economic growth is our young
entrepreneur bursary program. Developed in partnership with the Saskatchewan
Chamber of Commerce, the Moose Jaw Chamber of Commerce awarded four local
businesses this $5,000 bursary.
Kelsey
Byers is a proud Indigenous entrepreneur and founder of Hometown Healing
massage therapy. Kelsey will use this grant to grow as a young entrepreneur,
deepen her experience, support community health, and strengthen Indigenous
representation in health care.
Montana
Falasca, another recipient, launched MontanasPhotoWorks,
which is a photography and videography business specializing in lifestyle,
branding, weddings, portraits, and creative storytelling. They are using the
bursary dollars to expand into a creative studio and event space to offer even
more value.
Rylan
Wheaton Photography offers photography and videography services to individuals
and businesses primarily capturing weddings, landscapes, artwork, and events.
The
final recipient of this bursary in Moose Jaw was Kolter Mealing. He runs The
Blue Line Hockey Shop, which is a quick, one-stop hockey shop offering skate
sharpening, profiling, and equipment repairs, with a focus on custom skate
comfort and fit. With this bursary they are expanding fitting services and are
enhancing their customer rewards system to recognize customer loyalty and add
value for every athlete in Moose Jaw.
These
economic building blocks that this government has put in place are supporting
start-ups, but they’re also attracting strong and significant investment in our
province. Examples of the recent investment in our province include of course
the BHP Jansen potash mine, which is the largest single mining investment in
Saskatchewan history; the commitment by K+S to double
potash production at the Bethune mine; the construction of two new uranium
mines, Denison mine and NexGen Energy. They’re ready to go, just awaiting
federal approval.
There
is a new Cargill canola crushing plant being built at the Global Transportation
Hub. The Louis Dreyfus Company is more than doubling the facility’s canola
crushing capacity and adding a new pea protein isolate production plant at the
same site. Richardson International is doubling its Yorkton canola crush plant
as well.
So
many investments in this province. I have to take a break. The east central
Saskatchewan net zero copper mine is another important development. This will
revive base metal mining, contributing to critical mineral supplies for clean
energy and electrification under a net zero emissions design.
These
building blocks are working. In 2024 Saskatchewan had the second-highest level
of total capital investment growth among the provinces, reaching nearly
$20 billion. A strong economic framework is critical because it creates
opportunities for our citizens through job creation. When businesses thrive,
they employ people, support families, and invest in communities.
One
of our government’s guiding principles is to provide a strong social safety net
which protects those in need while encouraging individuals to become
self-sufficient. It’s not about providing individuals with a hammock but a
safety net, and the opportunity to reach their potential and achieve the lives
they aspire to.
Our
province continues to show strong labour market growth. Nearly 20,000 jobs were
added year over year in March, leading the nation with a 3.4 per cent job
growth rate. Saskatchewan also has the lowest unemployment rate among provinces
at 4.9 per cent, well below the national average of 6.7 per cent. Mr. Speaker,
our economic framework is working. Year-over-year full-time employment
increased by 5,400 jobs, an increase of 1.1 per cent.
I
was happy to have the opportunity to bring greetings on behalf of this
government at the SaskAbilities event celebrating
Disability Employment Awareness Month, otherwise known as DEAM. The goal of
DEAM is to promote and bring awareness to the economic benefits of hiring
people with disabilities.
A
quote from Elle’s Cafe, an inclusive employer, that she had about her employee
Colton, who is legally blind:
Colton’s unwavering determination and his positive and
grateful attitude became a daily source of motivation for our entire team. He
demonstrated that many obstacles can evolve into chances for growth and wisdom.
This has motivated us all to surpass our own limits when facing challenges that
seem minor in comparison.
Inclusive
employment is another building block in our economic framework. The
Accessible Saskatchewan Act came into force in December of 2023. This Act
will work to remove barriers in the workplace, enabling individuals with
disabilities to contribute economically and giving them a sense of purpose.
Markus
is another example of an individual who benefited from inclusive employment.
Markus has always wanted to work, but he couldn’t find a job that was the right
fit. Then SaskAbilities came into his life, and he
realized he could be happy working part-time and using his training in
interactive design and technology. Through his résumé-writing and interview
skills that he learned from Partners in Employment, he secured a job at Code Ninjas.
A
quote from Markus is:
Before Partners, I really had no idea of what I could
handle and what I couldn’t. This was a huge issue for me. I needed to start
somewhere that I could be confident, and Partners helped me find that [says
Markus]. This job is something that I can actually say I’m really, really good
at. I’m super stoked about going into work every day and doing a good job every
day.
Inclusive
employment programs like Partners in Employment are another important building
block in our economic framework.
This
strong economic framework is also delivering in and around my constituency in
Moose Jaw Wakamow. At the Moose Jaw night at the
legislature we highlighted several businesses that have taken advantage of our
business-friendly ecosystem.
Simpson
Seeds took advantage of a targeted incentive to build a new pulse processing
facility. Donald’s Fine Foods was also represented. They made a
multi-million-dollar commitment to open a new sow harvest and processing
facility in our community, the first new pork processing facility in Canada in
over a decade. Once fully operational, they expect to employ nearly 500 people
in Moose Jaw.
[11:30]
Companies like JGL
and Golden West Trailer continue to expand their businesses, hire more people,
and make significant investments in our community, such as a $30,000
sponsorship that both companies made, totalling $60,000, to sponsor the Rockefeller
Christmas tree and the Moose Jaw Health Foundation. This government will
continue to create a framework with the necessary building blocks to foster
innovation, growth, and economic security for Saskatchewan families.
The
steady and decisive leadership of our Premier is at the helm of our strong
economic framework. He provides the clarity and consistency and determination
that Saskatchewan needs to compete and thrive. Our Premier has been tireless in
advocating for new trade opportunities from potash and pulse crops to uranium,
opening trade offices and doors in key markets around the world. We now export
to 161 countries.
He
recognizes that we won’t always see eye to eye with our partners on everything,
but he understands that protecting and growing Saskatchewan’s economy requires
maintaining productive relationships. His commitment to diplomacy and
engagement has strengthened ties with India and other countries. It is our
Saskatchewan Premier that has contributed to repairing Canada’s broader
relationship with India, work that will deliver significant benefits for our
country and our province.
The
foundation we’ve built, grounded in the party principles that we have,
strengthened by the building blocks, combined with our Premier’s strong
leadership, have set the framework for strong economic growth in this province.
And the results speak for themselves.
Mr.
Speaker, today is a great day to be alive and a great day to live in
Saskatchewan. And with that I’ll read the motion:
That this Assembly supports the government’s work in
creating a framework for strong economic growth.
Thank
you.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — It has
been moved by the member from Moose Jaw Wakamow:
That the Assembly supports the government’s work in
creating a framework for strong economic growth.
Is
the Assembly ready for the question? I recognize the member from Saskatoon Silverspring.
Hugh Gordon: — Thank you,
Mr. Deputy Speaker. I’m glad to be on my feet today to discuss this motion put
forward. I might end up beating up on the word “framework” a few times, so
please bear with me. You’ve been forewarned.
I’m not sure quite frankly, Mr. Deputy Speaker,
how this government can even talk about a framework for strong economic growth
when they can’t even balance the books. Why don’t you start with having a
balanced budget first?
And why is that important, Mr. Speaker? Well
it’s important for a number of reasons, not the least of which is because
businesses and industries need to have certainty on where to invest their
dollars beforehand, and they need to have confidence in a government and its
finances. And when the Government of Saskatchewan says that they’re going to
have a balanced budget, that they actually have a balanced budget.
And why is that important? Again it’s because
they know that for every dollar that this government overspends, it is another
dollar they are going to come for in future taxes right out of their pockets.
And they know that. They need to trust that this government has a credible plan
to balance their books and that it has a contingency plan in place in the event
that circumstances change, and that they just don’t go about making up stuff as
they go along, just like we forewarned last spring.
The Finance minister and the members opposite
took every opportunity in this Chamber and out to applaud themselves for their
so-called balanced budget, which is now a whopping $427 million deficit and counting
— what a shock.
And
what did the Finance minister say was an underlying reason for being so wildly
off on his numbers, Mr. Deputy Speaker? Why, tariffs of course. And what
contingencies did the Finance minister put in his budget to deal with those
tariffs? What assurances did he give all of our industries that this government
had a plan to deal with the impact of tariffs on business and industries? Well
there wasn’t any, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
There
was no plan, certainly nothing resembling any kind of framework that was in
their budget apart from a very, very short note on one page of their budget
about tariffs. Whether it’s the canola industry, the steel industry, the
manufacturing industry and many others, this government kept saying, don’t
worry; be happy.
But
now look at the damage that’s been caused by this trade war and the
accompanying tariffs on our industries. Retail sales in Saskatchewan have
dropped a full percentage point just from August to September and, year to
date, have dropped 1.6 per cent — the worst record in the country.
The
first eight months of 2025, manufacturing sales are down 5.8 per cent, the
second-largest decline amongst all the provinces. Year over year as of last
August, a 7.85 per cent decline. This province is on pace to sell a billion
dollars less to manufacturing goods just this year. How’s that framework
working out for you?
StatsCan
reports that Saskatchewan has had a 14 per cent reduction in exports to the
United States this year. And if that wasn’t enough, Saskatchewan has suffered a
25.6 per cent decline in exports to China. But again there’s no framework for
these businesses and industries, just more blind, Milton Friedman faith in free
markets, and with such an incredibly naive, laissez-faire attitude that even
Adam Smith would find offensive.
And
let’s talk about this government’s record on growth. That’s a great one. Its
own budget forecasted a growth of GDP [gross domestic product] between 1.8 and
2 per cent, but that is now falling, Mr. Deputy Speaker. And this province’s
average real GDP growth of only 1 per cent per year is the worst record since
the 1960s.
During
COVID our economy fell by 4.18 per cent. And while other provinces were
rebounding in their economies after COVID, the Saskatchewan economy fell
another 2.3 per cent. It wasn’t until 2023 that our economy finally got back to
2018 levels.
Saskatchewan
ranked last in Canada for growth for most of the past seven years. That is not
a strong framework. It’s really quite frankly a bad roller-coaster ride where
the cart never goes all the way to the top anymore.
Let’s
also talk about how this government’s proclivity to slap the PST [provincial
sales tax] on everything that walks, crawls, or breathes in this province is
cited as a direct barrier by 37 per cent of our small and medium-sized
enterprises to investment in this province. Our small businesses have faced
ever-rising costs, have had to raise their prices, delayed their expansion
plans, or couldn’t even pay themselves properly. No wonder two-thirds of
small-business owners don’t feel supported by this government. What kind of
framework is that?
We
know that putting the PST on construction labour and productivity-enhancing
equipment has also deterred investment in this province. Quite frankly not too
bright. Even GDP per capita, which is the most recognized approach to measuring
our standard of living, has fallen from $66,173 in 2018 to $64,525 in 2024.
When you adjust for inflation, we are going backward even in real terms.
But
yet this government continues to pretend that its policies are working. Only
this government, Mr. Deputy Speaker, would crow about not lifting a finger to
provide badly needed supports to industry. And when they succeed in spite of
this government, the members of this government want to be the first in line
for all the photo ops to claim their success. Talk about stolen valour.
And
how can this government talk about creating a strong framework for economic
growth when businesses and industries are still being forced to pay the Sask Party carbon tax? That’s right, Mr. Speaker. Despite
assurances from the other side, it’s still there. And according to this own
government’s second-quarter report, the government and that Finance minister
are still counting on $432 million from their industrial carbon tax to
help keep their coffers full. That’s a heck of a framework, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
And
businesses aren’t stupid. They know that this government’s track record on
negotiating with the federal government — hint: it’s not good — and they know
that the odds that the federal government is going to pick up the tab for their
Sask Party industrial carbon tax is also not very
good, and therefore they will be stuck with the bill once again and most likely
well into the foreseeable future. And if they don’t, they fear that this
government will just tax them all the more to make up for their bad management.
This
is also a government, Mr. Deputy Speaker, that says it champions economic
development in this province and all the opportunities within it, like opening
up the North. Well you can’t open up the North without investments in
infrastructure. If P.A. [Prince Albert] is really the Gateway to the North,
then why are we not investing more into our highways and roads north of P.A.?
Why aren’t we in fact putting a second bridge in Prince Albert to open up the
North?
How
about investing in our shortline rail facilities to
facilitate the movement of our products out of Saskatchewan and to ports on the
coasts? Like investing in broadband internet for rural Saskatchewan to help
businesses connect to markets? These are some of the kinds of investments, a framework
if you will, Mr. Speaker, that won’t be solved with an ad hoc tax credit or
reduction in red tape.
First
it takes the will to do it. Then it takes hard work — the kind of work this
government has been allergic to — by working with the communities, all of the
communities in the North, to make these badly needed investments. Not just for
the people living there, but for businesses and investors who recognize the
potential there. They need a government willing to make these infrastructure
investments.
Furthermore,
Mr. Speaker, investments in child care, investments in education, in
post-secondary education, investments in health care, investments in housing,
in mental health and addictions, these are also the kinds of investments that
need to be a part of a framework for economic growth.
Without
child care and housing, businesses like BHP can’t attract workers for their
mine. Without education and lower tuition fees, our kids will go elsewhere to
get the skills and training they need to earn a living, and they most likely
won’t be coming back when they do so. Without investments in health care,
Saskatchewan’s becoming an unattractive option for families and seniors looking
to retire here. Without investments in addictions and mental health services
and supports, we risk losing more of our young people, quite literally, their
lives.
Tell
me, Mr. Speaker, what good is a framework for economic growth when it leaves
the people of this province out of the equation? It’s time for this government
to get real, stop with all the self-congratulatory back-patting exercises and
platitudes and start to do the real work of building a province from the people
up.
And
therefore, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I cannot support this motion, and I urge all
members of this Assembly to vote against it. Thank you.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Canora-Pelly.
Sean Wilson: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I
want to begin today talking about something foundational, something that tells
the story about what real economic leadership looks like in Saskatchewan.
When we’re in
Regina, the backdrop is often the Co-op Refinery Complex. But long before it
was known by that name, it was the NewGrade
Upgrader, a project launched in the 1980s under a
Conservative provincial government that understood something simple but
profound: real growth requires courage.
People
forget this. This upgrader didn’t get built in one year. It didn’t pay off in
one election cycle. It was a multi-year, multi-phase project that began in the 1980s and continued into the very early ’90s. Because this is how you build real economic assets —
slowly, strategically, and with conviction. It created thousands of
construction jobs, anchored long-term refinery employment, and helped shape
Regina’s industrial base for generations.
And, Mr. Speaker, the Regina upgrader
wasn’t the only example of long-term conservative vision. Right around the same
era, the Lloydminster upgrader was also moving forward, again because
conservative governments in Saskatchewan and Alberta believed in value-added
production, believed in long-term jobs, and believed in saying yes to
opportunity.
Conservative leadership made the
Lloydminster upgrader possible. It pushed it ahead. Conservative leadership
took the risk. And the NDP? They hesitated. They doubted. And they even opposed
the kind of long-term investment and expansion that could have made the
upgrader even bigger, even more competitive, and even more valuable to
Saskatchewan workers. Mr. Speaker, both the Regina and Lloydminster upgraders
stand as monuments to a simple truth: history rewards the builders, not the
talkers.
[11:45]
And that’s why I support this motion:
That the Assembly
supports the government’s work in creating a framework for strong economic
growth.
Because strong economic outcomes never
happen by accident. They are the result of governments who say yes to
investment, yes to growth, and yes to Saskatchewan.
On one side, our government is
delivering a competitive tax environment; predictable, transparent regulation;
record provincial productivity; strong investment incentives; a diversified
economy; and nine international offices connecting Saskatchewan to global
markets.
On the other side, the NDP offers higher
taxes; more red tape; anti-business messaging; a belief that government, not
the private sector, should direct the economy; and a backwards-looking economic
mindset.
Mr. Speaker, Saskatchewan cannot compete
globally with NDP economics — not then, not in 2025, and not with the pressures
we face. So let me weave in what Saskatchewan is doing right now to stay
competitive in a world that is changing fast.
Our investment attraction strategy is
the roadmap to meeting our growth plan target of 16 billion in private
capital investment annually. And, Mr. Speaker, it’s working. Private capital
investment reached 14.7 billion in 2024. That’s a 17.3 per cent increase,
the highest increase in the entire country. Total capital investment hit
19.9 billion, the second-highest provincial increase. These are not
theoretical numbers. They represent real projects, real employers, and real
paycheques.
The NDP could not attract this level of
investment when they were in power, and they cannot explain how they would
attract it today. Saskatchewan has the second-lowest small-business tax rate in
the country, one of the highest small-business income thresholds at $600,000,
the second-lowest manufacturing and processing tax rate. This is deliberate,
strategic, and this is why we win projects. Meanwhile the NDP’s track record is
the opposite: tax more, spend more, grow less.
Our red tape reduction committee has
saved Saskatchewan businesses 682 million since 2015. Those savings
matter. They free up capital, they encourage job creation, and they set
Saskatchewan apart from provinces that bury businesses in paperwork. That’s why
the Fraser Institute ranks Saskatchewan the number one jurisdiction in Canada
and the number three in the world for mining investment attractiveness. Yeah.
Saskatchewan is the most attractive jurisdiction in Canada for oil and gas
investment. This is competitiveness, leadership, and this is what the NDP would
dismantle.
Saskatchewan has one of the most
productive labour forces in the country, over $74 GDP per hour worked, second
only to Alberta, outpacing the national average by more than $10 an hour. That
productivity is driven by construction, wholesale trade, manufacturing, energy,
agriculture, potash and uranium, and a growing critical minerals sector.
And who benefits? Well welders in
Yorkton; millwrights in Wadena; power engineers commuting to Regina and Lloyd;
truckers hauling grain, fuel, lumber; oil field workers; farmers; and small
businesses in places like Sturgis, Kamsack, Norquay,
and Canora. A strong economy keeps these people working. The NDP policies would
not.
South of the border, the Trump
administration is committed to cutting US [United States] manufacturing tax
rate from 21 per cent to 15 per cent. They are removing permitting hurdles for
domestic resource development, and they are courting global mineral investment
aggressively. Saskatchewan must stay competitive. This government is taking
action. The NDP wouldn’t.
For the people of Canora-Pelly, Yorkton,
Kelvington-Wadena, this is not academic. This is daily life. Farmers depend on
strong transportation systems. Tradespeople depend on investment. Seniors
depend on stability. Municipalities depend on certainty. And young people
depend on opportunity close to home.
When the economy is strong, our region
thrives. When the economy weakens, our region feels it first. And, Mr. Speaker,
our government understands that. The NDP never have. Mr. Speaker, the Regina
and Lloydminster upgraders remind us of that fundamental truth: you cannot cut,
delay, tax, and regulate your way into prosperity. You must build your way into
it. This government is building; the NDP would block. And that’s why I support
this motion.
Mr. Speaker, I want to bring us back to
something simple — leadership. Real leadership is measured not by what a
government says, but by what it builds. And Saskatchewan’s history tells a
clear story. In the 1980s the Conservative government
built the Regina upgrader, a project that took vision, courage, and long-term
commitment. They built the Lloydminster upgrader, another bold multi-year
project that still provides jobs and value-added production today. Those projects
weren’t easy. They weren’t popular with everyone. They weren’t politically
convenient, but they were right. And the NDP, they hesitated. They resisted
expansion. They refused to think big. They have never, in their entire history,
built anything of that scale.
Mr. Speaker, that same choice stands
before us today. Saskatchewan is attracting record levels of private capital
investment because our government is competitive, not complacent.
14.7 billion in private investment, 19.9 billion in total investment,
the highest private investment growth rate in Canada — this isn’t luck, chance;
this is policy. Our competitive taxes, our predictable regulation, our red tape
reduction, our strong workforce productivity, our international offices, our
investment attraction strategy — all of it is deliberate.
This government chooses growth; the NDP
chooses fear. This government chooses opportunity; the NDP chooses bad policy.
This government chooses the future; the NDP just regurgitate old talking
points. Mr. Speaker, farmers can’t afford NDP economics. Construction crews in
Yorkton cannot afford NDP economics. Small businesses in places like Canora,
Kamsack, Norquay, and Sturgis can’t afford NDP
economics. Because every time they were in power, investment collapsed, young
people left, and Saskatchewan stalled. And every time our government has
stepped up, we have built. We have grown, invested, and led. And that is why,
proudly and without hesitation, I support this motion. Thank you.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Just before I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Westview, I want to just say to both sides
of the House, the common courtesy of respect and listening will be definitely
enforced here. So I’ll recognize the member from Saskatoon Westview.
April ChiefCalf: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. And I just want to say that as an educator, I
appreciate that because it’s a little disconcerting sometimes when we’re
speaking in the legislature and we can’t use our classroom management skills to
get, you know, folks back on track and engaged.
I rise today in the Saskatchewan
legislature to oppose the motion that Saskatchewan Legislative Assembly
supports the government’s work in creating a framework for strong economic
growth.
Now what I want to say, Mr. Deputy
Speaker, is that it’s not that I’m opposed to strong economic growth in our
province. A strong economy is the foundation for good jobs, for funding
essential services such as health care and education, for infrastructure such
as highways, and for paying down and managing debt. A strong economy is
important for our province to grow, to ensure that everyone has a roof over
their head and their basic needs are met and that our children and youth have
opportunities for quality post-secondary education and jobs.
But, Mr. Deputy Speaker, the reality of
our province since the Premier took office is that debts and deficits have
soared. Economic growth has been unstable, and rising inequalities are evident
throughout our province. There has been an ongoing increase in taxation through
the PST, record numbers of houselessness and people using the food bank, high
financial anxiety, the lowest levels of per-student funding for K to 12
[kindergarten to grade 12] education, and an expanding health care crisis.
So, Mr. Deputy Speaker, my point isn’t
that Saskatchewan is a bad place to live. And just to clarify, I left
Saskatchewan in 1987 and so did a lot of my friends. Okay, who was in power
then? I came back in 1991 and Saskatchewan has been my home ever since. And I
convinced my husband from Alberta to marry me and move here, so there we go.
My point is actually that Saskatchewan
isn’t being governed responsibly, and this shows in our economy. And when we
examine our economy looking at measurable outcomes versus talking points and
anecdotes, we see that the growth framework has been poorly planned and
inconsistent. The outlook for 2025 is weak, with the projected budget failing,
small businesses struggling, industrial carbon tax confusion — did we eliminate
it or not, it’s still on the books — and a declining standard of living.
This is a point that I want to take up
for the remainder of my time here. The real GDP per capita has fallen from
66,000 in 2018 to 64,000 in 2024, and this government is the only one in 50
years to actually reduce Saskatchewan’s standard of living.
Mr. Deputy Speaker, economies aren’t
just about markets and money. They are also about people. And if the people
aren’t doing well, then really your economy isn’t healthy either. So let’s
consider a few key areas of where people are hurting in our province and our
economy is being impacted by these circumstances.
Let’s start with houselessness, Mr.
Deputy Speaker. As the shadow minister for Housing, I am constantly researching
the issue both locally and on a larger scale. We know that homelessness has
increased on a national, international level, but this does not mean it’s okay
for us to be experiencing it here. The point-in-time counts, or PIT counts, in
Saskatoon in 2022 identified that there were 550 people unhoused. The PIT count
for 2024 found 1,500 people were unhoused, and the recent numbers from 2025 showed
1,931. The numbers are growing, but why?
Now the Premier and the Minister of
Social Services have both declared here in the Legislative Assembly that it’s
cut and dry: homelessness is simply caused by addictions. And the Minister of
Social Services last spring cited a post on Facebook by a city councillor in
Saskatoon that had revealed some preliminary data from the report on the PIT
count that had not actually yet been released. Mr. Speaker, without the actual
report, they misunderstood the data.
So what did the full report actually
reveal? It revealed that 55 per cent of people surveyed in the PIT count
identified evictions as the cause of their houselessness, and only 19.6 per
cent identified a substance use disorder as the cause of their housing loss.
Another 32.8 per cent identified insufficient income as the cause of their
housing loss.
You
know, Mr. Speaker, we can’t actually solve problems if we don’t understand the
cause of the problem and if we just jump to conclusions. The respondents in the
PIT count also noted that sufficient income and assistance in finding an
affordable place to live were key to getting housing.
Houselessness
has a tremendous impact on our economy. It can affect small businesses and it
can be very expensive for the municipalities that have to try to find ways to
dismantle encampments, shelter people, and provide security on transit, among
other issues. Houselessness is also expensive on a provincial level when people
are constantly seeking medical care, because living on the street causes so
many health issues. Mr. Speaker, keeping people in poverty is not good for the
economy.
[12:00]
Now,
Mr. Speaker, moving on to rent control. I’ve been doing a significant amount of
research on this topic and I want to challenge the main talking point that is
being leveraged by the Minister of Finance that rent control destroys housing
supply and, like some rent control fairy comes along and magically waves their
wand and poof, all the housing disappears just because you’ve implemented rent
control.
But
first of all, let’s be clear — not all economists agree that rent control has
detrimental effects on the supply of rental housing. For example, in 2023, 32
economists signed onto a letter to the federal housing finance agency agreeing
that “there is substantial evidence that rent regulation policies do not limit
construction nor the overall supply of housing.”
And
this was in Washington, DC [District of Columbia], and this group of economists
was extremely distressed by the plight of tenants in that state at that time.
Others have found mixed results throughout the world, and this is often the
result of the specifics in each piece of rent control legislation and of
government policies and taxation that may affect construction, such as the PST,
investment, and supply.
Many
of the economists that make the supply-and-demand claim don’t even include
Canada in their studies. And yet, you know, Mr. Speaker, there are numerous
experts who study housing in Canada. Why not take their research into
consideration? Experts such as Carolyn Whitzman, who
wrote Home Truths and noted that we only have 5 per cent of housing in
Canada that is operated as non-market housing. Ninety-five per cent of housing
in Canada is market-based housing.
Housing
is a human right, not a commodity. And if rent control universally leads to
less investment in supply, how do you explain Prince Edward Island, who is
leading the country in new investment in residential construction but also have
rent control? How do you explain that Saskatchewan is in a supply crisis when
we don’t have rent control? Again, designing policy and legislation requires
thorough research and consultation.
So
further, Mr. Speaker, if this government was truly concerned about housing
supply, they would invest in affordable non-market housing, repairing and
opening up our existing social housing stock, building new affordable homes,
and cancelling the PST on labour construction that has in fact caused a
slowdown in the construction of new homes in our province. And if this
government was truly concerned about tenants, they would pass our rent control
legislation.
In
conclusion, Mr. Deputy Speaker, from 2018 to 2025 our province has experienced
inconsistent and below-potential economic growth and poor policy when it comes
to our economy. And one of the results is a decline in the standard of living
for our residents. I cannot support this framework for economic growth. Thank
you.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Moosomin-Montmartre.
Kevin Weedmark: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. It’s
an honour to speak to this motion:
That the Assembly support the government’s work in creating
a framework for strong economic growth.
I
think I understand a little bit about economic growth. I’m very fortunate. One
of my businesses that I own in Moosomin has grown 400 per cent since I bought
it, and it’s still growing as of now. And that’s partially because of our
amazing staff, but it’s partially because of the conditions that the provincial
government has set.
Creating
a framework for economic growth is the most important thing we can do, Mr.
Speaker, because Saskatchewan is a province brimming with potential. And to
realize that potential, we have to always create the right conditions for
economic growth. I’m proud of the Saskatchewan government’s record on the
economy, what we’ve accomplished, how we’ve positioned our province for
long-term success, and how we will continue driving growth that benefits every
region and every citizen.
Saskatchewan
has always punched far above its weight. We’re home to only one and a quarter
million people, and yet we help feed and power the world. We export to 161
countries. We export food to every corner of the world. We supply the world
with potash to grow its food. We export the energy needed to keep industries
running and homes warm. We produce the uranium that helps decarbonize global
electricity grids.
We
have amazing resources, but developing them successfully depends on vision,
leadership, and commitment. Over the last decade Saskatchewan has attracted
billions of dollars in private sector capital — investments that are building
new mines, expanding food processing, growing manufacturing, and creating jobs
in every corner of the province.
BHP
approved a $6.4 billion investment in stage two of the Jansen potash
project, making its planned total investment $19 billion. K+S Potash announced plans to increase production to
4 million tonnes per year at the Bethune potash mine, with a
$3 billion expansion project. Foran is spending $826 million to bring
its copper mine to commercial production.
Louis
Dreyfus’s expansion of canola processing in Yorkton and the addition of a new
pea protein plant will create 120 new jobs. Cargill is spending
$350 million on its canola crush project at the Global Transportation Hub
that will employ 50 people. Richardson’s canola crush plant expansion in
Yorkton has doubled processing capacity to 2.2 million metric tons
annually.
Oil
and gas producers are expanding production thanks to targeted incentives,
reinvesting in Saskatchewan wells, workers, and technology. We have a growing
value-added agriculture industry that keeps more processing and more prosperity
right here at home in Saskatchewan.
Manufacturing
companies are expanding into global supply chains such as IJACK,
which right now is more than doubling the size of its manufacturing plant in
Moosomin, adding 35,000 square feet after just opening the original plant just
six years ago. And they sell oil field equipment manufactured, designed, and
engineered in Moosomin, all around the world.
Crestline
Coach added 30,000 square feet to their manufacturing facility in Saskatoon.
Pro Metal Industries built a new 50,000 square foot facility in Regina last
year. Inland Steel invested in a major expansion in its Lloydminster facility
this year. And there are many more.
And,
Mr. Deputy Speaker, these investments didn’t appear by accident. They came
about because Saskatchewan has built one of the most competitive business
environments in Canada, an environment that rewards innovation and encourages
growth. The province has a target of increasing the value of manufacturing
exports by 50 per cent compared to 2020, and this goal was surpassed in 2024
with manufacturing exports totalling $11.5 billion.
And
to help that growth continue, applications are open for the small and medium
enterprise investment tax credit, which is designed to encourage investment in
Saskatchewan manufacturing. We live in a world that needs what Saskatchewan
produces more than ever before. The global population is growing. The demand
for food is rising. The push for clean, reliable energy is intensifying, and
the need for critical minerals is increasing. And Saskatchewan stands at the
centre of all of it.
Saskatchewan
has more than two-thirds of global potash reserves. Here in this province, Mr.
Deputy Speaker, we have the world’s largest high-grade uranium deposits. We are
a major energy-producing province with still untapped potential, and we are a
powerhouse in agriculture, from grains and oilseeds to livestock and specialty
crops. We have a fast-growing agri-food processing sector, turning raw products
into finished goods right here at home.
Saskatchewan
exports more per capita than any province in Canada, and we’re expanding trade
into new markets every single year, Mr. Deputy Speaker. We have trade offices
established around the world to work for Saskatchewan exporters, opening doors
for farmers, for miners, for processors, and manufacturers.
I
spoke yesterday about some of the important work of those trade offices and
trade missions being recognized in a Globe and Mail article and in
comments by the federal Agriculture minister, who said that if Canada can come
to an agreement with India on trade, it will have Saskatchewan to thank for its
relationship with India.
Saskatchewan
exports potash, uranium, and pulse crops to India. And little old Saskatchewan
accounts for 40 per cent of Canada’s exports to India. And I was pleased to see
the Indian High Commissioner here at the reception last night and in the House
today.
Mr.
Speaker, small and medium-sized businesses account for the majority of jobs in
Saskatchewan. They sponsor our local teams, give to our fundraisers, and invest
in the communities where they live and work. Our government has provided tax
relief and investment incentives, the most important of which is keeping the
small-business tax rate at 1 per cent permanently, and has helped entrepreneurs
scale up from local markets to global exporters, and the small and medium
enterprise investment tax credit is helping do just that.
I’m
proud of our government’s focus on young entrepreneurs with the youth
entrepreneurship bursary. Across my riding I see young entrepreneurs stepping
up, from the very young women who moved from Alberta to Moosomin to open Trends
Mercantile, to the McGill University grad who upon graduating business school
in Montreal moved to Wolseley, Saskatchewan to open a wonderful little business
called The Garden Club, and to the young woman who got together with some local
investors to set up Third Avenue on Main, an amazing and very busy little
business. Small-business success is economic development, and our government
has made Saskatchewan a province where entrepreneurs feel empowered to take
risks and to grow.
Now,
Mr. Speaker, I’m proud of our government’s record on growing the economy, and I
want to contrast that with the record of the former NDP government. I made a
statement on potash back in the spring. And, Mr. Speaker, I’m very fortunate. I
always get a lot of comments back from my constituents. And after I made that
statement on potash, I heard from Phil Hamm. He’s a community leader and he’s a
long-time mayor of Fleming, Saskatchewan. I’m just going to read his words
here. He said:
Well said, Kevin, and absolutely true. I worked at the
sylvite potash mine, now Nutrien, near Rocanville in 1974. Then-owner Hudson Bay Mining and
Smelting were planning a huge expansion of their mine. HBMS
was ready to invest huge amounts of private money into our area and create
hundreds more jobs and wealth for Saskatchewan and Canada.
I was working for the capital projects superintendent who
called me to his office and informed me of the plans. His advice was to
relocate to Rocanville and be prepared to work lots
of overtime for the following four years. He told me I was in the right place
at the right time and the next few years could set me up for a bright future.
There was a buzz of excitement around the area and I felt giddy, like I’d just
won the lottery.
Still
quoting. He says:
However that summer the premier’s bus tour brought Allan
Blakeney to visit. A few weeks later the sylvite mine site became like a
morgue. Models and plans for expansion disappeared. High-ranking executives
left for HBMS divisions in northern Manitoba and
Mexico. It had been made clear by the NDP government that sylvite was one of
the potash mines they were going to expropriate.
“The
feeling of betrayal has never left me,” he said. So that’s a first-hand account
of how a former NDP government’s policy impacted one person, one mine, one
industry.
And
now the situation couldn’t be more different. Nutrien
Rocanville employs a massive workforce. They’re a
huge force in southeast Saskatchewan and I was happy to be there a few weeks
ago when Nutrien was rewarded for its work on
sustainability with funding from the technology fund.
So
that’s just one example of how our government is doing the right thing by
creating the right conditions. And that’s why, Mr. Speaker, we are not just
surviving, we are thriving in Saskatchewan. And that’s why I support this
motion. Thank you very much.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Keith Jorgenson: — Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It’s an
absolute honour to be on my feet. You know, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I want to talk
about something truly mysterious today, something that defies the law of
nature, bends logic and time itself. It’s something that was made right here in
Saskatchewan.
You
know, we have all kinds of math in the world. We have algebra, geo-trig,
calculus, and a variety of math that was created right here in Saskatchewan in
this very Chamber, Mr. Deputy Speaker — Sask Party
math.
Sask Party math is truly unique because all those other kinds
of math get hung up on little things like adding and subtracting. Sask Party math is totally and completely different, Mr.
Deputy Speaker. It frees you of all those things.
There’s
another way to think about Sask Party math, Mr.
Deputy Speaker. You might have heard of the term “feel facts.” You know,
they’re not quite true but they feel true. Sask Party
math is kind of like that, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It’s like “feel math.”
[12:15]
You
know, a great example of this was the most recent budget. A lot of people
criticized this budget when it was passed because they said it was obviously
not balanced. But you know, those folks did not embrace Sask
Party math, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Because the folks that embrace Sask Party math . . . sorry, because those folks
felt that the budget was balanced. And isn’t that important too, Mr. Deputy
Speaker? Because with Sask Party math, “feel numbers”
are important too.
Mr.
Speaker, if you look at your bank account and you saw a negative balance, you
know, that can make you feel bad about yourself. Sask
Party math teaches you to embrace the idea that you should act like you have
the amount of money that you think you should have, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, the number −427 million is an ugly, ugly number. Sask Party math teaches us to look beyond the minus sign. Sask Party math teaches us that we shouldn’t feel so bad
about ourselves, because we tried. Sask Party math
tells us we should all just go for lunch and never speak of this ugliness
again.
Mr.
Speaker, let’s explore some of the mysteries of Sask
Party math together because I think this truly speaks to the motion moved by
the member from Moose Jaw Wakamow. Because the
premise of that motion could only be true with Sask
Party math.
Mr.
Speaker, before we dive into the fuzzy details of this unique kind of math, I
want to tell you a little bit of a story. You know, for more than 20 years, Mr.
Deputy Speaker, I was a teacher, and for most of those years I taught young
people with behavioural disorders.
So
I want to share a little story from my days teaching at Chief Taylor school in
Onion Lake. I remember one day another teacher came up to me and said that one
of my students, we’ll call him Kevin, had gone into her classroom and taken
some candy out of the classroom. And so I went to Kevin, and I said, “Kevin,
did you take the candy out of Ms. Smith’s classroom?” And Kevin replied, “Tom
and I didn’t take the candy out of the classroom.” So I said, “Let’s get this
straight. So only you and Tom were the ones that didn’t take the candy out of
the classroom?” And he replied eagerly, “Yes, we were the only two that didn’t
take the candy.”
Now
when we’re thinking about Sask Party government math,
I thought of this story. Kevin, however ridiculously absurd it was, shifted the
blame to essentially everyone and anyone except for himself. That is the key to
applying Sask Party math. You know, I call that the
integer cha-cha. Whenever you encounter a negative number, you blame someone
else. If it’s a positive one, time to take credit.
So
let’s dive into the messy, fuzzy world of “feel math.” Now to create a
framework for strong economic growth, we need strong public finances,
competitive taxation, solid economic fundamentals, and a talented workforce.
So
let’s explore some of those things through the lens of Sask
Party math. Let’s start with public finances. Strong public finances keep taxes
low and provide businesses with the confidence that they need to invest and
grow their businesses. You know, the Sask Party
government has run deficits in 9 of the last 11 years, and I’m sure that’s what
the members opposite are talking about now. They’re looking for where the
balanced budget went. But that’s going to take a while, Mr. Speaker.
So
in 9 of the last 11 years, they’ve run deficits, and we’re on track now to
triple our public debt this year. You know, Mr. Deputy Speaker, that’s hard to
explain away on the surface. I mean several days in Vegas could maybe explain
that for an individual, but it’s a little bit trickier for a government.
Now
remember, if you feel like you did a good job, then Sask
Party math tells us to not let the pesky minus sign get in the way of feeling
good about yourself and patting yourself on the back. Remember, just blame
someone else.
The
key is to change up who you blame because you don’t want to be repetitive. So I
would suggest something kind of like a Magic 8 Ball. You could maybe call it a
blame ball, where you just throw in a few favourites, like you could blame the
NDP from the ’90s, China, global forces, Trudeau. You
could claim that you had the most ambitious plan. Maybe throw chemtrails in
too. Be creative.
Now
let’s talk about taxation next. In 2027 the Saskatchewan NDP collected
$874 million in PST. This year this Sask Party
government is going to collect $3.3 billion. When I saw that, I said,
“Wow, that’s a lot of tax,” Mr. Deputy Speaker. That’s an increase of 300 per
cent in taxation, and that works out to almost $3,000 per Saskatchewan
resident. You know, I’m not going to candy-coat that, Mr. Speaker. That could
make some people mad.
But
remember Sask Party “feel math” tells us not to worry
about the details. Just blame someone else. I mean could be the NDP, could be
chemtrails.
So
I’m going to be serious for a second. You know, jokes aside. Sometimes —
there’s a saying — if you didn’t laugh, you would cry.
You
know, one of my consistent criticisms of this government, Mr. Deputy Speaker,
is the inability to see the interconnectivity between various things that are
going on in our society and our economy. And so I think we in Saskatoon and
Regina see that all the time, and it’s very, very frustrating. We talk about an
economic framework for strong growth. You’re ignoring all of the other factors
that go into it such as . . . I was sort of jokingly talking about
public debt. But I want to talk about people now, and the effect that this
government has had on the people that we depend upon to build a strong,
resilient economy.
So
I own a business on 20th Street in Saskatoon. And every day you walk down 20th
Street, and you would see the same thing in Regina, absolutely the most
difficult economic conditions you could imagine. You know, one of our
neighbours on 20th Street talks about how because of the explosion in
homelessness in our province — latest count is 2,000 people in Saskatoon — that
each day she comes to her business, someone has used the washroom in front of
her front door and in the winter that freezes.
So
you know, this is a human tragedy for those people that with assistance could
be working and paying taxes. But also as business owners across the province
are struggling under the weight of this government ignoring these massive
social problems and just pretending they don’t exist and pretending that there
is no economic impact on business when we allow homelessness and addiction to
explode and spread throughout our province.
You
know, we’ve talked in Saskatoon with councillors and mayors — and even as my
role as associate deputy Health critic, I talk to a lot of small-town
administrators — and they all say the exact same thing. They want to get back
to the job of running a town or a city, right.
But
even today the mayor of Kipling was talking to the press, and she was telling
that they’ve now purchased their fourth house. I’ve talked to RMs that have spent in excess of a million dollars on
health care. This is all money that can’t be invested in building
infrastructure and economic growth because that money is being put into doing
the job of the provincial government. And that’s just plain sad, Mr. Deputy
Speaker.
You
know, again each day when I drive through my home city of Saskatoon, I feel
like sometimes I don’t recognize what has become of the city because of the
degree to which this government has allowed homelessness and addictions to
spread without addressing them. You know, even in downtown Saskatoon you see
building after building with for-lease signs. Our downtowns are emptying out,
and this isn’t free, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
So
you know, if someone’s asking me if I can support this motion, the idea that
this government has built a strong framework to support economic growth, that
simply doesn’t hold water. It is, plain and simple, Sask
Party math. And you know, I would rather actually use real math where a
balanced budget is balanced and we treat the people who run our economy with
dignity and respect, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Thank you.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — The 65‑minute period has expired.
The 10‑minute period, question-and-answer period, will begin. I recognize
the member from Saskatoon Silverspring.
Hugh Gordon: — Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Does the
member from Moosomin-Montmartre approve of his government’s continuing
collection of their industrial carbon tax? And does he still expect
Saskatchewan businesses to pay up?
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Moosomin-Montmartre.
Kevin Weedmark: — Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy
Speaker. As was announced in the spring, Saskatchewan became the first carbon
tax-free province in the nation of Canada. And for our government, Mr. Speaker,
business tax competitiveness is very important. The carbon tax nationally was a
drag on our economy, did a lot of damage to all of us.
And
Saskatchewan, we have taken the lead on trying to make business taxes as
competitive as possible. We are keeping the small-business tax rate at 1 per
cent, and we are trying to make things affordable for businesses. Thank you,
Mr. Deputy Speaker.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from Carrot
River Valley.
Terri Bromm: — Members opposite have actively
campaigned against building pipelines to BC and in 2014 voted against
supporting the construction of Northern Gateway. It’s a matter of public
record, Mr. Deputy Speaker. The member from Regina Mount Royal opposes pipelines
so firmly that he’s voted against them twice in this House. The NDP government
in BC has also actively campaigned against a co‑operative approach to our
economy.
To
the member from Saskatoon Silverspring: why has your
party wanted to stop the development of a pipeline to BC?
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Saskatoon Silverspring.
Hugh Gordon: — What would be really great is if this
Premier would release his list of projects so you could prove exactly what
you’re talking about there. It’d sure be great to have that. You know, Mr.
Speaker, we’ve been unequivocal on this side: we approve of building more
pipelines. We want to get our oil and gas to tidewater. And it’d be great to
work collaboratively with other provinces to get it done. Maybe that member
should take a lesson from that.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Saskatoon Westview.
April ChiefCalf: — Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. How does
the member from Canora-Pelly reconcile “a strong economic framework” with
rising food bank usage, decreased spending, and skyrocketing homelessness?
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Canora-Pelly.
Sean Wilson: — Let’s talk about something the NDP know
nothing about: value-added ag. Louis Dreyfus in Yorkton right now, there’s an
expansion of the canola processing complex right just north of the city of
Yorkton. There’s a new pea protein isolate production plant. That’s 120 new
jobs total.
I
have a massive list of all kinds of value-add that’s being provided to this
province, Mr. Speaker. Richardson canola crush plant expansion in Yorkton to
double capacity to 2.2 million metric tons annually. So if you want to
talk to me about any kind of value-add production, it’s right here.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from P.A. Carlton.
Kevin Kasun: — Mr. Deputy Speaker, every day in this
House and on social media, the NDP choose fear over facts on our economy. Fact:
Saskatchewan is posting record-breaking GDP growth. Fact: we have one of the
lowest unemployment rates in Canada. Fact: we rank second in private investment
and wholesale growth.
To
the member from Saskatoon Silverspring: will you
trade fear for facts and acknowledge that our government’s plan is working and
delivering on growth?
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from Saskatoon Silverspring.
Hugh Gordon: — Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Fact:
this government under this Premier has the worst record of economic growth in
the entire country. Fact, Mr. Speaker: their record private investment was due
to one company, thank you very much, and without that investment it would be
zero. So, Mr. Speaker, I don’t think, quite respectfully, that the member knows
what he’s talking about.
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Keith Jorgenson: — Thank you so much, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
My question is for the member from Moose Jaw Wakamow.
Could the member from Moose Jaw Wakamow please tell
us why her government raised the PST from five percentage points to seven
percentage points, increasing the tax burden on the
people of Saskatchewan by 300 per cent?
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from Moose Jaw Wakamow.
Megan
Patterson: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And thank you for the question. So our government
actually implemented $2.5 billion in affordability measures in this last
budget, and we do it each and every year. And actually we also implemented the
largest personal income tax cut in this last budget, and we actually took
54,000 families off of the income tax roll entirely.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Kindersley-Biggar.
[12:30]
Kim Gartner: —
Mr. Deputy Speaker, the NDP stand up in this House and continue to talk down
the investments being made in this province: $20 billion invested at BHP
Jansen potash mine, doubling production at the K+S
mine, two uranium mines approved by this government, a net zero copper mine
under way, doubling of a canola crush plant, expansion to the Louis Dreyfus
plant in Yorkton, construction of the new Cargill plant. These aren’t promises;
they’re projects. They’re proof of a government that’s delivering results.
So, to the member from Saskatoon Silverspring: if you truly believe this isn’t getting the
job done, tell us, what do you say to those choosing to invest in Saskatchewan
right now?
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from Saskatoon Silverspring.
Hugh Gordon: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. And that government had nothing to do with those
investments whatsoever. Even a broken clock, even a broken clock can be right
twice a day, Mr. Speaker.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from Saskatoon
Westview.
April ChiefCalf: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. To the member from Moosomin-Montmartre: does the
member understand “only government in 50 years to lower the standard of
living,” and understand what a strong economic record really means?
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from
Moosomin-Montmartre.
Kevin Weedmark: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. And I thank the member opposite for the
question. Yes, I understand exactly what a strong economic record is. I
understand that Saskatchewan’s strong economy is continuing to grow. I
understand that in 2024 Saskatchewan’s private capital investment was
$14.7 billion, up 17.3 per cent from 2023, ranking first in the country
for growth. And in 2025 private capital investment is expected to increase 10.1
per cent to $16.2 billion, ranking second among provinces.
So yes, Mr. Speaker, I and everyone on
this side of the House understand exactly what strong economic growth looks
like. Thank you.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the
member from Humboldt-Watrous.
Racquel
Hilbert: —
Thank you again. Thank you, Deputy Speaker. The NDP continue to run the economy
down. The MLA for Walsh Acres, in a public realm, has claimed that extracting
oil, I quote, “won’t save us.” And the member from Regina Elphinstone has
claimed that using our resources to invest in services for Saskatchewan people,
I quote, “not a reason to keep pumping oil.”
To the member from Saskatoon Silverspring: do you stand by your colleague’s comments on
our resource sector?
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the
member from Saskatoon Silverspring.
Hugh Gordon: —
Thank you for the question, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It’s unequivocal on this side.
We support the development of our resources. We’ve been calling for more
infrastructure. We’ve been asking for a plan from this government to expand
infrastructure; to get our products to tidewater; to help move our products in
our agricultural industry, our mining industry, our oil and gas industry out of
Saskatchewan to divest away from just a single trading partner. And what plan
have we gotten from this government? Crickets, Mr. Speaker.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the
member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Keith
Jorgenson: —
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. My question is for the member from
Moose Jaw Wakamow. We’ve had 68,000 young people
leave our province for other provinces. If this economic framework is so
successful, why are they driving our young people away?
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the
member from Moose Jaw Wakamow.
Megan
Patterson: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, and thank you for the question. Actually it was
when the NDP were in power that we saw the biggest outward migration in this
province. I was actually one of those people. When I graduated from university,
everyone left the province and so did I. But I came back.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the
member from Martensville-Blairmore.
Hon. Jamie
Martens: —
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. As I’m sure that the members opposite are aware,
Saskatchewan did formerly have rent control legislation. Legislation
. . .
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The 75‑minute
debate period has expired.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by Jared Clarke
that Bill No. 606 — The Provincial Health Authority
(ER Closure right-to-know) Amendment Act
be now read a second time.]
Deputy Speaker B. McLeod: — I recognize the member from Saskatoon Churchill-Wildwood.
Keith
Jorgenson: —
Thank you so much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It’s an absolute pleasure to be on my
feet talking about this. And I want to start off by thanking my friend and
colleague from Regina Walsh Acres for introducing this very important
legislation.
You know, one of the things I wanted to
maybe clear up at the outset is when we ask questions about this in the House,
routinely I hear the Minister of Health routinely say that we’re somehow
opposed to virtual care and point-of-care testing. And I want to set the record
straight. You know, we’re not opposed to these things; we’re opposed to the
reckless use of these things.
You know, my grandmother, when I was a
little kid, told me not to run around with a pair of scissors. And she told me
not to do that, not because she was opposed to scissors, she just thought it
was dangerous to run with them. And you know, there’s nothing wrong with using
a virtual doctor, but implementing them and using it in such a manner where you
put the lives of rural people at risk is simply inappropriate.
So you know, this legislation is
critical at keeping rural folk safe. You know, often when I walk around in this
building, it’s hard not to be continually surrounded by your sort of sense of
history. And we see, you know, our colleagues from the past’s faces on the
wall. And I can’t help but think that a hundred years from today, when somebody
is searching in Hansard and sees that the member from Regina Walsh Acres
introduced this legislation, that they’re not going to be a bit confused and
perplexed as to why anyone in the government would have been in favour of
concealing when hospitals are open and closed from their constituents.
And it really baffles me as to why we
needed to even introduce this legislation. This should be common sense. When a
hospital’s closed you tell the people that it affects.
So when I was at Agribition
the day before yesterday, I stopped by and saw the booth of Highway Hotline.
You know, somebody who’s spent most of their life living in rural Saskatchewan
used Highway Hotline thousands of times. And the person who was demonstrating
it, you know, was . . . The sort of added feature that you can see a plow in real time moving down the highway. And when I was
talking to the person at the booth, and I told them what I did for a living,
that I was an MLA, the person asked me, well why wouldn’t the government do
something like that for hospital closures? And you know, that’s an absolute
excellent question, Mr. Speaker.
You know, this summer and fall we’ve had
over 600 times that hospitals have been closed and 400 times when there’s been
alterations in services. So that’s basically when the hospital door is still
open but not all of the services that would normally be available at the
hospital are available. You know, until about two weeks ago only one — only one
— of those 600 closures was ever posted on the SHA [Saskatchewan Health
Authority] website.
And so my colleague from Regina Walsh
Acres has dragged the government kicking and screaming to the point where
they’re making a half effort to do the right thing, but it’s not nearly enough.
Myself and the member from Regina Walsh Acres have visited over 30 rural
communities affected by this chaos. We’ve done interviews with the media and
talked to countless people. And this is something that is absolutely common
sense.
You know, still to this day, I’ve not
seen one member on the opposite side of the legislature post on their social
media accounts any information about these closures, even though they’re now
put on the SHA website, when in theory this information could be the difference
between somebody living or dying. Yet they choose to tell no one, Mr. Speaker.
It’s absolutely shocking. You know, this government’s response to this
legislation has been to change the very definition of what it means to have a
hospital open, and I’ll come back to that in a second, Mr. Speaker.
So the government has started posting on
the SHA website at 4 p.m. what hospitals are open and closed. The problem, Mr.
Deputy Speaker, is this is largely historical information. It tells people
about closures that are under way or have already happened. This is simply not
sufficient, Mr. Speaker. People need to know in real time when a facility is
closed so they know what direction to drive in in an emergency.
So my kids attended for most of their
school career, a rural school. And you know, as I mentioned Highway Hotline, we
would often consult on a daily basis Highway Hotline to make sure that when we
were putting our kids on the road we knew that they were going to be safe. So I
want to tell you a little bit of a story about one time when my middle
daughter, Lily, was quite badly injured on the farm.
You know, we had a trampoline and it had
blown over in the wind and the guideposts had broken on it. And my kids weren’t
supposed to jump on it, but like a lot of nine-year-old girls, she didn’t
listen to her parents. And she was jumping on the trampoline, and she landed on
a post, one of the guideposts that extended above the trampoline frame. She
landed on that and her leg became impaled on it. And so I remember a
white-knuckled drive with my daughter in a minivan bleeding, going to a
hospital to seek care for her.
And every time I’ve thought about what
the members opposite are doing, besides not paying attention during debates, is
they are putting the lives of rural folk at risk by not telling them. And I
imagine showing up at a hospital with my daughter who’s bleeding in the back of
a minivan only to find a note on the door telling me that the hospital was
closed.
And then if I discovered afterwards, as
her dad, that the Minister of Health had known, had known that that hospital
was closed and chose not to tell me, and I had driven an hour in the wrong
direction, I can’t tell you how angry I would’ve been, Mr. Speaker. So I would
encourage all the members opposite to read the memo that we leaked — or that
was leaked to us — about the change in opening practices at rural hospitals. I
encourage you to read it.
The members opposite almost exclusively
represent rural ridings. And I ask you, after you read that memo from start to
finish and ask yourself, is this what my constituents voted for? Is this what
they want, is for us to conceal and hide whether or not their hospital is open
and whether or not there’s a doctor on service? And I would encourage all the
members opposite to do their job and vote in the best interests of their
constituents and vote for the member from Walsh Acres’s private member’s bill.
With that I move to adjourn debate.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — The member has
moved to adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the
motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried. I
recognize the Government Deputy House Leader.
Hon. Lori Carr: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move that this House do now adjourn.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — It has been
moved that this Assembly do now adjourn. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to
adopt this motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Deputy
Speaker B. McLeod: — Carried. This
Assembly now stands adjourned until Monday at 1:30. Safe travels, everyone. See
you next week.
[The Assembly adjourned at 12:43.]
Published
under the authority of the Hon. Todd Goudy, Speaker
Disclaimer:
The electronic versions of the Legislative Assembly’s documents are provided on
this site for informational purposes only. The Clerk is responsible for the
records of each legislature.