CONTENTS
Huskies
and Roughriders Win Big on the Weekend
Saskatchewan
Welcomes the Grey Cup Back Home
WeyStrong
Supports Women Living with Cancer
Saskatoon
Summer Snack Program Ensures Food Security
Acknowledging
a Dedicated Leader and Nation Builder on Louis Riel Day
Saskatoon
Citizen Serves His Community
Métis
Nation Serves Their Citizens with Drive and Determination
Cost
of Living and Rental Costs
Government
Priorities for Major Infrastructure Projects
Government
Response to Wildfires in the North
Rural
Health Care Staffing and Provision of Emergency Services
Supports
for Ukrainian Post-Secondary Students
Bill
No. 38 — The Building Schools Faster Act

SECOND
SESSION — THIRTIETH LEGISLATURE
of
the
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
DEBATES
AND PROCEEDINGS
(HANSARD)
N.S. Vol. 67 No. 13A Monday, November
17, 2025, 13:30
[Prayers]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Government Relations.
Hon. Eric
Schmalz: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To you and through you, I’d like to welcome a few
guests in your gallery, seated in your gallery, Mr. Speaker, with Métis
Nation-Saskatchewan. We have Minister Brennan Merasty, Minister Darcy Lepowick,
CEO [chief executive officer] Richard Quintal, and Minister Friesen, I believe.
That’s correct? Yes. Thank you. That was a good guess because they forgot to
tell me who was here. Also seated with them is our former MLA [Member of the
Legislative Assembly] Paul Merriman as well is here, Mr. Speaker.
The Métis people have made rich and
lasting contributions to our province, Mr. Speaker, through history, culture,
and the development of our province as a whole. Mr. Speaker, as one of the
province’s founding peoples, the Métis have helped shape Saskatchewan into what
it is today. Mr. Speaker, through their unique cultural traditions, ongoing
contributions to community building, arts, language, and economic growth, their
resilience, knowledge, and cultural vibrancy continue to strengthen
Saskatchewan today.
So to you and through you, Mr. Speaker,
I ask all members to welcome members from Métis Nation-Saskatchewan to their
legislature.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Cumberland.
Jordan McPhail: — Well thank you,
Mr. Speaker. I too want to join with the minister in welcoming the leadership
here from Métis Nation-Saskatchewan. I’ve got to know a few of them over some
time. As well my seatmate here, I believe, used to teach one of the new
ministers there. So she keeps her seatmate in line just as much as she did as a
teacher of Minister Brennan Merasty.
I also want to welcome Marg Friesen and
Darcy Lepowick, who I had the honour and opportunity to meet with early last
week in issues facing his community as well. And I thank these folks for the
leadership that they provide to their constituents, bringing in the importance
of culture and language into the province of Saskatchewan — and such a rich
culture and language here in Saskatchewan — as well, the leadership from the
staff of Richard Quintal and Autumn Laing-LaRose.
I welcome them to this, their provincial
legislature on behalf of the official opposition. And I ask all members to join
me in welcoming them to this, their provincial legislature. Thank you so much.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Weyburn-Bengough.
Michael Weger: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. To you and through you, I’d like to introduce four board members from
WeyStrong, a Weyburn non-profit organization that I’ll have more to say about
in a member statement. So, Mr. Speaker, up in your gallery in the back row we
have president Lisa Vick, secretary Deana Peterson, treasurer Peggy Henderson,
and member at large Krystal Browatzke.
These four women, and their fellow board
members that couldn’t be here, are making a significant impact in their
community. And I would ask all members to join me in thanking them for their
amazing efforts and to also welcome them to this, their Legislative Assembly.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Pasqua.
Bhajan Brar: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Mr. Speaker, in the east gallery there are my immediate family members
and extended family members. Mr. Pritam Singh Sidhu is the father-in-law of my
daughter. He always remained with me while door knocking, while delivering any leaflets.
And even by making . . . [inaudible] . . . he was always
with me, stood with me. He’s my right arm.
And with him is Mr. Patinder Singh Brar.
He and his wife came to Canada as visitors to . . . marry their son.
And along with Dial Singh, he is my brother’s brother-in-law. And then my
brother’s daughter-in-law, Raman Deep Brar; and Charneet Brar, wife of
Patinder; and Harbans Kaur, wife of Dial Singh; and my daughter Kuldeep. And
Charanjit, my wife — we’re married more than 50 years together and will remain
as such.
So I would like to introduce them, and I
would like to request you to join me to welcome them to their Legislative
Assembly.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Advanced Education.
Hon. Ken
Cheveldayoff: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. My voice is a little raspy for some obvious
reasons yesterday, but I’ll make it through.
Today we have the pleasure of
introducing, and no stranger to this legislature, a community leader in
Saskatoon and a philanthropist throughout the province. Curtis Kimpton joins us
here today. Curtis has won national awards with the Kinsmen Foundation. He’s an
honorary colonel with the Canadian Armed Forces. Members on both sides of the
House will have seen him at the Remembrance Day services in Saskatoon. He’s
also with Advocis, the financial planners advocacy group, and he’s in town
today doing some of that.
It won’t be long before TeleMiracle is
around, and Curtis takes great pride in showing behind-the-scenes operations to
members on both sides of the House. He’s a very busy man. But he also is my
co-campaign manager from the last election, so I hope he doesn’t get too busy
doing other things because we’ll need to win Saskatoon Willowgrove again.
Mr. Speaker, through you to all
colleagues, thank Curtis for coming to his legislature today and all that he
does each and every day in our province.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Southeast.
Brittney
Senger: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I would like to rise and join my colleague
across from me here to recognize Mr. Curtis Kimpton to his Legislative Assembly
today.
I had the pleasure of meeting Curtis
about a year ago actually at the Saskatoon Community Foundation, their annual
gathering, where I learned about the incredible work and connection that he has
to the community, all of the different phenomenal community-based organizations
that he is involved with, and his passion for improving the lives of everybody
in Saskatoon and across Saskatchewan.
I’d like to ask all members in joining
me to welcome Curtis Kimpton to his Legislative Assembly.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Yorkton.
David Chan: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. I would like to welcome a personal friend of mine and someone who also
lives in my constituency, Darcy Lepowick. He’s here on behalf of Métis Nation
of Saskatchewan, but I’ve known him for quite a few years now, from before
either of us started into this political field. I also worked with his wife who
works with YTC Justice [Yorkton Tribal Council Justice] in Yorkton.
And what some of you might not know is
that Darcy runs the best elk farm in the area. And if you ever want the best
tallow, this is the guy to go to for that. So please help me in welcoming Darcy
Lepowick to his Legislative Assembly.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara Conway: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. I’d like to join with the member from Weyburn-Bengough and also
welcome, on behalf of the official opposition, the women that are here on
behalf of WeyStrong today. I’m looking forward to hearing more about this
organization; I understand it’s an organization that exists in Weyburn. One of
the organizers, Lisa Vick, I understand had a diagnosis of breast cancer, saw a
need in the community for additional supports for women with that diagnosis.
And I want to thank these women who are
here today, as well as those that they’re representing who couldn’t make it,
for the work they’re doing to provide supports in that community. And I look
forward to hearing more about their good work in the member statement that I
understand is coming later today.
So I’d ask all members to join me in
welcoming this crew from WeyStrong. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Agriculture.
Hon. Daryl Harrison: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. If I may, in your gallery I’d like to reintroduce Deana Peterson. She
married a local Alida boy, and we worked together in the oil and gas industry
for several years before she dragged him to her home community of Weyburn. So I
will forgive her, but I’d like to welcome her to her Legislative Assembly.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Silverspring.
Hugh Gordon: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. It’s a pleasure and honour to rise here today. I would like to point
out in your gallery Mr. Paul Merriman, the former MLA for Saskatoon
Silverspring. Served in this legislature since 2011 in the riding of Saskatoon
Sutherland. Served in many roles on the other side as a minister of Health and
minister of Public Safety.
I just wanted to say it’s not an easy
job to undertake life in politics. Mr. Merriman served well in this House and
in this Assembly and worked tirelessly for the people of this province.
And so I ask all members of this
Assembly to thank him and welcome him to his Legislative Assembly. Thank you
very much.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Stonebridge.
Darcy
Warrington: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It gives me great pleasure to introduce to everyone —
he almost needs no introduction — Rashid Ahmed and his family: Virdah,
Michelle, and Minel. Over the last year or so he’s generously invited me and so
many others, potentially from both sides of the aisle, into their home and has
shown great kindness towards so many in our province and in Saskatoon in
particular.
His work with Multifaith Saskatoon, he
is the president, trying to bring harmony and mutual respect throughout
different faith organizations, focusing on how all faiths share goals in peace
and unity. His work with the Muslim community in Saskatoon, with Egadz,
Salvation Army for clothing drives, serving food through Meals on Wheels, and
blood drives, is so admirable.
And it gives me great pleasure on behalf
of the official opposition to welcome him and his family into this their
Legislative Assembly.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon
University-Sutherland.
Tajinder
Grewal: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I join the member from Saskatoon Stonebridge to welcome
Rashid Ahmed and Virdah to your legislature. And Rashid is a friend of mine for
the last 15 years. In Saskatoon if you go to 100 community events, you’ll find
him at more than 90 events. He’s very active in various communities. And in his
religion, Ahmadiyya Jama’at, their motto is love for all, hate for none. And he
is a true example of that motto. He loves for all and hates for none. I ask all
the members to join me to welcome Rashid and Virdah to their legislature.
And while I’m
on my feet, Mr. Speaker, I also want to join the member from Regina Pasqua to welcome
his extended family to their legislature. Welcome. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Pasqua.
Bhajan Brar: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I rise here today to present a petition in the
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan to implement rent control amount.
We, the undersigned residents of the
province of Saskatchewan, wish to bring to your attention the following: that
Saskatchewan tenants are currently experiencing the highest levels of rent
increase in the country; the rent in Saskatchewan has risen by 4 per cent in
the last year alone, far outpacing wage growth and putting more pressure on
families, seniors, students, and low-income residents; that without rent
control, landlords can implement unchecked rent hikes, making housing
increasingly unaffordable and unstable; that with rent control, residents can
budget more effectively, potentially putting them in a position to save for a
down payment on their first home; that provinces such as British Columbia,
Manitoba, Ontario, and Prince Edward Island have already implemented rent
control measures to protect tenants and maintain housing affordability.
We, in the prayer
that reads as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan call on the Government of Saskatchewan to adopt fair and effective
rent control legislation that limits annual rent increases, ensuring housing stability
and protect tenants from being priced out of their homes.
This petition has been signed by the
residents of Regina. I do so present. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the member from Regina
Northeast.
[13:45]
Jacqueline
Roy: — Merci, monsieur le Président.
[Translation:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.]
I rise to present a petition to the
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
to immediately reimburse Regina taxpayers for the Costco deal. The undersigned
residents wish to bring to your attention that the city of Regina had to offer
a $6.78 million incentive package to keep Costco at the original proposed
location in Regina because the province attempted to outbid them. This comes at
a time where that additional $6.78 million cost will hit taxpayers in the
same year that they were hit with the largest tax increase in over a decade.
With that, I
will read the prayer:
We, in the prayer reads as follows, respectfully request that the
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan call on the Government of Saskatchewan to
immediately reimburse Regina taxpayers for this Costco deal.
The
undersigned residents live in Regina. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the member from Regina Wascana
Plains.
Brent Blakley: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise to present a
petition calling on the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan to address the
child care crisis. These residents of the province of Saskatchewan wish to
bring attention to the following: that renewing a $10‑a-day child care
deal is necessary for children, their families, and child care providers; that
the $10‑a-day child care deal serves as a critical infrastructure vital
to our economy; that the creation of an equitable funding formula and a
recruitment and retention program are necessary to address the crisis in our
child care system; that educators deserve a salary grid and a pension and
benefit program that recognizes experience and education; and that child care
centres impacted by the delay in getting a federal-provincial deal and the
existing equitable funding formula require emergency funding to contribute current
operations.
The prayer
reads as follows:
We respectfully request the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan
call on the Government of Saskatchewan to immediately collaborate with child
care stakeholders to address the challenges of funding and the recruitment and
retention of early child care educators, and immediately sign the $10‑a-day
child care deal.
Mr. Speaker, the signatories today rise in
Regina. I do so present.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Riversdale.
Kim Breckner: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. I rise today to present a petition calling for the Government of
Saskatchewan to fix the crisis in health care.
The undersigned residents would like to
bring to our attention the following: that in the past five years the health
care closures across rural Saskatchewan disrupted services for a total of 8,613
days; that 3,953 of those days were disruptions to Saskatchewan emergency
rooms; that for the first time, an emergency room in one of our major cities
was shut down due to staff shortages; and that it is unacceptable that women in
this province are being forced to travel out of province for routine breast
cancer diagnostic care.
With that, I’ll read the prayer:
We, in the prayer that follows,
respectfully request the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan to call on the Government
of Saskatchewan to immediately address the short-staffing crisis in health care
and work with health care workers on solutions to improve patient care.
The
signatories to this petition reside in Saskatoon. I do so submit.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Saskatoon Westview.
April ChiefCalf: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. I rise in the Legislative Assembly today to present the following
petition calling on the Government of Saskatchewan to step up for Indigenous
students.
The undersigned residents of the
province of Saskatchewan wish to bring to your attention the following: that
Jordan’s principle was established to ensure that First Nations children have
equitable access to the services, including supports in schools; the recent
loss of this federal funding leaves a significant gap in Saskatchewan
classrooms, especially for Indigenous students who rely on inclusive education
supports; cuts to Jordan’s principle funding have led to the layoff of 80
educational assistants from Saskatoon public schools; and the 2025‑2026
provincial budget further reduces education funding, budgeting less than what
was actually spent the previous year.
And with that, Mr. Speaker, I will read
the prayer:
We, in the prayer
that reads as follows, respectfully request that the Legislative Assembly of
Saskatchewan stand up for Saskatchewan and advocate for the restoration of
federal Jordan’s principle funding to support Indigenous students in schools;
commit to sustainable, predictable, and equitable provincial funding for
inclusive education across Saskatchewan; and ensure education support workers
have the resources and staffing they need to keep classrooms safe and support
every student’s learning journey.
Mr. Speaker, the signatories to this
petition reside in Meadow Lake, Lloydminster, and Melfort. I do so present,
thank you.
Speaker Goudy:
— I recognize the member from Moosomin-Montmartre.
Kevin Weedmark: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. What a weekend for football
in Saskatchewan.
On Saturday,
the University of Saskatchewan Huskies fought their way to a 22 to 11 Mitchell
Bowl victory, earning their place in the Vanier Cup coming up this weekend in
Regina. Their grit and their refusal to quit showed the country what
Saskatchewan pride is all about.
And the next
day, Mr. Speaker, on Sunday, the Saskatchewan Roughriders and their fans
marched into Winnipeg and defeated the Montreal Alouettes 25 to 17 to bring the
Grey Cup home to Saskatchewan where it belongs. Mr.
Speaker, I was there in Winnipeg last night, along with thousands of the best
fans of the world, for that incredible game as Saskatchewan turned Bomber
territory into a sea of green. And it was so exciting to be there as the Riders
once again proved that when we come together, we can take on anyone anywhere.
Football is more than a game. It’s
community, perseverance, and pride in where we come from. Now I can’t help but
point out the Riders never managed to win a Grey Cup when the NDP [New
Democratic Party] members opposite were in charge of the province. But since
this government took office, Mr. Speaker, Rider nation has hoisted the cup not
once, not twice, but three times. It seems that either on or off the field,
Saskatchewan wins when the right team is leading the charge.
I want to ask the entire Assembly to
join me in congratulating both the Huskies and the Riders, their coaches, and
every fan, every member of Rider nation, and everyone involved in making this
happen. Let’s celebrate this amazing Grey Cup victory. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Mount Royal.
Trent
Wotherspoon: —
Mr. Speaker, what a team, what a night. Our Saskatchewan Roughriders are Grey
Cup champions — our fifth championship — with a thrilling 25‑17 victory
over the Montreal Alouettes in the 112th Grey Cup.
But this celebration extends far beyond
the final score. Across Saskatchewan families, friends, and neighbours gathered
together to cheer on the green and white, demonstrating once again how our
Riders unite our province with hope and pride. From our largest cities to our
smallest towns, farms, and on First Nations, Rider nation stood together.
Our team showed heart and grit all night
in that game. The defence forced key turnovers and veteran QB [quarterback]
Trevor Harris ran the offence with poise. Harris threw for 302 yards and set a
Grey Cup record for the best completion percentage, at 85.2 at 39 years old, a
very well-deserved MVP [most valuable player]. And A.J. Ouellette ran roughshod
over their D [defence].
This win is sweet, Mr. Speaker. The
prairies erupted with joy, green confetti rained down, fireworks lit up the
sky, and thousands poured onto the Green Mile in a sea of green and white.
Congratulations to our Roughriders, champs once again, and Rider nation legends
forever. Welcome home to the Grey Cup.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Weyburn-Bengough.
Michael Weger: — WeyStrong is a
non-profit organization based out of Weyburn that was created to address the
critical gap in support for women living with cancer in the city of Weyburn and
surrounding communities. The WeyStrong community has grown very quickly and
came together with their first retreat in 2024.
Following the first retreat, the
organization has been busy with a variety of activities, including educating
the public about the mobile breast cancer screening program, hosting its first
Bunco fundraiser, hosting a Chuck-a-Puck fundraiser at the Weyburn Redwings
game, a summer fun raffle, and a guest presentation at the Ceylon United Church
Ladies Night, handing out treat bags at the Weyburn car show, and applying for
and receiving a $3,000 cheque from the Weyburn Credit Union Community Fund,
which will be used to purchase an additional IV [intravenous] start cart for
the oncology unit at the Weyburn General Hospital.
Last month WeyStrong hosted its second
cancer support retreat in Weyburn, this time with 42 women participating from
Weyburn and area. The retreat was open to any woman who has ever received a
cancer diagnosis, regardless of age, background, or type of cancer.
This year’s retreat included a nutrition
session, a genetic counselling session, a peaceful sound bath therapy session,
a stretching and breath work exercise including mini massages, and a meaningful
art session. Thanks to the incredibly generous community and the individual
sponsors and donors, the entire retreat was provided free of charge to all
attendees.
I’d like to congratulate the workers on
their great job with WeyStrong. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Westview.
April
ChiefCalf: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, this past summer I had the opportunity to
volunteer in the Saskatoon and District Labour Council Summer Snack Program.
The Summer Snack Program was created in
1988 by two local teachers who understood that children need access to
nutritious lunches during the summer months as well as during the school year.
Working with the Saskatoon and District Labour Council, they have been able to
bridge that gap during the summer holidays.
Through this program, staff and
volunteers provide lunches to six core neighbourhoods in Saskatoon parks and
other locations. The program provides fruit, vegetables, cheese, milk, yogourt,
juice, and sandwiches.
I, along with several of my colleagues,
took shifts over one week in August, volunteering in neighbourhoods on the west
side of Saskatoon, including in Archibald McDonald Park in the community of
Massey Place, which is in my constituency of Saskatoon Westview. Mr. Speaker,
we noticed that many adults also gathered to partake in the program,
highlighting a situation of growing food insecurity in our province.
Mr. Speaker, I ask all members of the
Saskatchewan Legislative Assembly to join me today in thanking the Saskatoon
and District Labour Council for their successful and essential Summer Snack
Program. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Batoche.
Darlene Rowden: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Good afternoon, fellow members of the legislature, special guests, and
representatives from the Métis Nation government in Saskatchewan. As a
democratically elected politician, Louis Riel was a dedicated leader and nation
builder. Elected multiple times, he was never able to assume his seat in
Ottawa, but we are here today to acknowledge his contributions. He declared a
provisional government of Saskatchewan at Batoche. It was there that he made
his last stand.
We recognize the contribution of his
vision, his beliefs, and his steadfast fight for the rights and recognition of
Métis in our province and country that continues to this day. His struggle to
have his vision realized does not go unnoticed today by people across Canada.
We pay our respects to his role
politically, his dedication to all Métis, and his want for a country that gave
equal representation to all. Thank you, President McCallum, for you and your
leaders’ presence in our Chambers today. We acknowledge this, Louis Riel Day,
and hope to move forward in partnership with Métis citizens in Saskatchewan.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Stonebridge.
Darcy
Warrington: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Today we celebrate an extraordinary citizen of
Saskatoon Stonebridge, Rashid Ahmed. Rashid became a proud Canadian in December
of 2017, and since then has worked tirelessly to give back to the place he now
calls home.
Professionally, Rashid is an
accomplished human resources leader, known for his integrity, motivation, and
interpersonal skills. His record is inspiring: recipient of the Vera Pezer
Award for Student Enhancement and volunteerism, nominee for the Outstanding
Student Award from the Edwards Business Students’ Society, and nominee for the
Innovation Award at the Ministry of Highways. He also helped establish the
Edwards International Students’ Society at the U of S [University of
Saskatchewan].
Behind all these accomplishments lies a
story of love, patience, and faith. For years Rashid and wife, Virdah, were
separated by borders and circumstances. “I kept praying that my wife would be
here soon,” he once said. After years apart, enduring political barriers and
the challenges of a pandemic, that prayer was answered. Virdah and daughter
Michelle arrived safely in Saskatoon, reuniting a family that had waited too
long to be together.
Today Rashid continues to serve his
community with strength, empathy, and gratitude. His story reminds us that
perseverance and love can indeed overcome any distance, and his faith guides
his selfless care and kindness to everyone, a faith commitment that should
guide us all — love for all, hatred for none.
[14:00]
Please join me in recognizing Rashid
Ahmed.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Carrot River Valley.
Terri Bromm: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker, for this opportunity to build upon what my colleague from Batoche has
touched.
In keeping with Louis Riel’s spirit and
drive, Métis people have demonstrated determination and drive to achieve the
dream they set out to accomplish. It’s clear the Métis contribution to our
country and our province is today undeniable. The leadership of the Métis
Nation-Saskatchewan has demonstrated a clear path forward, a strong commitment
to self-determination, its citizens, and their well-being.
As a result, the national auditors at
MNP found the Métis Nation-Saskatchewan has increased its citizenship to more
than 30,000 and is producing an estimated $209 million in economic
activity and is supporting over 1,500 jobs. Métis Nation-Saskatchewan provides
important and meaningful programs and services to its citizens.
Métis citizens should be proud of the
impacts made in building a strong economy, strong communities, and strong
families. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I recognize the Deputy Leader of the
Opposition.
Vicki Mowat: — Mr. Speaker, after
18 years of this tired and out-of-touch government, Saskatchewan people are at
a breaking point. People can’t keep up with the cost of living. Rent in this
province has increased every month for 40 consecutive months. Almost every month
Saskatchewan leads the nation in rent increases, 24 per cent higher over the
last two years.
Why is the Sask Party doing nothing to
help people with the cost of living and the cost of rent?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Deputy Premier.
Hon. Jim
Reiter: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the opposition has been advocating for
rent controls for some time now. We’ve debated that on the floor of this
Assembly before. Our government believes that in virtually every case across
the country, around the world, when rent controls are put in place the opposite
happens. What happens is investment dries up, less housing starts are made, and
the opposite of what’s tried to be attempted happens, Mr. Speaker.
There’s a number . . . On the
affordability measures, Mr. Speaker, we’ve debated that too. I’d be happy to
have more questions on that.
Mr. Speaker, this past weekend the
Premier had an opportunity to meet with the Prime Minister. I understand the
meeting went well, Mr. Speaker. This morning, I guess it was, the Premier also
joined a virtual meeting of all the premiers and the Prime Minister. And then
he jumped on a plane to go to Washington. Tariffs are having a huge impact I
think on CPI [consumer price index] and affordability. We not only have the
best football team in the country, Mr. Speaker, we have the best premier in the
country.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Deputy Leader of the Opposition.
Vicki Mowat: — Mr. Speaker, that
answer was all over the place. This government is failing to deliver when it
comes to cost of living.
And they’re failing when it comes to
delivering big game-changing projects to create good jobs. The Prime Minister
released the latest round of major nation-building projects for approval, and
there was nothing for Saskatchewan. This government has refused to release
their list of what they’re asking for.
Why has the Sask Party failed to get
results on these major projects that matter for our province?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Deputy Premier.
Hon. Jim
Reiter: —
Mr. Speaker, the member opposite is right. The answer was all over the place
because the question was all over the place. It was on rent control. It was on
affordability. It was on major projects. It was all over the place, Mr.
Speaker.
Now that she’s narrowed it down, Mr.
Speaker, happy to talk about major projects. The Premier answered this question
in the House last week I believe it was, Mr. Speaker, where he talked about the
major projects that our government supports are all the ones that have a
regulatory touch from the federal government. They’re projects that have . . .
for example, port access, projects that are going to open opportunities for
Europe markets, Asian markets.
And the member says that no projects are
going ahead in the province, Mr. Speaker. We’re not totally reliant on the
federal government. We have a history of private investment in this province.
Right now, what about the Louis Dreyfus expansion of the canola processing
complex in Yorkton? The Cargill one in Yorkton? Mr. Speaker, the list goes on.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Deputy Leader of the Opposition.
Vicki Mowat: — We don’t know
which projects they’re bringing forward to the federal government, Mr. Speaker,
because they won’t release that list.
Mr. Speaker, the devastation across
northern Saskatchewan this summer was unlike anything we’ve ever seen. The Sask
Party has failed the people impacted by the wildfires time and time again. Now
we have proof, in the form of bills, that this government is charging wildfire
victims tens of thousands of dollars in PST [provincial sales tax] per
household to rebuild their homes and get their lives back. As one Denare Beach
resident said, “They’re profiting off our ashes and memories.”
How does this government justify
profiting off of the pain of wildfire victims?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Policing, Corrections, and
Public Safety.
Hon. Tim
McLeod: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. And of course the forest fire season was an
unprecedented season this summer, and so too were the supports that this
government put in place for the victims of those forest fires, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, we increased the per diem
amounts for the evacuees. We established the recovery task team that’s put over
$20 million into the recovery efforts primarily focusing on the people of
Denare Beach, making sure that everyone who suffered a loss in that community
not only had an unprecedented time of cleanup — all of those lots have now been
cleaned up and restored to a construction-ready phase — but we also included
supports for those families to make sure that everybody has a roof over their
head as we approach the winter. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Cumberland.
Jordan McPhail: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Nothing says supporting wildfire victims like sending them a 10‑
to 20‑ to 30‑thousand-dollar bill for PST. Shame on this minister.
I can’t believe this. First they fail to protect northern communities, then
they fail to support the evacuees. Water bombers grounded, chaos at every turn,
where luckily someone was not killed. And now the government is looking to take
millions of dollars out of the pockets of my constituents who lost their homes.
Can the Premier tell us the exact dollar
figure he will charge the people of the North as they begin to rebuild their
lives?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Policing, Corrections, and
Public Safety.
Hon. Tim
McLeod: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. And I thank the member opposite for the
question because it gives me an opportunity to correct the record on something
that he’s been saying repeatedly. He talks about grounded airplanes. Yes, there
were water bombers that were under repair, Mr. Speaker, over the summer. But he
fails to recognize the fact that we called in an unprecedented number of
replacement bombers to help fight those forest fires, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, the comments that are being
made, constantly requiring correction of the record. We have implemented
unprecedented supports for the people who have suffered tragic loss. And we
will not exploit those people, Mr. Speaker, as they experienced that tragedy.
Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Cumberland.
Jordan McPhail: — Well, Mr. Speaker,
I guess I wouldn’t know what the exact term of sending a 10‑ to 20‑
to 30‑thousand-dollar bill would be, but maybe the minister said it in
his response to my first question there.
Mr. Speaker, I’ve got the proof of this
government’s cruelty here today. Harley Vliegenthart, one of the heroic
volunteer firefighters who tried to defend Denare Beach without any help from
this government, told me his PST bill is more than $28,000.
Nathan Pitka and his family lived in
East Trout Lake for 50 years. He provided a PST bill for $25,000. Nathan asked
yesterday, “Why would the government profit off of such a tragedy that cost
people so much?” That’s a great question.
So my question to the minister: why?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Policing, Corrections, and
Public Safety.
Hon. Tim
McLeod: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. And as I indicated in my previous answer, we
have unprecedented supports set out for the support of the individuals who have
suffered from the forest fires, Mr. Speaker. And, Mr. Speaker . . .
[Interjections]
Speaker
Goudy: — I’m just going to ask . . .
And actually when I was standing, you’re making comments on . . . So
I would just ask that both sides listen to the questions and to the answers.
Minister.
Hon. Tim
McLeod: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. The supports that we put in place through the
recovery task team are there specifically for the individuals who did not have
insurance coverage, Mr. Speaker. When we replace properties that were damaged
due to forest fires, of course the insurance that is in place for those
individuals kicks in first, and then as I said, unprecedented supports — $20 million
of support from this government supporting those families. We will continue to
support those families and the communities that suffered losses as a result of
these tragic fires.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Cumberland.
Jordan McPhail: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. I want the people of the North to know that when I asked that
question, that minister had nothing to do but smile at me from across this
floor.
Mr. Speaker, I am joined today in this
legislature by Donna and Jean Champagne, who lost their home in Denare Beach in
the fires. They are in Moose Jaw now and wondering if they will ever return
home. The mismanagement of the wildfire crisis by this Sask Party government
was the final straw. They don’t know if it’s worth going back. They’re looking
for a commitment that this government will support a proper rebuild and proper
access to the critical services like health care.
Will the Minister of Public Safety sit
down with the Champagnes to hear directly from them after question period
today, yes or no?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Policing, Corrections, and
Public Safety.
Hon. Tim
McLeod: —
Absolutely, Mr. Speaker. I’m happy to sit down and speak with anyone who’s
prepared to talk about their experience, and I welcome these individuals to
their Legislative Assembly, Mr. Speaker. Would be happy to meet with them after
question period to hear what they have to say. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Walsh Acres.
Jared Clarke: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Mr. Speaker, CUPE [Canadian Union of Public Employees] 5430 represents
more than 14,000 front-line health care workers in Saskatchewan, and today they
confirmed what we have been saying all along.
Front-line health care workers were not
consulted about the dangerous new emergency room policy imposed by the Sask
Party government that will see just one registered nurse on site. That’s one RN
[registered nurse] to care for patients, perform tests, to consult with
physicians, and so much more. Frankly this is not health care, and it’s going
to get someone killed.
Can the minister tell this House how
many front-line health care workers he consulted on this policy change? Is the
answer zero?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Jeremy
Cockrill: —
Well, Mr. Speaker, this policy has been in place since 2011, so I can’t speak
to consultation that occurred back in 2010 or 2011. But I would point the
member back to the policy that, as I said in this House last week, Mr. Speaker,
has been in place since 2011.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Walsh Acres.
Jared Clarke: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. The minister clearly has dug in his heels. He claims the memo issued
on October 25th is nothing new. But the front-line health care workers that
we’ve talked to say it is, and they didn’t have a clue that it was coming.
So will the minister table in this House
today the memo sent out by the Saskatchewan Health Authority and let the people
of Saskatchewan decide for themselves?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Jeremy
Cockrill: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I feel the need again to remind the members opposite
that this policy has been in place for 14 years, Mr. Speaker, since 2011.
The focus of myself and this government
continues on ensuring that we’re putting patients first and ensuring that care
is available to them when and where they need it as close to home as possible,
Mr. Speaker. That is why we’ve introduced innovations such as the point-of-care
testing, the virtual physician program, to reduce service disruptions and to
ensure that people in rural Saskatchewan have the best possible access to
health care.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Walsh Acres.
Jared Clarke: — Mr. Speaker, he
says there’s nothing new here to see, but he won’t actually table the memo that
came out on October 25th. Now CUPE 5430 president, Bashir Jalloh, said that the
dangerous new Sask Party policy “creates the illusion of access to care while
putting patients at risk.”
The Premier’s Health minister wants to
give Saskatchewan people the illusion that he’s fixing the health care crisis
rather than actually fixing health care. Is this the Premier’s vision of rural
health care in this province?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Health.
[14:15]
Hon. Jeremy
Cockrill: —
I can tell you, Mr. Speaker, the Premier’s vision and the vision of myself and
this government is a health care system where we are using innovations to
improve care for people whether they live in urban Saskatchewan or rural
Saskatchewan. A vision, Mr. Speaker, that the members opposite now have voted
against at every single opportunity: voted against the virtual physician
program, voted against point-of-care testing, voted time and time again against
the most ambitious health human resources action plan in the country. That’s
what we’re working on.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara Conway: — Mr. Speaker, only
this government would say, one overworked nurse is the best we can do, and then
call it innovation. I’m sorry.
Mr. Speaker, rural ERs [emergency room]
are shutting down at an alarming rate under the Sask Party’s watch, but the
loss of emergency care in rural Saskatchewan is just part of wider failures
underseen by this government. Because whether you’re in Kipling, Macoun, Moose
Jaw, or Regina, it is getting harder than ever to find a family doctor.
In two weeks, here in Regina, the
Gardens Community Health Clinic will be forced to close due to lack of doctors.
They’ve had two family physician positions posted for more than 11 months, Mr.
Speaker. But after 18 years of the Sask Party government running down our
health care system, this clinic could not find or keep any family doctors.
Friday I challenged that Health minister to come up with a plan by today for
those 5,000 Regina residents who will find themselves without access to a
family doctor in just 13 days.
So to the minister: what is the plan?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Jeremy
Cockrill: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I feel the need to emphasize that the Gardens Community
Health Centre in Regina is an independent physician-run clinic not operated by
the Saskatchewan Health Authority. Decisions around hiring or closures, Mr.
Speaker, that lies with that — again — independently run clinic.
Mr. Speaker, the member opposite always
asks about the plan, and in lieu of actually bringing a plan forward. I have to
always point her and other members opposite back to the health human resources
action plan, the most ambitious in the country. When it comes to recruiting
physicians, we have one of the most competitive compensation structures for
physicians in English-speaking Canada. We’re proud of that. We’re recruiting
right across the world, Mr. Speaker. And we’re going to continue to do so.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Elphinstone-Centre.
Meara Conway: — No plan, Mr.
Speaker — nothing for these 5,000 Regina residents who will find themselves
without a family doctor — from that minister who, I might add, campaigned in
2024 on finding a family doctor for every single Saskatchewan resident by 2028.
He ran on that platform. So much for the most ambitious health human resources
plan in Saskatchewan. Apparently it’s the most fictitious, Mr. Speaker.
Just five years ago, just five years ago
the Sask Party called Gardens the future of . . . This isn’t just any
private clinic, opposite to what the minister says. They called it the future
of primary care in Saskatchewan. They poured over $20 million into this
clinic, building capacity there. And now this minister stands and says, we’ve
tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas. Now they quietly watch as it just
shuts down.
So when we ask this Health minister,
what is his plan for these 5,000 people who will find themselves without access
to primary care, is his best answer really absolutely nothing?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Jeremy
Cockrill: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We’re proud of the packages that are available to
physicians, whether they be family physicians or specialists anywhere in the
province, Mr. Speaker.
I’ll reiterate again: we have some of
the most competitive physician compensation in English-speaking Canada today.
That’s why when we go on recruitment missions to the United Kingdom and Ireland
and other countries around the world, Mr. Speaker, there are people interested
and looking seriously at coming to Saskatchewan. We’ve enhanced this with our
last agreement with the Saskatchewan Medical Association, specifically through
the Innovation Fund to support fee-for-service clinics around the province, Mr.
Speaker.
But, Mr. Speaker, I’ll also point to the
announcement that I was able to make earlier this morning, announcing the first
independent nurse practitioner contract, right here in Saskatchewan, we signed
with 19 nurse practitioners. Because again, Mr. Speaker, primary care is not
just provided by family physicians. It can also be provided by nurse
practitioners and many other professionals.
We’re proud of this, Mr. Speaker. We’re
going to continue working on this to make sure that everybody has access to a
primary care provider by 2028.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon
University-Sutherland.
Tajinder
Grewal: —
Mr. Speaker, this government won’t take accountability on health care just like
they won’t take accountability for cutting the critical tuition program offered
to Ukrainian students to build a life in Saskatchewan. That’s what we can
expect after 18 years of Sask Party government, Mr. Speaker.
These Ukrainian students are fleeing
their war-torn country. They are choosing to attend post-secondary schools in
Saskatchewan. Will this minister reverse his decision to cut Ukrainian tuition
programs, or admit he’s responsible for the elimination of this program?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Advanced Education.
Hon. Ken
Cheveldayoff: —
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I respect the right of the
opposition to bring up questions as long as they’re within form in this House,
but I am very disappointed that they are using this venue to scare Ukrainian
students. There have been no cuts, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, make no mistake about it:
members in this House know, or should know, that nobody has done more for
displaced Ukrainians across the world than this government, this country, and
this province.
It was this Premier, this minister now
of CIC [Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan] who was minister of
Economic Development that arranged for more flights from Ukraine to
Saskatchewan than anywhere else in the world, Mr. Speaker. There were members
on this side, there were members on your side of the House that welcomed these
Ukrainian people to the province.
Back in 2023 my predecessor, Gord Wyant,
the Minister of Advanced Education at the time announced a program that was
leading the country, Mr. Speaker, and we continue to have that program in place
today.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon
University-Sutherland.
Tajinder
Grewal: —
Until March. Mr. Speaker, students enrolled in the program received letters
stating that provincial funding would cease after the current winter semester.
That minister could reverse this cut and support these students today. He’s the
minister responsible.
Ivan Teteria, a student affected by
these cuts said, and I quote, “I came here to build a bright future, but I
don’t know what my future holds if this program is not saved.”
Do the right thing. Will that minister
reverse the cuts today?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Advanced Education.
Hon. Ken
Cheveldayoff: —
Mr. Speaker, again I’m disappointed in the opposition and their theatrics,
appearing before my constituency office, heightening things that have no basis
in fact.
Earlier today I talked to a member of
SURAC, the Saskatchewan-Ukraine relations advisory committee. That committee
was started under Premier Romanow. It was resurrected and certainly heightened
in 2008 by Premier Wall and Ken Krawetz and others, Mr. Speaker. This is a
group that will be joining the Ukrainian Canadian Congress and Ukrainians from
across Saskatchewan in recognizing Holodomor tomorrow.
I know why these questions are coming
today. I know what’s happening tomorrow. You bet I’m the minister. I will take
responsibility. I will have discussions with SURAC. I will have discussions
with the Ukrainian Canadian Congress. And we will ensure that all Ukrainians,
and especially Ukrainian students, are treated very, very well.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon
University-Sutherland.
Tajinder
Grewal: —
Mr. Speaker, that minister has the power to fund tuition relief for Ukrainian
students attending post-secondary schools in Saskatchewan. Ivan has called the
Minister of Advanced Education for a reason. Ukrainians have already suffered
so much as a result of Russia’s illegal invasion of their country. These
students are just asking to be treated the same as refugees who pay domestic
tuition.
Why won’t that minister do the right
thing and reverse the cuts today?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Advanced Education.
Hon. Ken
Cheveldayoff: —
Well again, Mr. Speaker, his questions aren’t based in fact, and there is no
cuts that are taking place. The Canada-Ukraine authorization for emergency
travel program, the CUAET program, came to place in 2023. It’s a three-year
program currently . . . federal program. And the Minister of Career
Training and myself are in touch with the federal administrators of that
program.
But beyond that, I’ve instructed my
ministry officials and we’ll be looking at possible continuations of the
program. And certainly again there is no need for any of the three dozen or so
students in Saskatchewan to fear anything other than the theatrics of the NDP
opposite.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Riversdale.
Kim Breckner: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. We’ve seen the first signs of winter and with that, thousands of
people are purchasing winter tires in an affordability crisis. To make matters
worse, Tire Stewardship of Saskatchewan is hiking the fee charged on every tire
because of this decision — on every tire by 30 per cent — which this government
signed off on. All of this was brought on by stripping Shercom of the tire
recycling contract and handing it to an out-of-province company charging much
more.
Can
the minister tell this House how much in total this change will cost
Saskatchewan drivers?
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Environment.
Hon. Travis
Keisig: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Tire Stewardship of Saskatchewan is an industry-led
board. They are tasked with keeping tires out of landfill at the request of
many municipalities across Saskatchewan. They are tasked with the
responsibility to see tires recycled in the province of Saskatchewan, Mr.
Speaker. They are also tasked with the handling of all of the fees and
jurisdiction with that.
All of these questions should be handled
by the Tire Stewardship of Saskatchewan. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Jeremy
Cockrill: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I stand today to move the second reading
of Bill 36, The Change of Name Amendment Act, 2025. Saskatchewan is
introducing this legislation to remove common barriers that citizens face when
applying for a legal name change, while also better aligning Saskatchewan’s
legislation with other jurisdictions.
Saskatchewan’s population is growing and
becoming more diverse. These amendments reflect changes in naming conventions
and traditions. The legislation will remove the limit on the number of surnames
allowed, which is currently set at two. Mr. Speaker, in order to better protect
privacy and in some cases personal safety, this amendment will also remove the
requirement to provide proof that the spouse of a person requesting a change of
name has been notified. Finally the amendment will enhance information sharing
with law enforcement agencies to streamline administrative processes once a
change of name has been registered.
Changes to the Act also lay a foundation
for upcoming changes to related regulations, including a recent Throne Speech
commitment to prevent those convicted of serious crimes from legally changing
their name.
I’d like to note, Mr. Speaker, that
these amendments support proposed changes coming in The Vital Statistics
Amendment Act, which has also been introduced in this House. Consultations
have taken place with other vital statistics officers across Canada, as well as
law enforcement and other agencies that rely on the provision of proper
identification while working with the public.
We are confident that these changes not
only better align Saskatchewan legislation with other jurisdictions, but will
result in improvements for citizens and the public agencies that serve the
people of Saskatchewan.
Mr. Speaker, I am now pleased to move
the second reading of Bill 36, The Change of Name Amendment Act, 2025.
Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — It’s been moved that Bill
No. 36, The Change of Name Amendment Act, 2025 be now read a second
time. Is the Assembly ready for the question? I recognize the member from
Regina South Albert.
Aleana Young: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. My thanks
to the minister for his introductory remarks on Bill No. 36, The Change
of Name Amendment Act.
Having heard a
number of these changes are being made in the spirit of aligning Saskatchewan
with other jurisdictions as well as working closely with different agencies,
whether that be law enforcement or other, the House can be assured that our
critic will undertake the work of consulting with stakeholders to make sure
some of these notifications, especially those involving police, are done safely
and responsibly for all parties involved.
[14:30]
The change, I
believe, in this bill, particularly pertaining to being unable to change a
spouse’s name without their written consent or the lack of notification for
your spouse if you’re changing your name, is also something that of course
we’ll be looking at to ensure the safety of all people in Saskatchewan, Mr.
Speaker.
In addition to
that, of course we’ll be looking at some of the motivations behind the changes
the minister referenced. I’m curious of course about how many temporary
residents were attempting to change their names and why. But of course as our
province continues to become a more diverse place, Mr. Speaker, welcoming
greater diversity and the freedom to respect people’s cultural and religious
naming practices is, I think, a welcome change to modernize this legislation.
As I said, Mr.
Speaker, I know the critic will undertake the consultations necessary for this
bill. And with that I’m happy to leave the work to them and will move to
adjourn debate on Bill No. 36.
Speaker Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is
it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — Carried.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the Minister of Health.
Hon. Jeremy
Cockrill: — Thank you,
Mr. Speaker. I stand today to move the second reading of Bill 37, The Vital
Statistics Amendment Act, 2025. Saskatchewan is introducing this
legislation to remove common barriers for citizens and create efficiencies for
the administration of vital statistics in the province.
I’d like to
note, Mr. Speaker, that this amendment is being moved in conjunction with
changes to The Change of Name Act, 1995, which supports the amendments
made in The Vital Statistics Act, 2009.
As I
previously mentioned, Saskatchewan’s population is growing and becoming more
diverse. These amendments reflect changes in naming conventions and traditions.
They will allow, for example, the option to register a single name, or mononym,
provided the name holds cultural or religious significance.
Amendments to The
Vital Statistics Act, 2009 give the registrar additional discretion to
issue certificates and make necessary
amendments without requiring a court order, a tedious requirement that creates
unnecessary hardship for residents.
Mr. Speaker, this amendment is supported
by the Government of Saskatchewan, police, and other public agencies as well as
vital statistics agencies across Canada. The amended Act also better aligns
Saskatchewan vital statistics legislation with other jurisdictions.
Mr. Speaker, I am now pleased to move
the second reading of Bill 37, The Vital Statistics Amendment Act, 2025.
Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — It has been moved that Bill
No. 37, The Vital Statistics Amendment Act, 2025 be now read a
second time. Is the Assembly ready for the question? I recognize the member
from Regina South Albert.
Aleana Young: — Thank you very
much, Mr. Speaker. My thanks again to the minister for his comments on Bill
No. 37, The Vital Statistics Amendment Act.
Having just heard the comments and taken
a brief look at the legislation, one of the points of interest in this is
obviously that the minister can appoint a registrar of vital statistics — in
keeping with other health registrars, of course. One of the parts that jumped
out to me in looking at this was the ability of the registrar to make minor
amendments to names, including spelling, if satisfied that the individual does
go by that name and there’s no bad intentions.
An interesting piece of casework through
my office, Mr. Speaker, in which a constituent of mine, a great woman and well
into her 70s, had her name incorrectly listed on her health card through no
fault of her own. And boy, was that a three-and-a-half-month process for this
wonderful constituent of mine, Mr. Speaker, to work through the government
agencies to try and prove to them that it was in fact her health card that had
been issued that was incorrect, not the name that she’d gone by for well over
70 years of life, Mr. Speaker.
I recognize it’s a slightly different
situation, but ensuring that government agencies can work quickly and nimbly
with members of the public to make necessary changes, including minor
amendments to names, I think, is a good thing, Mr. Speaker. People want clear
and responsive public services from their government.
Another couple of things I know the
critic will be looking into in terms of this piece of legislation is what, I
think, are some of the changes that allow for the disclosure of information to
public agencies in regards to records covered by this piece of legislation,
unless there’s a belief that it’s for profit or gain. Of course looking into
how exactly that’s defined and clarified in the legislation, I think, will be
important, as well as the ability to amend marriage records to protect the
privacy of vulnerable persons at the registrar’s discretion. All important, Mr.
Speaker, especially given this province’s egregious rates of IPV [intimate
partner violence].
Some other small changes that we saw
made through this legislation — around requesting records of uninsured health
services in regards to, say, live births and stillbirths, and allowing
parentage to be updated on birth certificates for up to a year — are all
changes that I think this legislation is seeking to undertake, as well as some
ability for other individuals such as funeral directors to issue statements of
death, or the children or siblings of the deceased to request even minor
documentation, Mr. Speaker.
It’s good to modernize naming
regulations, again in keeping with our increasingly diverse province, Mr.
Speaker. And the critic will certainly be looking at some of the changes made
in regards to the abilities of law enforcement both to keep people safe and
also to search records in non-criminal investigations.
With that, Mr. Speaker, I’m quite
confident the critic will do a much deeper dive into this legislation in her
consultation with stakeholders, and I’m happy to move to adjourn debate on Bill
No. 37.
Speaker
Goudy: —
The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to
adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members:
— Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: —
Carried.
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the Minister of Education.
Hon. Everett
Hindley: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am pleased to rise and give second reading to Bill
38, The Building Schools Faster Act, 2025. The new Act will define the
requirements for municipalities to acquire and to service land for new schools
throughout the province. Purchasing additional land is often necessary as we’re
often building larger schools, requiring more land than what is often available
through a municipal reserve under The Planning and Development Act, 2007.
The new Act will establish municipal
responsibility to acquire sufficient serviced land for the purpose of
constructing new schools in new development areas. A cost contribution formula
will be defined in regulations, allowing the Government of Saskatchewan and
municipalities to share the costs of land in a predictable and consistent
manner. The new Act also establishes the authority to set land acquisition time
frames and enforcement mechanisms for municipalities.
In conjunction with the new Act,
amendments to The Planning and Development Act, 2007 are being
introduced to provide municipalities the tools to fund and acquire school
sites. Providing mechanisms for municipalities to fund the purchase of land
through levies or a municipal reserve, for example, is necessary as this new
Act requires municipalities to pay for a portion of the land.
A consequential amendment to The
Education Act, 1995 will also be required in conjunction with the new Act
and regulations which will be brought forward after Royal Assent.
A defined-cost contribution from the
province will be developed in the regulations. Defined-cost contribution allows
the ministries of Education and SaskBuilds and Procurement to advance projects
consistently and also more effectively. This will reduce lengthy negotiations
and allow parties to plan and budget for education infrastructure.
Mr. Speaker, I now move second reading
of Bill No. 38, the building schools faster amendment Act.
Speaker
Goudy: — It’s been moved that Bill
No. 38, The Building Schools Faster Act
be now read a second time. Is the Assembly ready for the question? I recognize
the member from Regina South Albert.
Aleana Young: — Thank you. Thank
you very much, Mr. Speaker. Very interested in this piece of legislation and
was interested to see it when it was introduced in the Assembly, The
Building Schools Faster Act.
You know, Mr. Speaker, I don’t want to
be too cynical, but I saw the title of this bill and I thought, oh gosh, good,
Government of Saskatchewan legislating themselves into building some schools
faster. Because I remember, I think about École Harbour Landing in the great
state of Regina Pasqua, Mr. Speaker, which I believe has been . . .
or Harbour Landing West. Forgive me. The new school has been announced, I
think, four or five times over the past eight years, Mr. Speaker.
I was, I believe, still a young and
impressionable, much gentler, kinder school board trustee at that point when
the school was first announced. And here we are, eight short years later, and I
believe we’re just breaking ground now on the Harbour Landing West school here
in Regina, a school that is of course deeply needed by the community. Because
of course members ought to remember that École Harbour Landing was over
capacity the day that it opened the doors. This was something that had been
identified of course by all school board proponents at that point.
But I recognize this legislation does
only apply to new schools, Mr. Speaker, but it does give me the opportunity to
recognize that we do need to pay attention to all the schools here in
Saskatchewan. I think about McVeety in my own constituency, Mr. Speaker. This
is a school that has never quite made it onto the major capital list, and I had
a plucky constituent of mine who actually took it all the way. She FOI’d
[freedom of information] the government. I think she ended up taking them to
court because she was so frustrated. She couldn’t figure out why McVeety was
never making it to a rebuild list.
You bet we need to be building new
schools. We need to be building them faster, Mr. Speaker. And we need a better
plan when it comes to preventative maintenance and a better plan when it comes
to major capital here in Saskatchewan.
I paid close attention to the minister’s
comments. I’m quite interested in what some of the mechanisms in this will look
like around the obligations on municipalities to pay for some of these land
acquisitions, what that looks like. Of course always nervous when the
Government of Saskatchewan says, well we’re going to introduce the legislation,
but the details will be in the regulations after the fact, especially when it
comes to things around how those dollars are going to move around, the fee
structure, who’s going to have to pay for what. To me, Mr. Speaker, it strikes
me that those are important conversations to have beforehand, to have as part
of the discussion of this legislation, not just in the regulations after this
bill has received Royal Assent.
I think we’ll have a lot of
opportunities to scrutinize this bill, Mr. Speaker. I know the SSBAs
[Saskatchewan School Boards Association] are in town this week, and I’m sure
we’ll all have great conversations with the leaders in education present in
Regina from across the province today. I know the critic will be having great
conversations — the critics — with municipalities and with school divisions as
well.
And look forward to hearing more
hopefully from the government on some of these more specific mechanisms and
changes that they’re going to be making, and hopefully be able to hear some of
those proposed changes before the bill receives Royal Assent. With that, Mr. Speaker, I will
move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 38.
Speaker Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is
it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — Carried.
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the Minister of Education.
Hon. Everett
Hindley: — Thank you,
Mr. Speaker. I am pleased once again to rise to give second reading to Bill 39,
The Building Schools Faster Consequential Amendment Act, 2025. This
new Act will make a consequential amendment to The Education Act, 1995,
resulting from the enactment of The Building Schools Faster Act — The
Building Schools Faster Act which will establish municipal responsibility
to acquire sufficient serviced land for the purposes of constructing new
schools in new development areas. The amendments to The
Education Act, 1995 clarifies
land acquisition provisions for schools
in new development areas will fall under The
Building Schools Faster Act.
Mr. Speaker, with that I now move second
reading of Bill 39, The Building Schools Faster Consequential Amendment Act,
2025 bilingual.
Speaker
Goudy: — The minister has moved that Bill
No. 39, The Building Schools Faster Consequential Amendment Act, 2025 be
now read a second time. Is the Assembly ready for the question? I recognize the member from Regina
South Albert.
Aleana Young: — Thank you very
much, Mr. Speaker. A couple comments I’d like to put on the record in regards
to Bill 39, The Building Schools Faster Consequential Amendment Act. I
think I heard the minister say that the only changes that are going to be made
are going to be moving some things out of The Education Act and into The
Building Schools Faster Act, Mr. Speaker.
[14:45]
And I think I heard that. I was glad to
hear that, Mr. Speaker. I again get nervous any time the government talks about
opening up The Education Act. Of course there’s some changes that need
to be made in that piece of legislation, all pieces of legislation. But
certainly optimistic that the only changes that will be made pertain to
building schools faster and the tools necessary to the government to do it.
I believe in the main bill, Bill 38,
there’s some changes to allow the minister to order municipalities to acquire
land, with the consequence if they don’t, that the government can withhold
revenues equal to the value of market land for up to 60 days’ notice. Of course
these are going to be some significant changes, and I recognize there’s going
to be collaboration needed between municipalities and school divisions to
present the minister with contribution agreements for those costs, timelines,
land needs.
But again, this is going to be tricky
work, balancing all those relationships between key partners with the important
goal of getting more schools built in the communities where we desperately need
them here in Saskatchewan.
So with that, I know as I’ve said with
all bills today, Mr. Speaker, the critic will be doing the great work of
consulting with stakeholders, and we look forward to additional debate on this
piece of legislation as it comes before the House for scrutiny. With that I’m
happy to move to adjourn debate on Bill No. 39, The Building Schools
Faster Consequential Amendment Act.
Speaker
Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Warren
Kaeding that Bill No. 24 — The
Saskatchewan Internal Trade Promotion Act be now read a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Southeast.
Brittney
Senger: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to go on the record with some
remarks about Bill No. 24, The Saskatchewan Internal Trade Promotion
Act. I was happy to see this government come forward with something that
is, frankly, long overdue.
This is an important time where we are
in a trade war and, you know, consulting or, you know, going up against a
number of other countries when it comes to tariffs and trade-related disputes,
and really working to get Saskatchewan goods to market as soon as possible. So
frankly, I think that this is well overdue. You know, we want to remove
barriers and we want to make sure that we’re doing everything that we can to
improve the economy here in Saskatchewan.
As I said, I’m happy to see that the
minister is taking tariffs seriously and that this is something that is being
moved along, but how come the Premier and the Minister of Finance haven’t
seemed to take this as seriously?
We’re glad that Canadian interprovincial
trade is being prioritized. But I want us to also take a moment to talk about
the bill that my colleagues on this side have put forward, Bill No. 605. One thing that makes this very
different than Bill No. 24 is the consultation and work that was done
around labour standards. This is extremely important. We need to make sure that
we’re not just looking out for the economy, but that we’re looking out for
everybody in Saskatchewan — every employee — by ensuring that we are meeting
labour standards, we’re meeting employment standards, we’re meeting
occupational health and safety standards.
And that really begins in consultation
with everybody in Saskatchewan, including labour unions, including the average
worker to make sure that we’re not sacrificing their working standards just to
push a bill through. And we trust that these labour standards will not be
sacrificed and that the well-being of Saskatchewan workers will be protected.
I’m, like I said, very glad that this is
finally a priority, and I’m optimistic that the government will continue to
consult with appropriate stakeholders. I know on our side we most definitely
will. We will certainly have conversations about protecting workers, advancing
labour rights, protecting labour rights, and protecting workers across the
province.
And with that I move to adjourn debate
on Bill No. 24.
Speaker
Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Jim Reiter that Bill No. 25 — The Income Tax (Miscellaneous) Amendment Act,
2025 be now read a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Mount Royal.
Trent
Wotherspoon: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s a pleasure. I’ll be fairly brief here today
entering in to debate with respect to Bill No. 25, The Income Tax
(Miscellaneous) Amendment Act, 2025. Mr. Speaker, what’s being brought
forward here is real straightforward. Mr. Speaker, I’ve had a briefing by
officials on this matter. It pertains to the fertility treatment tax credit,
the FTTC. That legislation was already brought forward and passed in this
Assembly.
The change that’s being brought forward
here is technical in nature to make sure that it’s clear in legislation and
cited in legislation that Revenue Canada is authorized to make payment for the
refundable tax credit. And so this is making clear that this is something that
Saskatchewan families can pursue here this year — they’ll be able to file on
their taxes this year, Mr. Speaker.
So there was a bit of an oversight or
miscommunication, I understand, on this front as the legislation was put
together in the first place, and this legislation is now needed to be very
clear that that refundable tax credit is able to be payable by the federal
government. And of course this is something important to the people of the
province, something that we’re supportive of, making sure that families are
supported where they have challenges with fertility and they’re supported in
that treatment. By passing this legislation this will ensure that families are
able to mark that on when they file their taxes and that that’ll be payable in
this upcoming tax year.
So certainly we will, you know, work
with the government in an efficient way to move this legislation forward, to
make sure that families are able to receive the tax credit that they deserve.
That’s all I have to say on this point,
Mr. Speaker. We’ll look forward to committee and making sure that we ensure
that families that have gone through fertility treatments are able to utilize
that tax credit in the upcoming tax year.
Speaker
Goudy: — The question before the Assembly is
a motion by the member that Bill No. 25, The Income Tax (Miscellaneous)
Amendment Act, 2025 be now read a second time. Is it the pleasure of the
Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried.
Deputy
Clerk: — Second reading of this bill.
Speaker
Goudy: — To which committee shall this bill
be committed? I recognize the Minister of Remote and Rural
Health.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Mr. Speaker, to the Standing Committee on Crown and Central Agencies.
Speaker
Goudy: — This bill stands committed to the
Standing Committee on Central Agencies.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill No. 26 — The Miscellaneous Statutes Repeal Act, 2025 be
now read a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Douglas Park.
Nicole Sarauer: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. It’s my honour to rise today and enter into the debate on Bill
No. 26, The Miscellaneous Statutes
Repeal Act, 2025. Now this piece of legislation removes from the books
several — almost I think over a few hundred actually — pieces of legislation
that are outdated, Mr. Speaker.
I’m looking forward to having the
opportunity to ask questions of the minister and his officials at committee.
And in order to facilitate that work, I am prepared to allow this bill to move
on to its next stage.
Speaker Goudy:
— The question before the Assembly is the motion by the minister that Bill
No. 26, The Miscellaneous Statutes Repeal Act, 2025 be now read a
second time. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members:
— Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: —
Carried.
Deputy
Clerk: — Second
reading of this bill.
Speaker
Goudy: —
To which committee shall this bill be
committed? I recognize
the Minister of Remote and Rural Health.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, to the
Standing Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs and Justice.
Speaker Goudy: — This
bill stands committed to the Standing Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
and Justice.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill No. 27 — The Statute Law Amendment Act, 2025/Loi de 2025
modifiant le droit législatif be
now read a second time.]
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the member from Regina Douglas Park.
Nicole Sarauer: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s my honour to rise
today and enter into the debate on Bill No. 27, The Statute Law
Amendment Act, 2025. Mr. Speaker, I understand that this bill makes many
housekeeping amendments to pieces of legislation.
Looking
forward to having the opportunity to ask questions of the minister and his
officials at committee. In order to facilitate that work, I’m now prepared to
allow this bill to move on to its next stage.
Speaker Goudy:
— The question before the Assembly is the motion by the minister that Bill
No. 27, The Statute Law Amendment Act, 2025 be now read a second
time. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members:
— Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: —
Carried.
Deputy
Clerk: — Second
reading of this bill.
Speaker
Goudy: —
To which committee shall this bill be committed? I recognize
the Minister of Remote and Rural Health.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, to the
Standing Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs and Justice.
Speaker Goudy: — This
bill stands committed to the Standing Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
and Justice.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Everett Hindley that Bill
No. 28 — The Public Libraries Amendment Act, 2025 be now read a second time.]
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the member from Regina Rochdale.
Joan Pratchler: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’m pleased to rise today
to enter into debate regarding The Public
Libraries Amendment Act, 2025. This Act establishes that
Lloydminster is one city in the library system and not half a city. They are
leaving the Lakeland’s regional library system and moving to a municipal one in
co-operation with Alberta. The other key point in this amendment Act
is to replace the words “Aboriginal” with “Indigenous” as we move forward.
We support libraries of course. We know
what happened in 2017 when the government tried to defund libraries. The
backlash was not very good. Saskatchewan libraries had to close temporarily
last spring because of a mental health crisis in Saskatoon with some of the
issues at their main library branch, and we want to have more respect for our
librarians and the positions that they’re in.
I also note that in consulting with many
librarians across the province this past summer, we found that all the
representatives regarded this change of bringing Lloydminster under one
umbrella was very well received and they supported that as well.
[15:00]
We have some concerns about the support
and the trust between the sector and the ministry, and we hope that that moves
forward in a more positive way in the future. We have some concerns about the
consultation process, some of the timelines, some of the weighting of the input
in some of those decisions.
And with that, Mr. Speaker, I recommend
that this bill can move to its next stage to committee, and I conclude my
remarks.
Speaker
Goudy: — The question before the Assembly is
the motion by the minister that Bill
No. 28, The Public Libraries Amendment Act, 2025, be now
read a second time. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried.
Deputy
Clerk: — Second reading of this bill.
Speaker
Goudy: — To which committee shall this bill
be committed? I recognize the Deputy Government House
Leader.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Mr. Speaker, to the Standing Committee on Human Services.
Speaker
Goudy: — This bill stands committed to the
Standing Committee on Human Services.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Alana Ross that Bill No. 29 — The Tailgating
Act/Loi sur les rassemblements d’avant-match be now read
a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Southeast.
Brittney
Senger: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I have to say, what a privilege to have
remarks on the record today about Bill
No. 29, The Tailgating Act, the day after the 112th Grey Cup
when the Saskatchewan Roughriders took home the cup. What an honour it is to
talk about this bill honestly.
And so really, what an important day it
is to be talking about Bill No. 29. I’ll be honest — it’s hard to be
critical of this bill today as we’re still coming off of this historic high and
celebration.
The only concern really that comes to
mind for me is that we need to make sure that this isn’t our only priority. We
need to make sure that while we continue to celebrate, while we continue to
stand united behind our football team, behind the Roughriders, that we also
remember where our priorities are and we remember all of the very important other
things that we need to be working on to unite the province.
There’s things like cost of living,
financial anxiety, health care, education — these are things that we hear
across the board. And although I will admit I have never been tailgating, it
sounds like an awful lot of fun. And I’m looking forward to joining my
colleagues in tailgating at some point down the road, while also ensuring, as I
said, that we continue to prioritize some of those very valuable things that
are important to everybody across Saskatchewan.
And with that, I will move to adjourn
debate on Bill No. 29, The
Tailgating Act.
Speaker Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn debate. Is it
the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy: — Carried.
[The
Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Alana
Ross that Bill No. 30 — The
Inter-jurisdictional Support Orders Amendment Act, 2025/Loi modificative de
2025 sur les ordonnances alimentaires interterritoriales be now read a second time.]
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the member from
Saskatoon University-Sutherland.
Tajinder Grewal: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’m pleased to enter the
debate on Bill No. 30, The Inter-jurisdictional Support Orders
Amendment Act, 2025. As a party, we support international co-operation on
this important topic.
Kids are our future. We need to support kids in this province, in this
country, and internationally. It’s really tough for families to look after
their kids in this economy, even before you factor in the difficulties of
international barriers. There are so many people in this province going to the
food banks, and more than 40 per cent among them are the
kids. Saskatchewan has the highest proportion of child food bank users in the
country.
I’m an agriculture scientist, Mr.
Speaker. We have so much to offer. And we always say that we are here to feed
the world and we export our products and food to so many countries, but somehow
the kids in this province go hungry to bed. They go hungry to the schools. We
can do better. We can do much, much better.
With that, Mr. Speaker, I move to
adjourn the debate on Bill No. 30. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill No. 31 — The
Defamation Act be now
read a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon
University-Sutherland.
Tajinder
Grewal: —
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’m now pleased to enter the debate on Bill No. 31, The Defamation Act.
And this Act is extremely important because defamation is happening on the
internet. There is so much misinformation and disinformation on the internet
and some people using it wrongly.
But many terminology in this Act is
vague and needs to be cleared up. Because I’m coming from a country where
sometimes the bills are passed with good intentions, then the ruling party
using those bills against the political opponents, to silence the dissent,
against the people who are . . . like journalists who are reporting
power abuse or who are exposing the corruption. So we want to make sure that
all the terminology in this bill is pretty clear.
And with that, Mr. Speaker, I will move
to adjourn the debate on Bill No. 31.
Speaker
Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill No. 32 — The Defamation
Consequential Amendments Act, 2025/Loi de 2025 corrélative de la loi intitulée
The Defamation Act be
now read a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon
University-Sutherland.
Tajinder Grewal: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. And now I enter the debate on Bill
No. 32, The Defamation Consequential Amendments Act, 2025.
This is a similar bill I talked to before. This Act is
required and we need it. But again some terminology in that Act is very vague.
It’s not clear. And our shadow minister is talking to the stakeholders to make
sure that the wordings are clear.
And with that, Mr. Speaker, I move to
adjourn the debate on Bill No. 32. Thank you.
Speaker
Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill No. 33 — The Credit Union Amendment Act, 2025 be now read a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Saskatoon Southeast.
Kim Breckner: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to go on the record with some comments about
Bill No. 33, The Credit Union Amendment Act.
I love credit unions. And I have
certainly, you know, been involved with credit unions, and frankly also seen
family members use credit unions, my grandparents included for their entire
life. I really admire that. And I think that speaks to the incredible way that
credit unions are connected to their community. I think it’s very valuable and
I think that there is a lot of value.
And I also see the way that credit
unions contribute to their local communities, to community-based organizations.
And I think that that really says a tremendous amount about the way that credit
unions can unite communities and can bring people together.
So you know, as we continue to consult
with stakeholders and continue to look into the details of these amendments,
you know, we’ll be having conversations with credit unions, with credit union
members, and with anyone really affected by these amendments. It’s really
important that we protect credit unions, that we protect credit union members,
and that we make sure anyone can withdraw from their membership, but also that
the credit union remains to have a say as well.
And with that I will move to adjourn
debate on Bill No. 33, The Credit Union Amendment Act.
Speaker
Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Tim McLeod that Bill No. 34 — The Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act be now read a second time.]
Speaker Goudy: — I recognize the
member from Saskatoon Chief Mistawasis.
Don McBean: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. It’s my privilege to rise today to make some comments regarding Bill
No. 34, The Cyberstalking and Coercive Control Act, which of course
is An Act to amend The Victims of Interpersonal Violence Act.
It’s a pretty straightforward legal
change that we are removing a word and acting two subclauses to the definition
of “interpersonal violence,” which are keeping up with the time, that not only
that there has to be a factual, coercive use . . . or a use of
coercion, controlling behaviour, but that it constitutes or resembles that, and
then adding in cyberstalking and online harassment.
These are important things. I’m sure
that the people involved have bumped their heads against the fact that without
those, they weren’t able to progress in certain regards. But what’s important
to me and to us on this side is to have a chance to talk about IPV and the fact
that the government across for 18 years have allowed the situation where we are
in a place of the highest level of IPV.
The province’s 2025 Domestic Violence
Death Review Report found we were among the highest rates of domestic
violence, domestic homicide in Canada. These amendments in Bill 34 aren’t going
to address that, but it is important that we put that in our focus.
It’s technical language. We all know
about IPV. We all knew about it way back before it even had a name such as
that. There was a point decades ago — I permit myself — where we knew it
happened. It didn’t have a name and we didn’t talk about it. It was just
something we looked the other way. As we’ve advanced through the decades it
does have a name. We do have a place for it. We need to give it every possible
support for the understanding and the education around what it is and what it
is we can do about it.
I know working in various schools in
Saskatoon where there were women’s shelters in the areas, we would see the
incredible disruption to children’s lives. They would come into the shelter.
They would be there for three weeks or maybe three months, and then off they
went again as they were fleeing their partner’s violence.
I think I’ve had two occasions to speak
about the first phone call that I received after being elected. She
respectfully waited two days to phone me, a constituent named Joan McDonald, to
tell me about her daughter who was killed in southeast Saskatchewan by her
partner, and the work, the advocacy that Joan was doing. Joan was instrumental.
She met with us and the member from Southeast. There’s been a petition that’s
been repeatedly brought forth in the Chamber.
[15:15]
And what is so amazing about this story
in particular is Joan wants us to be educated. And her focus is to promote a
bill — forthcoming, we hope — that would have education about interpersonal
violence, domestic violence be a condition of employment at all levels of
employment, from working on the fryer at McDonald’s to being the CEO of a
company. There would be a mandatory education regarding interpersonal violence,
domestic violence.
Education — surprise, surprise; I always
circle back to that — is primordial to everything that we’re trying to solve.
It always seems to go back to education, which again is why the collateral
damage of Bill 137 and not allowing third parties into the classrooms
. . . I was a classroom teacher. I taught this stuff and I loved it
when I had someone with more knowledge than me coming in and being able to do
that. So the detrimental effect of 137 in this regard is worthy of note again.
Joan’s petition, we hope, will, as I say
. . . And so doing a little fixing and legalese to it is a great
idea. Addressing cyberstalking, yes. We live in 2025. Everything happens on our
phones, including the nefarious things.
And with that, I move to adjourn the
debate on Bill 134.
Speaker
Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker Goudy:
— Carried.
[The Assembly resumed the adjourned
debate on the proposed motion by the Hon. Colleen Young that Bill No. 35 — The Mineral Resources
Amendment Act, 2025 be now read a second time.]
Speaker
Goudy: — I
recognize the member from Regina Rochdale.
Joan Pratchler: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. I rise today to make a few comments regarding The Mineral Resources
Amendment Act, Bill No. 35. This bill establishes rules for designated
subsurface development areas to maximize mineral exploration and extraction in
our province. And we know that our mining sector is very important to our
province, and if this is going to help make that even better, what a good idea.
We are supportive of this bill in
theory. We want mining to happen efficiently and responsibly. We’ll be talking
to our stakeholders and we expect to see good consultation from the government
with all stakeholders, but especially including those from our First Nations.
The minister has identified that this is
intended to be a tool to remove barriers and provide stability and certainty to
our mineral resource sector. And in those cases where mineral rights holders at
the subsurface are unable to be located and that impedes resource development
in our province, with this bill, that might enhance the efficiency of that.
It’s also important that we learn a
little bit more about the details and ensure that the protection of rights
holders is recognized. We want to ensure that our stakeholders are adequately
consulted for the best possible outcomes. And with that, I move to adjourn
debate.
Speaker
Goudy: — The member has moved to adjourn
debate. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried. I recognize the Deputy
Government House Leader.
Hon. Lori Carr: — Thank you, Mr.
Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I move that this House do now adjourn.
Speaker
Goudy: — It has been moved that this House do
now adjourn. Is it the pleasure of the Assembly to adopt the motion?
Some
Hon. Members: — Agreed.
Speaker
Goudy: — Carried. This Assembly now stands
adjourned until tomorrow at 1:30 p.m.
[The Assembly adjourned at 15:19.]
Published
under the authority of the Hon. Todd Goudy, Speaker
Disclaimer:
The electronic versions of the Legislative Assembly’s documents are provided on
this site for informational purposes only. The Clerk is responsible for the
records of each legislature.